Arrow of Causality
in [Physics]
|
Prev: No mass (The only one) No real physics!!
Next: New Thread was Re: Holograms Re: Benefits was Re: Hazards was Re:Conversation was Re: School was Re: The Stage
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 2 Jul 2010 13:00 On Jul 2, 12:17 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/1/10 11:09 PM, Robert L. Oldershaw wrote: > > > Consider subatomic nuclei and galaxies. > > > Their radii and spin periods and oscillation periods are related by > > the discrete self-similar scaling laws [which are mathematical, by the > > way] of Discrete Scale Relativity [which is mathematical; it's General > > Relativity with a new discrete self-similar symmetry included]. > > Actually they are not! ---------------------------------------------- Put up or shut up. Let's see you prove your assertion. This should be amusing. RLO www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw
From: Sam Wormley on 2 Jul 2010 13:16 On 7/2/10 12:00 PM, Robert L. Oldershaw wrote: > On Jul 2, 12:17 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 7/1/10 11:09 PM, Robert L. Oldershaw wrote: >> >>> Consider subatomic nuclei and galaxies. >> >>> Their radii and spin periods and oscillation periods are related by >>> the discrete self-similar scaling laws [which are mathematical, by the >>> way] of Discrete Scale Relativity [which is mathematical; it's General >>> Relativity with a new discrete self-similar symmetry included]. >> >> Actually they are not! > ---------------------------------------------- > > Put up or shut up. > > Let's see you prove your assertion. > > This should be amusing. > > RLO > www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw > You first, bubba. Why is it that cranks and trolls never ever can support their theories with actual observational data. I don't know why you post in sci.physics, Oldershaw, but so far your posting record is all bluff and putting down other posters. You put up shut up, bubba!
From: Huang on 2 Jul 2010 14:02 On Jul 2, 12:16 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/2/10 12:00 PM, Robert L. Oldershaw wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 2, 12:17 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 7/1/10 11:09 PM, Robert L. Oldershaw wrote: > > >>> Consider subatomic nuclei and galaxies. > > >>> Their radii and spin periods and oscillation periods are related by > >>> the discrete self-similar scaling laws [which are mathematical, by the > >>> way] of Discrete Scale Relativity [which is mathematical; it's General > >>> Relativity with a new discrete self-similar symmetry included]. > > >> Actually they are not! > > ---------------------------------------------- > > > Put up or shut up. > > > Let's see you prove your assertion. > > > This should be amusing. > > > RLO > >www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw > > You first, bubba. Why is it that cranks and trolls never ever can > support their theories with actual observational data. I don't know > why you post in sci.physics, Oldershaw, but so far your posting > record is all bluff and putting down other posters. You put up shut > up, bubba!- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - OMG this line of "research" is really going places ............
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 2 Jul 2010 23:02
On Jul 2, 1:16 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > You first, bubba. Why is it that cranks and trolls never ever can > support their theories with actual observational data. I don't know > why you post in sci.physics, Oldershaw, but so far your posting > record is all bluff and putting down other posters. You put up shut > up, bubba!- Hide quoted text - ------------------------------------------------------ 39 empirical tests of fundamental properties of particles, atoms, stars and galaxies can be found at: www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw Published papers can be found at: http://arxiv.org/a/oldershaw_r_1 You can read, right? Can you read and think too ? I can show a mountain of evidence. You have still offered nothing but wind. RLO |