From: whisky-dave on 25 Jun 2010 08:54 "Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message news:2010062407310735001-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom... > On 2010-06-24 05:37:09 -0700, "whisky-dave" <whisky-dave(a)final.front.ear> > said: > >> So it's not an old print doesn't it have to be 50+ tears old >> before it's worth anything. ;-) > > Darn! > I thought it was the photographer who was supposed to be 50+ years (that > could be "50+ tears") old. > ...and all I am worth is my pension! ;-( Actually that could be the next shoot-in. Either post your oldest photo or first photo you took (that's still availible) either with a film or digital camera.
From: David Ruether on 25 Jun 2010 12:09 "John McWilliams" <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:i010hg$emv$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > Savageduck wrote: >> On 2010-06-24 16:43:04 -0700, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> said: >>> David Ruether wrote: >>>> "Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message >>>> news:2010062409300315668-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom... >>>>> On 2010-06-24 08:52:02 -0700, John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> said: >>>>>> To ensure the maximum "readability" of links, put each on a separate line, enclosed in angled brackets < >, with a space and >>>>>> a c/r at the end; nothing else. >>>>> Exactly. I shall try to remember to keep a space "fore-'n'-aft" of a URL in the future...;-) >>> Speaking of formatting, though, David: Your line wrap is awfully short- ca. 80 characters is a good choice. I use short lines with hard returns for a reason. I like my reader since its text size is reasonable for easy reading (the samples supplied of other reader[s] have text that is too small [and I prefer B&W to color and ">>"s to vertical lines for showing "age"...;-]), and I dislike having my text lines broken at odd locations (making for odd-length bits) or not at all... So, there! 8^) I also retain copies of what I write for archiving on my web site, and my method provides "clean", consistent copies. >>> And the sig. delimiter- two dashes, a space and a c/r- what Unison does to those is not cricket.... >>> >>> Cheers. >> >> David is using Outlook Express. >> I am the one using Unison, and I fully agree with you regarding how URL's should be entered. However I am not sure what you are >> getting at with regard to sig delimiters. From what I see Unison keeps to the convention as you stated when I compose a post, and >> I see yours as I am sure you intended. >> < http://homepage.mac.com/lco/filechute/JW-01.jpg > > > Ah, I see: OE is mangling your perfectly well formed sig delimiter, (as seen in DR's replies to you) but that's OE. David is, > perhaps, missing a carriage return on his, or OE butchers it on the outgoing. > > All's well and nothing's changed: Google groups and OE are tied for the worst news handlers. -- > John McWilliams 'Pends on preferences.....;-) --DR (with lack of return intended, but, "whatever"...... 8^)
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Prev: [SI] New Mandates! Get 'em while they're hot! Next: The Nikon EM was FF |