An apology to Androcles
in [Relativity]
|
From: Helmut Wabnig hwabnig on 3 Aug 2010 07:17 On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 12:54:17 -0700 (PDT), PD <thedraperfamily(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Jul 31, 8:54�am, Uncle Ben <b...(a)greenba.com> wrote: >> On Jul 30, 11:31�pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Uncle Ben wrote: >> >> > [...] >> >> > The androcles lost the ability to reason with people long ago. >> >> You may be right, Eric. �It takes integrity to admit error. �I thought >> that if the truth were spelled out with such clarity that even his >> lion could understand it, Androcles might man up enough to display >> some integrity and recover some respect. �Otherwise, it is killfile >> time. > >That seems best. I've seen Androcles stick to a claim that 2 = 1/2 in >the past. Einstein divided by ZERO, said the lionkeeper....in the past. w.
From: Androcles on 3 Aug 2010 07:40 "Helmut Wabnig" <hwabnig@ .- --- -. dotat> wrote in message news:8kuf5694d6ib9lcdreafmu0omlint9bmih(a)4ax.com... | On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 12:54:17 -0700 (PDT), PD | <thedraperfamily(a)gmail.com> wrote: | | >On Jul 31, 8:54 am, Uncle Ben <b...(a)greenba.com> wrote: | >> On Jul 30, 11:31 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: | >> | >> > Uncle Ben wrote: | >> | >> > [...] | >> | >> > The androcles lost the ability to reason with people long ago. | >> | >> You may be right, Eric. It takes integrity to admit error. I thought | >> that if the truth were spelled out with such clarity that even his | >> lion could understand it, Androcles might man up enough to display | >> some integrity and recover some respect. Otherwise, it is killfile | >> time. | > | >That seems best. I've seen Androcles stick to a claim that 2 = 1/2 in | >the past. | | Einstein divided by ZERO, said the lionkeeper....in the past. | Not difficult to understand, Wabnigga. c = limit as h tends to zero of [f(x+h) - f(x)] / h "Hence if x' be taken infinitesimally small" -- Einstein. "the velocity of light in our theory plays the part, physically, of an infinitely great velocity". -- Einstein. t = x/c = (not much)/infinity = 0. tau = integral [dtau/dt].dt for t = 0 to 0. The boneheaded trolls never had the ability to reason and never learned mathematics. Einstein divided by zero, ewe cretin.
From: PD on 3 Aug 2010 11:23 On Aug 3, 6:40 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > "Helmut Wabnig" <hwabnig@ .- --- -. dotat> wrote in messagenews:8kuf5694d6ib9lcdreafmu0omlint9bmih(a)4ax.com... > | On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 12:54:17 -0700 (PDT), PD| <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > | > | >On Jul 31, 8:54 am, Uncle Ben <b...(a)greenba.com> wrote: > | >> On Jul 30, 11:31 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > | >> > | >> > Uncle Ben wrote: > | >> > | >> > [...] > | >> > | >> > The androcles lost the ability to reason with people long ago. > | >> > | >> You may be right, Eric. It takes integrity to admit error. I thought > | >> that if the truth were spelled out with such clarity that even his > | >> lion could understand it, Androcles might man up enough to display > | >> some integrity and recover some respect. Otherwise, it is killfile > | >> time. > | > > | >That seems best. I've seen Androcles stick to a claim that 2 = 1/2 in > | >the past. > | > | Einstein divided by ZERO, said the lionkeeper....in the past. > | > > Not difficult to understand, Wabnigga. > c = limit as h tends to zero of [f(x+h) - f(x)] / h Calculus and the notion of a differential limit eludes certain people. > > "Hence if x' be taken infinitesimally small" -- Einstein. > "the velocity of light in our theory plays the part, physically, of an > infinitely great velocity". -- Einstein. > t = x/c = (not much)/infinity = 0. > tau = integral [dtau/dt].dt for t = 0 to 0. > > The boneheaded trolls never had the ability to reason and never learned > mathematics. I think calculus and the definition of a derivative counts as mathematics. > Einstein divided by zero, ewe cretin.
