Aether Displacement
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Greatest Website EVER!
Next: Anyone knowledgeable about lowest viscosity fluid at roomtemperature and atmospheric pressure?
From: BURT on 16 Apr 2010 23:01 On Apr 16, 7:35 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 16, 6:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 16, 4:33 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 15, 11:15 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > If universal aether is expanding it is enlarging orbits into lesser > > > > gravity. Aether is also expanding light. This is the cosmological > > > > redshift. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > The universe is not expanding. > > > > The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream. > > > > Turn the following image 90 degrees, where Quantum Fluctuations is at > > > the bottom of the image, and the image is of a pressure cooker: > > > >http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html > > > > Here are a couple of images which are more correct in representing > > > what the universe is then the absurd nonsense of a Big Bang. The > > > universe is more like a Big Ongoing. > > > >http://www.feandft.com/BlackHole.jpg > > > > In the following image, the gray area is the Rindler Horizon: > > > >http://huntersofthecloud.com/images/HuntersofTheCloudmagfield.gif > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rindler_coordinates#The_Rindler_horizon > > > Where is the jet stream orginating and flowing to if the universe is > > not expanding? > > > Mitch Raemsch > > In the following image the jet stream originates at the Quantum > Fluctuations: > > http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html > > After the Dark Energy Accelerated Expansion the matter goes over the > 'water fall' and winds up back at the Rindler Horizon, which is the > midpoint between the two jet streams as represented here: > > http://www.feandft.com/BlackHole.jpg > > That's not to say there is, or isn't, another jet stream. There may be > another one, there could be an infinite number of them. It could also > be that what we see is all there is. > > The point being the notion of a 'Big Bang' where all that we see > originated at a single instance is absurd nonsense. What we see is an > ongoing process.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - You have two jet streams now? Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 16 Apr 2010 23:24 On Apr 16, 11:01 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 16, 7:35 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 16, 6:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 16, 4:33 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 15, 11:15 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > If universal aether is expanding it is enlarging orbits into lesser > > > > > gravity. Aether is also expanding light. This is the cosmological > > > > > redshift. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > The universe is not expanding. > > > > > The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream. > > > > > Turn the following image 90 degrees, where Quantum Fluctuations is at > > > > the bottom of the image, and the image is of a pressure cooker: > > > > >http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html > > > > > Here are a couple of images which are more correct in representing > > > > what the universe is then the absurd nonsense of a Big Bang. The > > > > universe is more like a Big Ongoing. > > > > >http://www.feandft.com/BlackHole.jpg > > > > > In the following image, the gray area is the Rindler Horizon: > > > > >http://huntersofthecloud.com/images/HuntersofTheCloudmagfield.gif > > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rindler_coordinates#The_Rindler_horizon > > > > Where is the jet stream orginating and flowing to if the universe is > > > not expanding? > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > In the following image the jet stream originates at the Quantum > > Fluctuations: > > >http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html > > > After the Dark Energy Accelerated Expansion the matter goes over the > > 'water fall' and winds up back at the Rindler Horizon, which is the > > midpoint between the two jet streams as represented here: > > >http://www.feandft.com/BlackHole.jpg > > > That's not to say there is, or isn't, another jet stream. There may be > > another one, there could be an infinite number of them. It could also > > be that what we see is all there is. > > > The point being the notion of a 'Big Bang' where all that we see > > originated at a single instance is absurd nonsense. What we see is an > > ongoing process.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > You have two jet streams now? > > Mitch Raemsch What were you misinterpreting in "The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream"? If the local universe is in a jet stream then there may be other jet streams. The point being, everything we see may not be the complete universe. If you superimpose this image: http://aether.lbl.gov/image_all.html on this image: http://www.feandft.com/BlackHole.jpg At this stage in our limited knowledge, how would we know if there wasn't more of the same?
