Prev: A Finite Model of Peano Arithmetic
Next: aspects of the AP-adics book that I lose #485 Correcting Math
From: plutomedes archonium on 5 Mar 2010 15:59
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes(a)gmail.com> writes:

> And the lawyer says that I have to go through NANA to remove the
> forgery. And if NANA does not remove the forgeries then the Courts
> will remove Marc and NANA administrators for failing to do their
> job.

You might oughta look for another lawyer.

> NANA needs to review Signature Blocks. NANA, to their credit,
> cleaned up FROM lines of forgery. But now it needs to clean up
> signature blocks of forgery.

What makes you think NANA has prevented From line forgeries?

(Note: Obviously, I am not plutomedes archonium nor am I posting from
wumphida.org.)

--
Jesse F. Hughes

"Please. I was a philosophy major. Nobody can 'know' anything. And
I DO know." -- George Greene embarrasses philosophy majors everywhere.
From: Mad as a Box of Frogs on 5 Mar 2010 17:45
In article <87wrxqrh8x.fsf(a)phiwumbda.org>,
Jesse F. Hughes <jesse(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote:
>Mad as a Box of Frogs <Dydd.Iau.march4th(a)AD.2010> writes:
>
>> I don't get it. Is this the same AP from 20 years ago?
>> What's he doing posting from Google? How could a forgery
>> this late in the game trigger such a naive response when
>> the 'real' AP took on Sarfatti and Hannu?
>
>Just to be clear: AP's claims are utterly spurious. I have not forged
>his posts. My posting address is in the From header and the quotation
>is clearly indicated as a quotation (just as in this post).
>
>AP is claiming that in a post like this, I'm trying to fool people
>into believing that (in this case) James S. Harris wrote the post. It
>is an utterly silly complaint.

Not my department, this is and lingerie and bras.


>I'm not sure why you think that naive "reasoning" from AP is
>surprising. I guess you have a little more respect for the King of
>All Science than I do.


Here we go then. Sending a subpoena to NANA challenges any definition
for reasoning naive or otherwise.

I'm not ruling out attrition of grey matter and will again point out
that AP has a 20 yr history of doing battle and ahem, "song" writing.
Threatening a Usenet newsgroup however? Only for "birdbrains".

Something's fishy.

To wit: Net Legends FAQ
Archimedes/Ludwig Plutonium (This newsgroup is contained inside a
plutonium electron):

"When will you publishers stop propagandizing for speculative ideas
such as the big bang and black holes? When they are discovered not to
exist, what rationale will you use, since you plastered your magazine
full of this nonsense? You are the publicity agents for birdbrain
professors of physics."






--
Master of Puppets We are all Rich Rosen
DENSA Life Achievement � Am I the only one with half a brain?
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: A Finite Model of Peano Arithmetic
Next: aspects of the AP-adics book that I lose #485 Correcting Math