From: Baho Utot on 7 Apr 2010 19:47 Sidney Lambe wrote: > On comp.os.linux.misc, Baho Utot <baho-utot(a)invalid.com> wrote: >> Sidney Lambe wrote: >> >>> On comp.os.linux.misc, Mark Hobley >>> <markhobley(a)hotpop.donottypethisbit.com> wrote: >>> >>> [delete] >>> >>>> I am quite surprised at how few console mode applications are >>>> available on Linux. >>> >>> ????????!!!! >>> >>> Let's see. I don't run X on this box at all. I surf the web with >>> a browser (links2) which displays images and does javascript >>> (though I don't) and frames and so forth. I edit images. I do >>> mail and news and ssh and telnet and IRC and IM and run a web >>> server and an FTP server and display and edit and create PDF >>> files and run a packet sniffer and have an excellent text editor >>> and create web pages and compile complex software and download >>> music from a certain well-known file-sharing network. I have a >>> superb window manager (GNU screen -- 9 open windows at present >>> -- no mouse involved and it has cut&paste capabilities that far >>> exceed anything available in a GUI window manager.) >>> >>> Currently using 43MB of RAM and 2% of my CPU's capacity with >>> a system load average of 7%. >>> >>> I have 964 executable binaries on my box, and none of them >>> require a GUI. >>> >>> I'd guess that there are probably another 10,000+ console apps >>> easily available for free. >>> >>> I suggest you check out sourceforge.net and ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/ >>> just for starters. >>> >>> Sid >> >> Why? > > Wow. Someone who is even stupider than the guy I responded to > here. I wouldn't have thought that was possible. > > <plonk> > > Sid Oh wow, I've been plonked by the Sid again! Seeing that he doesn't read my replies how is that possible? |