From: Salmon Egg on 9 Feb 2010 18:14 In article <isw-EA8034.12253509022010@[216.168.3.50]>, isw <isw(a)witzend.com> wrote: > I expect it's not that, as you said, "Very few photos are posted that > are truly exposed and processed correctly", but that they *are* > "correct" when viewed on the computer used by the person who posted > them. The difference between the historical Mac gamma of 1.8 and the > usual PC gamma of 2.2 is enough to make an image which looks fine on a > PC appear very "flat" on a Mac. Setting up a color profile with a gamma > of 2.2 may be all it takes to make the images look just fine on your > computer. This is the most useful answer I have received. It is true that most of the pictures do look flat. If what you say is true, increasing the gamma might help and reduce the number of keystrokes required to "improve" the inmages. Bill -- An old man would be better off never having been born.
From: isw on 10 Feb 2010 00:32
In article <1jdnjsg.5fg0k6yvlxl4N%mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com>, mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com (Mike Rosenberg) wrote: > Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > You have not answered my question: How can one get auto repeat on a > > Control-Option-Command < (or >) combination? > > No, nor has anyone else. How about AppleScript? Isaac |