From: Helmut Wabnig hwabnig on 3 Aug 2010 12:53 On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:40:44 +0100, "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > >"Helmut Wabnig" <hwabnig@ .- --- -. dotat> wrote in message >news:8kuf5694d6ib9lcdreafmu0omlint9bmih(a)4ax.com... >| On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 12:54:17 -0700 (PDT), PD >| <thedraperfamily(a)gmail.com> wrote: >| >| >On Jul 31, 8:54 am, Uncle Ben <b...(a)greenba.com> wrote: >| >> On Jul 30, 11:31 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >| >> >| >> > Uncle Ben wrote: >| >> >| >> > [...] >| >> >| >> > The androcles lost the ability to reason with people long ago. >| >> >| >> You may be right, Eric. It takes integrity to admit error. I thought >| >> that if the truth were spelled out with such clarity that even his >| >> lion could understand it, Androcles might man up enough to display >| >> some integrity and recover some respect. Otherwise, it is killfile >| >> time. >| > >| >That seems best. I've seen Androcles stick to a claim that 2 = 1/2 in >| >the past. >| >| Einstein divided by ZERO, said the lionkeeper....in the past. >| > >Not difficult to understand, Wabnigga. >c = limit as h tends to zero of [f(x+h) - f(x)] / h > >"Hence if x' be taken infinitesimally small" -- Einstein. >"the velocity of light in our theory plays the part, physically, of an >infinitely great velocity". -- Einstein. >t = x/c = (not much)/infinity = 0. >tau = integral [dtau/dt].dt for t = 0 to 0. > >The boneheaded trolls never had the ability to reason and never learned >mathematics. >Einstein divided by zero, ewe cretin. > Androcles, the educationally subnormal. Calculating "limits" has nothing to do with DIVISION BY ZERO! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_of_a_function Andro, this has been explained to you a zillion times: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LHospitalsRule.html No division by Zero, Andro! NO DIVISION BY ZERO, Androcles! N O D I V I S I ON B Y Z E R O Mr. Androcles! M I S T E R A N D R O C L E S !!!! w.
From: Androcles on 3 Aug 2010 14:08
"Helmut Wabnig" <hwabnig@ .- --- -. dotat> wrote in message news:muhg56tlfmnr9j968ip270e3rdi79j865g(a)4ax.com... | On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:40:44 +0100, "Androcles" | <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: | | > | >"Helmut Wabnig" <hwabnig@ .- --- -. dotat> wrote in message | >news:8kuf5694d6ib9lcdreafmu0omlint9bmih(a)4ax.com... | >| On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 12:54:17 -0700 (PDT), PD | >| <thedraperfamily(a)gmail.com> wrote: | >| | >| >On Jul 31, 8:54 am, Uncle Ben <b...(a)greenba.com> wrote: | >| >> On Jul 30, 11:31 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: | >| >> | >| >> > Uncle Ben wrote: | >| >> | >| >> > [...] | >| >> | >| >> > The androcles lost the ability to reason with people long ago. | >| >> | >| >> You may be right, Eric. It takes integrity to admit error. I thought | >| >> that if the truth were spelled out with such clarity that even his | >| >> lion could understand it, Androcles might man up enough to display | >| >> some integrity and recover some respect. Otherwise, it is killfile | >| >> time. | >| > | >| >That seems best. I've seen Androcles stick to a claim that 2 = 1/2 in | >| >the past. | >| | >| Einstein divided by ZERO, said the lionkeeper....in the past. | >| | > | >Not difficult to understand, Wabnigga. | >c = limit as h tends to zero of [f(x+h) - f(x)] / h | > | >"Hence if x' be taken infinitesimally small" -- Einstein. | >"the velocity of light in our theory plays the part, physically, of an | >infinitely great velocity". -- Einstein. | >t = x/c = (not much)/infinity = 0. | >tau = integral [dtau/dt].dt for t = 0 to 0. | > | >The boneheaded trolls never had the ability to reason and never learned | >mathematics. | >Einstein divided by zero, ewe cretin. | > | | Androcles, the educationally subnormal. | | Calculating "limits" has nothing to do with DIVISION BY ZERO! | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_of_a_function | | | Andro, this has been explained to you a zillion times: | http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LHospitalsRule.html | | | No division by Zero, | Andro! | | NO DIVISION BY ZERO, | Androcles! | | N O D I V I S I ON B Y Z E R O | Mr. Androcles! | | M I S T E R A N D R O C L E S !!!! | | w. "Hence if x' be taken infinitesimally small" -- Einstein. That's not L'Hospital's Rule!!!!!!!!!! What's that for, Missus Fuckwad!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ? |