From: mpc755 on 22 Apr 2010 10:18 On Apr 11, 9:45 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 10, 9:51 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 7, 9:57 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 5, 3:15 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity > > > > by > > > > Albert Einstein' > > > > > "What is fundamentally new in the ether of the general theory of > > > > relativity as opposed to the ether of Lorentz consists in this, that > > > > the state of the former is at every place determined by connections > > > > with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, > > > > which are amenable to law in the form of differential equations; > > > > whereas the state of the Lorentzian ether in the absence of > > > > electromagnetic fields is conditioned by nothing outside itself, and > > > > is everywhere the same. The ether of the general theory of relativity > > > > is transmuted conceptually into the ether of Lorentz if we substitute > > > > constants for the functions of space which describe the former, > > > > disregarding the causes which condition its state." > > > >http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html > > > > > Einstein disregarded the causes which condition its state. > > > > > The displacement of aether by matter is the cause which conditions > > > > its state. > > > > Time is a concept. The rate at which an atomic clock ticks has nothing > > > to do with time. > > > > "Space and time are not conditions in which we live; they are simply > > > modes in which we think." - Albert Einstein > > >http://lazyway.blogs.com/lazy_way/2005/09/einstein_quote_.html > > > The following is an image of the aether's state of displacement as > > determined by its connections with the matter: > > >http://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2005/11/16/16nov_gpb_resou... > > The following is an image of the aether's state of displacement as > determined by its connections with the matter: > > http://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2005/11/16/16nov_gpb_resou... http://home.netcom.com/~sbyers11/ Quote from Albert A Michelson's lecture circa 1899. "Suppose that an aether strain corresponds to an electric charge, an aether displacement to the electric current, aether vortices to the atoms; if we continue these suppositions, we arrive at what may be one of the grandest generalizations of modern science, namely that all the phenomena of the physical universe are only different manifestations of the various modes of motion of one all-pervading (substance), the aether. The day seems not to distant when the converging lines from many apparently remote regions of thought will meet on some common ground. Then the nature of the atom and the forces called into play in their chemical union, the interactions between these atoms and the non- differentiated aether as manifested in the phenomena of light and electricity , the structure of the molecule, the explanation of cohesion, elasticity and gravitation, all of these will be marshaled into a single compact and consistent body of scientific knowledge." I would modify the statement to read: "all the phenomena of the physical universe are only different manifestations of the various states of one all-pervading (substance), the aether." http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html Albert Einstein: "the state of the former is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places" I would enhance the statement to read: The state of the aether as determined by the connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the aether's state of displacement.
From: spudnik on 22 Apr 2010 19:51 none of these extensive quotations relates to your so-called theory; so, make some sort of an interesting or testable statment, that requires the use of this peridiluvian aetherfluff. can you explain the existence of antimatter, or whether Univere should be made, half of it? you certainly are not much at explaining Young's experiment; perhaps you might read Young's explanation. stop Waxman's capNtrade TeraBailout of Wall St. and The City! (see my sig.) thus: that formula was not from Coriolis; it was Leibniz's "vis viva," where, before, hacks like Galileo didn't use the second powering of the velocity. thus: aren't you referring to Maxwell's Demon, a merely thought experiment. yes, "preactically," there is no vacuum -- just get Pascal to see that! well, you seem to really believe in your tiny theory, interestingly; it just doesn't go any where. > The mechanism by which vacuum chambers can get out the > matter isn't the power of the suction, it is the random motion of the > individual atoms that remain inside the chambers, AND the > functionality of the valve that keeps the evacuated matter out. > Practically speaking, there is no 'perfect' vacuum. Interestingly, thus: as the only known (to me) student of Bucky, I say, he was Are Buckafka Fullofit on pi ... but, dood, do you know the surfer's value?... it's not in _Synergetics_: http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/synergetics.html > Bucky Fuller explained that nature doesn't think pi is 3.1416... thus: this reminds me of the old Ultraviolet Catastrophe, when you take Hubble's opinion about the redshift, being directly related to speeding-away ... and there is no antilight; only antimatter. what lies within the visible universe is still very, very hard to elaborate, at very high redshifts, but there are plenty of goofy theories. thus: unfortuantely for Olber, almost all of Universe is red- shifted out of visible spectra, including most blue- shifters, due supposedly to Hubble's being hounded into saying that the shift is "Dopplerian." thus: the main, supposedly unsolved anomaly is that the winters & nights are "warmer" than the days and summers. now, how on Earth could that, be? the problem is that, although the GCMs are frought with nearly irreducible uncertainties re clouds & vapor, virtually all of the changes that effect these are made by men on land; whereas the hydro cycle at sea is some- what more of a constant. that's why, they call it, the Anthropocene (viz, the typical passive solar take on the urban heat islands, and the UNIPCC's supposed fudge-factor to cover them, which never seems to come-up in the actual articles in the actual journals). thus: R. Bucky Fuller was a funny guy, and your spiel about orbit is a perfect counter to his blather about pi. on the other hand, the vast majority of earth scientists don't know spherical trig., which Bucky did, in the command of a naval vessel, just before radio came in (in their GCMs etc., the poles are singularities, as in a Mercator projection ... but the space-science folks are *all* about the poles .