Assumption of length contraction in original theory
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: WE don't need God. All we need is nutty physics that we can call genius
Next: LHC won't see the new colliding particles to form a Black Hole.
From: Igor on 7 Jun 2010 18:30 On Jun 6, 2:57 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 6, 7:05 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 5, 2:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 5, 10:57 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 3, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > This assumption must be challenged. It is part of particle > > > > > acceleration physics. But how do we know what the particle > > > > > experiences? It is a fact that we don't. And our trains have never > > > > > been observed to shrink either. > > > > > > It is simple. If atoms size contracts along the direction of motion > > > > > then atoms physics can be proven to fail due to lopsidedness of the > > > > > forces within the atom itself. > > > > > > There are No Flattened atoms. Who wants to challenge it? > > > > > They remain spherical. > > > > > And you remain an ignorant twit. > > > > Flat atoms fail because the forces inside of them become lopsided. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > Maybe you could explain just what the hell that means. I can't seem > > to find any such ridiculous statement in the literature. You need to > > be very thankful for usenet, else you'd be ranting and raving about > > your silly concepts on a dirty street corner.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > The dimensions of the matter forces change. They are no longer > spherically symmetrical. The whole atom size becomes lopsided. > > Mitch Raemsch You left out that part about the beeblebrontz zorjniffing the gribbowaxem, resulting in a catastrophic effenzorch!
From: BURT on 7 Jun 2010 18:48 On Jun 7, 3:30 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > On Jun 6, 2:57 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 6, 7:05 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 5, 2:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 5, 10:57 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 3, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > This assumption must be challenged. It is part of particle > > > > > > acceleration physics. But how do we know what the particle > > > > > > experiences? It is a fact that we don't. And our trains have never > > > > > > been observed to shrink either. > > > > > > > It is simple. If atoms size contracts along the direction of motion > > > > > > then atoms physics can be proven to fail due to lopsidedness of the > > > > > > forces within the atom itself. > > > > > > > There are No Flattened atoms. Who wants to challenge it? > > > > > > They remain spherical. > > > > > > And you remain an ignorant twit. > > > > > Flat atoms fail because the forces inside of them become lopsided. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > Maybe you could explain just what the hell that means. I can't seem > > > to find any such ridiculous statement in the literature. You need to > > > be very thankful for usenet, else you'd be ranting and raving about > > > your silly concepts on a dirty street corner.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > The dimensions of the matter forces change. They are no longer > > spherically symmetrical. The whole atom size becomes lopsided. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > You left out that part about the beeblebrontz zorjniffing the > gribbowaxem, resulting in a catastrophic effenzorch!- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - You mean I left out your nonsense? That's right. Lopsided atoms don't work. Just like lopsided marbles. Mitch Raemsch
From: Uncle Al on 7 Jun 2010 19:05 Igor wrote: > > On Jun 6, 2:57 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > On Jun 6, 7:05 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Jun 5, 2:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 5, 10:57 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 3, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > This assumption must be challenged. It is part of particle > > > > > > acceleration physics. But how do we know what the particle > > > > > > experiences? It is a fact that we don't. And our trains have never > > > > > > been observed to shrink either. > > > > > > > > It is simple. If atoms size contracts along the direction of motion > > > > > > then atoms physics can be proven to fail due to lopsidedness of the > > > > > > forces within the atom itself. > > > > > > > > There are No Flattened atoms. Who wants to challenge it? > > > > > > They remain spherical. > > > > > > > And you remain an ignorant twit. > > > > > > Flat atoms fail because the forces inside of them become lopsided. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > Maybe you could explain just what the hell that means. I can't seem > > > to find any such ridiculous statement in the literature. You need to > > > be very thankful for usenet, else you'd be ranting and raving about > > > your silly concepts on a dirty street corner.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > The dimensions of the matter forces change. They are no longer > > spherically symmetrical. The whole atom size becomes lopsided. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > You left out that part about the beeblebrontz zorjniffing the > gribbowaxem, resulting in a catastrophic effenzorch! effenzorchi, plural - conservation laws demand antimatter symmetries. Oh, wait... is it a Majorana effenzeroch? Never mind. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
From: BURT on 7 Jun 2010 19:15 On Jun 7, 4:05 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote: > Igor wrote: > > > On Jun 6, 2:57 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Jun 6, 7:05 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 5, 2:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 5, 10:57 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 3, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > This assumption must be challenged. It is part of particle > > > > > > > acceleration physics. But how do we know what the particle > > > > > > > experiences? It is a fact that we don't. And our trains have never > > > > > > > been observed to shrink either. > > > > > > > > It is simple. If atoms size contracts along the direction of motion > > > > > > > then atoms physics can be proven to fail due to lopsidedness of the > > > > > > > forces within the atom itself. > > > > > > > > There are No Flattened atoms. Who wants to challenge it? > > > > > > > They remain spherical. > > > > > > > And you remain an ignorant twit. > > > > > > Flat atoms fail because the forces inside of them become lopsided.. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > Maybe you could explain just what the hell that means. I can't seem > > > > to find any such ridiculous statement in the literature. You need to > > > > be very thankful for usenet, else you'd be ranting and raving about > > > > your silly concepts on a dirty street corner.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > The dimensions of the matter forces change. They are no longer > > > spherically symmetrical. The whole atom size becomes lopsided. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > You left out that part about the beeblebrontz zorjniffing the > > gribbowaxem, resulting in a catastrophic effenzorch! > > effenzorchi, plural - conservation laws demand antimatter symmetries. > Oh, wait... is it a Majorana effenzeroch? Never mind. > > -- > Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ > (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - How can a positron make it through the atmosphere without anihilating with one of the 100 quadrillion of electrons it would be attracted to? No. There is no anti matter. And I challenge anyone on that account. Mitch Raemsch
From: Uncle Al on 7 Jun 2010 19:15
Igor wrote: > > On Jun 6, 2:57 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > On Jun 6, 7:05 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Jun 5, 2:14 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 5, 10:57 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 3, 9:39 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > This assumption must be challenged. It is part of particle > > > > > > acceleration physics. But how do we know what the particle > > > > > > experiences? It is a fact that we don't. And our trains have never > > > > > > been observed to shrink either. > > > > > > > > It is simple. If atoms size contracts along the direction of motion > > > > > > then atoms physics can be proven to fail due to lopsidedness of the > > > > > > forces within the atom itself. > > > > > > > > There are No Flattened atoms. Who wants to challenge it? > > > > > > They remain spherical. > > > > > > > And you remain an ignorant twit. > > > > > > Flat atoms fail because the forces inside of them become lopsided. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > Maybe you could explain just what the hell that means. I can't seem > > > to find any such ridiculous statement in the literature. You need to > > > be very thankful for usenet, else you'd be ranting and raving about > > > your silly concepts on a dirty street corner.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > The dimensions of the matter forces change. They are no longer > > spherically symmetrical. The whole atom size becomes lopsided. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > You left out that part about the beeblebrontz zorjniffing the > gribbowaxem, resulting in a catastrophic effenzorch! effenzorchi, plural - conservation laws demand antimatter symmetries. Oh, wait... is it a Majorana effenzeroch? Never mind. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm |