Anybody use Linux? For old hardware, which distro?
in [Setup]
|
From: Keith Keller on 3 Jun 2010 17:45 On 2010-06-03, The Natural Philosopher <tnp(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > > Your sig is borked BTW > > vvvvvvvvvvv >> --keith That's not part of my .sig. --keith vvv it starts here -- kkeller-usenet(a)wombat.san-francisco.ca.us (try just my userid to email me) AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt see X- headers for PGP signature information
From: The Natural Philosopher on 3 Jun 2010 18:32 Keith Keller wrote: > On 2010-06-03, The Natural Philosopher <tnp(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: >> Your sig is borked BTW >> >> vvvvvvvvvvv >>> --keith > > That's not part of my .sig. > then why prefix it with --keith are you less than a normal keith? What's wrong with keith--;-) > --keith > > > vvv it starts here
From: Keith Keller on 3 Jun 2010 23:14 On 2010-06-03, The Natural Philosopher <tnp(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > > What's wrong with keith--;-) I need to make sure readers of my post get my value after the decrement! Perhaps I do need a better sign-off. keith!! (wait, who in their right mind wants double factorial of me?!?) -- kkeller-usenet(a)wombat.san-francisco.ca.us (try just my userid to email me) AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt see X- headers for PGP signature information
From: Mike Easter on 4 Jun 2010 01:05 Keith Keller wrote: > I need to make sure readers of my post get my value after the decrement! I read the Tibetan folktale that Chi-An edited about the shepherd who understood the language of animals. andsomeotherstuff Thanks. -- Mike Easter
From: David Brown on 4 Jun 2010 03:03
On 03/06/2010 22:28, Darren Salt wrote: > I demand that David Brown may or may not have written... > > [snip] >> The only time I have ever seen malware on any of the systems I am >> responsible for - mostly windows desktops of various kinds, plus Linux >> servers and the odd Linux desktop - was due to the weak point of any good >> security system - users. Users are the only part of the system that >> actually need regular updating. > > Unfortunately, installing the updates is tricky; come back the next day and > there's a fair chance that they've automatically rolled back. > > And don't get me started on rebooting them... > On the other hand, I find users respond to threats with a pair of wire cutters far better than computers do ! |