-) see color plates one & two in _Synergetics_. http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/synergetics.html thus: space-time is merely ordinary phase-space, properly seen, a la Lanczos' use of quaternions -- Death to the lightcone; long-live the lightcone-heads! so, are biquaternions non-associative, like octonions? poor Minkowski, made his bizzare slogan about time *qua* the graphed *function* on a piece of paper, and then he died, and that ain't electronics *or* rocketscience (like Bucky saith, It is *all* rocketscience .-) the great geometer Minkowski, alas, puts his pants on, one lightcone at a time, like any one else. --No Cap and Trade Bailout for Wall Street and The City! to whom it concerns; as I comprehend it, after briefly speaking with Waxman at UCLA, his bill does the same as his '91 cap&trade bill under HW, on SO2 and NOx (viz, acid rain); that is, it is just a nostrum of "frere trade." if Dubya had known that Kyoto was just another cap&trade "free trade" nostrum, he'd have signed it, since he has been thoroughly indoctrinated in the MBA school on "British Liberal Free Trade" (cotton, sugar & slavery, why the British organized and supported Secession with ships & materiel) -- what the Revolution was about -- not just, Taxation without representation, a la the Tea Party effetes and the Encyclopedia Brittaninca! Waxman perhaps has been too long on the job; when I spoke to him at the Faculty Center, he seemed to be on drugs, a marked difference form when I saw him in P.Palisades. anyway, as I asked him, Why can't we just have a very small Carbon Tax, instead of letting the arbitrageurs run the bull & bear hijinx? as they say, the bears make money, the bulls make money, and the hogs always get slaughtered. none of the (two) experts, I have read or asked, thought that a tax wouldn't work as well, just that it was somehow politically impossible. --sooner,bri
From: mpc755 on 22 Apr 2010 20:01
Aether and matter are different states of the same material. Aether is displaced by matter. Displacement creates pressure. Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter. 'Frictionless supersolid a step closer' http://www.physorg.com/news185201084.html "Superfluidity and superconductivity cause particles to move without friction. Koos Gubbels investigated under what conditions such particles keep moving endlessly without losing energy, like a swimmer who takes one mighty stroke and then keeps gliding forever along the swimming pool." In the analogy the swimmer is any body and the water is the aether. Just as the swimmer displaces the water, whether the swimmer is at rest with respect to the water, or not, a body displaces the aether, whether the body is at rest with respect to the aether, or not. In the analogy the moving swimmer creates a displacement wave in the water. A moving body creates a displacement wave in the aether. 'On the super-fluid property of the relativistic physical vacuum medium and the inertial motion of particles' http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0701/0701155.pdf "Abstract: The similarity between the energy spectra of relativistic particles and that of quasi-particles in super-conductivity BCS theory makes us conjecture that the relativistic physical vacuum medium as the ground state of the background field is a super fluid medium, and the rest mass of a relativistic particle is like the energy gap of a quasi-particle. This conjecture is strongly supported by the results of our following investigation: a particle moving through the vacuum medium at a speed less than the speed of light in vacuum, though interacting with the vacuum medium, never feels friction force and thus undergoes a frictionless and inertial motion." A particle in the super fluid medium displaces the super fluid medium, whether the particle is at rest with respect to the super fluid medium, or not. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in the super fluid medium. A particle in the aether displaces the aether, whether the particle is at rest with respect to the aether, or not. The particle could be an individual nucleus. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in the aether. Aether is displaced by an individual nucleus. When discussing gravity as the pressure associated with the aether displaced by matter, what is being discussed is the aether being displaced by each and every nucleus which is the matter which is the object. 