From: FromTheRafters on 24 Jul 2010 15:05 "Slarty" <plink.1RoyTubb(a)spamgourmet.net> wrote in message news:1v3v9xibzirpf.10rszoflfdsef.dlg(a)40tude.net... > On 23 Jul 2010 14:05:25 -0700, Bill wrote: > >> In article <3qcj46ho8v2510nchr1shm2nkojti4rdvo(a)4ax.com>, Tecknomage >> says... >> >>>Here is my list (and evaluation) of AntiVirus programs: >> >> >> Which that a a nickel is just about worth a nickel. > > Translation into English please. Back when a cup of coffee cost a dime, there was a saying: "That, and a dime, will get you a cup of coffee." It is a way for someone to imply that something was considered worthless. Actually, I thought Technomage's post was a good one (but worthless to me).
From: FromTheRafters on 24 Jul 2010 15:06 "Bill" <wsblevins(a)runbox.com> wrote in message news:i2d08p0nb5(a)drn.newsguy.com... > In article <i2cqo0$rr8$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, FromTheRafters > says... > >>Linux is an OS *not* an AV. > > > Precisely...and it doesn't require an AV. Neither does Windows.
From: Slarty on 25 Jul 2010 12:18 On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:05:38 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote: > It is a way for someone to imply that something was considered > worthless. Thanks for the explanation, but the original wasn't in comprehensible English. Try translating it into any other language without the benefit of your explanation Cheers, Roy
From: Hank Nussbacher on 26 Jul 2010 01:49 In article <pa1k46the18e8f42p842tsl3gkrim79u9j(a)4ax.com>, FredW <fredw(a)blackholespam.net> wrote: >On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:39:18 -0400, "David H. Lipman" ><DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote: >>From: "Tecknomage" <tecknode(a)NOSPAM.com> >> >>| In article <4c3f189f$0$22512$607ed4bc(a)cv.net>, Tom says... >>>> > >>>> >Can anyone tell me the best Anti-Virus program? >> > >> >>| 1) Norton AntiVirus (by Symantec) (my rating 3/4) > >> >>| 2) McAfee AntiVirus (my rating 4/4) > >> >>| 3) BitDefender AntiVirus 2009 (my rating 2/4) > >> >>| 4) ESET NOD32 AntiVirus (my rating 1/4) Why not use Av-comparatives which is objective: http://www.av-comparatives.org/comparativesreviews/main-tests http://www.av-comparatives.org/images/stories/test/ondret/avc_report26.pdf -Hank
From: Tecknomage on 26 Jul 2010 13:09 On 23 Jul 2010 14:06:33 -0700, Bill <wsblevins(a)runbox.com> wrote: > In article <i2cqo0$rr8$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, FromTheRafters says... > > >Linux is an OS *not* an AV. > > > Precisely...and it doesn't require an AV. I run Ubuntu 10.04 (Linux Desktop) on my Laptop, and it COMES with "ClamAV" via Ubuntu Repositories. Also, refer to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_malware As Linux becomes more popular.... http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3601946 -- ======== Tecknomage ======== Computer Systems Specialist IT Technician San Diego, CA
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: The Security Suite/TT Livescan Next: New (but really - old) Windows .lnk vulnerability |