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory Louis de BROGLIE' http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf "I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case of an external field acting on the particle." "This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite natural that the internal motion rythm of the particle should always be the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is located." de Broglie's definition of wave-particle duality is of a physical wave and a physical particle. The particle occupies a very small region of the wave. In Aether Displacement (AD), the external field is the aether. In a double slit experiment the particle occupies a very small region of the wave and enters and exits a single slit. The wave enters and exits the available slits. A C-60 molecule displaces the aether. A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double slit experiment. The associated aether displacement wave enters and exits the available slits. When the aether displacement wave exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the associated aether displacement wave (i.e. turns it into chop) and there is no interference. The Casimir Effect is caused by gravity. Each and every nucleus which is the matter which is the plate displaces the aether. The aether displaced by one plate extends past the other plate. The pressure exerted by the aether displaced by the plates forces the plates together. 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory Louis de BROGLIE' http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf "These are essentially based on the way in which quantities respectively characterizing the regular v wave and the internal u0 wave of the particle connect with the neighbourhood of the singular region. u0 would have to increase very sharply as one penetrates the singular region." This is similar to Einstein's concept of: 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein' http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places". There is a connectedness between the particle and the neighborhood. There is a connectedness between the matter and the aether. The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the aether's state of displacement. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. EINSTEIN' http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is energy. In AD, mass is conserved. The rate at which an atomic clock 'ticks' is based upon the aether pressure in which it exists. In terms of motion, the speed of a GPS satellite with respect to the aether causes it to displace more aether and for that aether to exert more pressure on the clock in the GPS satellite than the aether pressure associated with a clock at rest with respect to the Earth. This causes the GPS satellite clock to "result in a delay of about 7 ìs/day". The aether pressure associated with the aether displaced by the Earth exerts less pressure on the GPS satellite than a similar clock at rest on the Earth "causing the GPS clocks to appear faster by about 45 ìs/day". The aether pressure associated with the speed at which the GPS satellite moves with respect to the aether and the aether pressure associated with the aether displaced by the Earth causes "clocks on the GPS satellites [to] tick approximately 38 ìs/day faster than clocks on the ground." (quoted text from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_relativity_on_GPS). The state of the aether is determined by its connections with the matter which is the Earth. This means the aether is less connected to the Earth where the airplanes fly in the 'Hafele and Keating Experiment' than it is to the surface of the Earth. If you looked up from the surface of the Earth to 'see' the aether it would appear as if the aether were 'flowing' east to west compared to the surface of the Earth. The aether is still 'flowing' west to east but not at the same rate as the surface of the Earth. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/HBASE/Relativ/airtim.html "Relative to the atomic time scale of the U.S. Naval Observatory, the flying clocks lost 59+/-10 nanoseconds during the eastward trip and gained 273+/-7 nanosecond during the westward trip, where the errors are the corresponding standard deviations." Flying with the Earth's rotation, eastward, is flying against the 'flow' of aether, relative to the surface of the Earth, causing a greater aether pressure on the atomic clock causing the atomic clock to tick slower. Flying against the Earth's rotation, westward, is flying with the 'flow' of aether, relative to the surface of the Earth, causing a lower aether pressure on the atomic clock causing the atomic clock to tick faster. There is a train and an embankment. "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places" - Albert Einstein Relative to the train and the embankment the state of the aether is most determined by its connections with the matter which is the Earth. This means the aether is more 'localized' with respect to the embankment than it is to the train. Three Observers get together at M'. They each hold an atomic clock. They synchronize their clocks. One Observer begins to walk to B'. As the Observer walks to B' the observer, and the clock, are walking against the 'flow' of aether. This increases the aether pressure on the clock and causes the clock to tick slower. The Observer walking the clock to A' is walking with the 'flow' of aether which reduces the pressure associated with the aether on the atomic clock and the atomic clock ticks faster. When the Observers get to A' and B' their clocks are once again under the same amount of aether pressure as is the clock at M' and all three clocks tick at the same rate. Let's assume the clocks at A', M', and B' read 12:00:05, 12:00:03, and 12:00:01 respectively when they are at A', M', and B'. A flash of light occurs at A/A' and B/B'. The light arrives at M simultaneously. The flash of light occurs at B' when the clock at B' reads 12:00:01. The flash of light occurs at A' when the clock at A' reads 12:00:05. The light from B' propagates with the 'flow' of aether and takes 5 seconds to reach M'. The light from A' propagates against the 'flow' of aether and takes 9 seconds to reach M'. The light from the lightning strike at B/B' arrives at M' when the clock at M' reads 12:00:08. The light from the lightning strike at A/A' arrives at M' when the clock at M' reads 12:00:12. The three Observers get back together to discuss the experiment. The Observer at B' says the flash at B' occurred at 12:00:01. The Observer at A' says the flash of light at A' occurred at 12:00:05. The Observer at M' says the flash from B' arrived at 12:00:08 and the flash from A' arrived at 12:00:12. The Observers conclude the lightning strikes were not simultaneous and the light propagated at 'c' from B' to M' and propagated at 'c' from A' to M' and both sets of light waves took 7 seconds to arrive at M'. If the Observers on the train knew their state with respect to the state of the aether then the Observers would have been able to determine the rate at which their clocks ticked as they were walked to A' and B' and they would have been able to conclude the lightning strikes occurred simultaneously, in nature. Light propagates at 'c' with respect to the aether. The following is an explanation of what occurs in nature in a 'delayed choice quantum eraser' experiment. Following the explanation are two experiments which will provide evidence of Aether Displacement. In the image on the right here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_choice_quantum_eraser#The_experiment When the downgraded photon pair are created, in order for there to be conservation of momentum, the original photons momentum is maintained. This means the downgraded photon pair have opposite angular momentums. We will describe one of the photons as being the 'up' photon and the other photon as being the 'down' photon. One of the downgraded photons travels either the red or blue path towards D0 and the other photon travels either the red or blue path towards the prism. There are physical waves in the aether propagating both the red and blue paths. The aether waves propagating towards D0 interact with the lens and create interference prior to reaching D0. The aether waves create interference which alters the direction the photon travels prior to reaching D0. There are actually two interference patterns being created at D0. One associated with the 'up' photons when they arrive at D0 and the other interference pattern associated with the 'down' photons when they arrive at D0. Both 'up' and 'down' photons are reflected by BSa and arrive at D3. Since there is a single path towards D3 there is nothing for the wave in the aether to interfere with and there is no interference pattern and since it is not determined if it is an 'up' or 'down' photon being detected at D3 there is no way to distinguish between the photons arriving at D0 which interference pattern each photon belongs to. The same for photons reflected by BSb and arrive at D4. Photons which pass through BSa and are reflected by BSc and arrive at D1 are either 'up' or 'down' photons but not both. If 'up' photons arrive at D1 then 'down' photons arrive at D2. The opposite occurs for photons which pass through BSb. Photons which pass through BSa and pass through BSb and arrive at D1 are all either 'up' or 'down' photons. If all 'up' photons arrive at D1 then all 'down' photons arrive at D2. Since the physical waves in the aether traveling both the red and blue paths are combined prior to D1 and D2 the aether waves create interference which alters the direction the photon travels. Since all 'up' photons arrive at one of the detectors and all 'down' photons arrive at the other an interference pattern is created which reflects back to the interference both sets of photons are creating at D0. Figures 3 and 4 here: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/9903/9903047v1.pdf Show the interference pattern of the 'up' and 'down' photons. If you were to combine the two images and add the peaks together and add the valleys together you would have the interference pattern of the original photon. This is evidence the downgraded photon pair maintain the original photons momentum and have opposite angular momentums. Nothing is erased. There is no delayed choice. Physical waves in the aether are traveling both the red and blue paths and when the paths are combined the waves create interference which alters the direction the photon 'particle' travels. Experiments which will provide evidence of Aether Displacement: Experiment #1: Instead of having a single beam splitter BSc have two beam splitters BSca and BScb. Have the photons reflected by mirror Ma interact with BSca and have the photons reflected by mirror Mb interact with BScb. Do not combine the red and blue paths. Have additional detectors D1a, D2a, D1b, and D2b. Have the photons reflected by and propagate through BSca be detected at D1a and D2a. Have the photons reflected by and propagate through BScb be detected at D1b and D2b. If you compare the photons detected at D1a and D1b with the photons detected at D0, the corresponding photons detected at D0 will form an interference pattern. If you compare the photons detected at D2a and D2b with the photons detected at D0, the corresponding photons detected at D0 will form an interference pattern. What is occurring is all 'up' photons are being detected at one pair of detectors, for example D1a and D1b, and all 'down' photons are being detected at the other pair of detectors, for example D2a and D2b. Interference patterns do not even need to be created in order to 'go back' and determine the interference patterns created at D0. Experiment #2: Alter the experiment. When the downgraded photon pair are created, have each photon interact with its own double slit apparatus. Have detectors at one of the exits for each double slit apparatus. When a photon is detected at one of the exits, in AD, the photon's aether wave still exists and is propagating along the path exiting the other slit. When a photon is not detected at one of the exits, the photon 'particle' along with its associated aether wave exits the other slit. Combine the path the aether wave the detected photon is propagating along with the path of the other photon and its associated aether wave. An interference pattern will still be created. This shows the aether wave of a detected photon still exists and is able to create interference with the aether wave of another photon, altering the direction the photon 'particle' travels. |