BBC tows the "company line" when it comes to police harassment
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Xmas Themes For Uploaded Photos
Next: Just out: 'Hot - Life in the Australian outback' - could use some help
From: Chris Malcolm on 11 Dec 2009 10:27 In rec.photo.digital Neil Harrington <never(a)home.com> wrote: > "Chris Malcolm" <cam(a)holyrood.ed.ac.uk> wrote in message > news:7ob3a1F280camU4(a)mid.individual.net... >> In rec.photo.digital Neil Harrington <never(a)home.com> wrote: >>> "Chris H" <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote in message >>> news:QP+y1eAwWtHLFANA(a)phaedsys.demon.co.uk... >>>> In message <JI2dnULj2eBiO4PWnZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, Neil >>>> Harrington <never(a)home.com> writes >>>>> >>>>>"Bob Larter" <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>news:4b1dc5db$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au... >>>>>> Neil Harrington wrote: >> >>>>>>> And of course Palin is known to have been born in the U.S., making >>>>>>> her >>>>>>> eligible to be president. No one seems to know for sure where Obama >>>>>>> was >>>>>>> born, but the overwhelming probability is that it was in Kenya -- >>>>>>> making >>>>>>> him the first American president constitutionally ineligible to be >>>>>>> president. >>>>>> >>>>>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHahahahahahahaha! So you're a 'Birther' as well. >>>>> >>>>>Pretty much, yes. Look at the known facts: >>>>> >>>>>1. His paternal grandmother insists she was present at his birth -- in >>>>>Kenya. >>>>> >>>>>2. We still have not seen his actual birth certificate, i.e. the >>>>>hospital >>>>>long form. >>>>> >>>>>3. His birth certificate is claimed to be in a sealed box under lock and >>>>>key. Alternatively, it is claimed to have been destroyed when Hawaii >>>>>computerized their records. In any case it is not available for anyone >>>>>to >>>>>see, and we have only a state official's assurance that it exists or >>>>>ever >>>>>existed in Hawaii. The official has not even made clear whether it was >>>>>the >>>>>actual hospital long form that she claims to have seen. >>>>> >>>>>4. The short form ("certificate of live birth") that was posted on some >>>>>Obama-supporting sites has been called a forgery, and there are some >>>>>reasons >>>>>to be suspicious of it (why is the certficate no. blacked out, for >>>>>example?), but reportedly such short certificates were easily obtained >>>>>on >>>>>request at that time in Hawaii anyway. >>>>> >>>>>5. The Honolulu hospital where his birth is claimed to have occurred >>>>>refuses >>>>>to confirm that he was (or was not) born there, saying they cannot give >>>>>out >>>>>this information without his permission. Evidently he has declined to >>>>>give >>>>>this permission, which would settle the matter instantly if he really >>>>>had >>>>>been born there. >>>>> >>>>>6. He has similarly refused to give permission for the release of his >>>>>school >>>>>and college records, which might also give his place of birth. >>>>> >>>>>And so on. >>>> >>>> It is a pretty sorry state of affairs when the best hope the USA has is >>>> a foreign president. >> >>> It gets much worse than that. A foreign-born radical leftist president >>> whose >>> guiding light is black liberation theology and who continually lies, >>> vacillates and breaks promises is what we've got. >> >> What a truly dreadful state of affairs! Would it not be possible for >> you guys in the US to avoid this sort of monstrous imposition by >> having some kind of democracy in which you vote for the President? > That is exactly what we do, Chris. It doesn't solve the problem. So the US public is now not only socialist but sympathetic to black liberation theology and foreigners! If things have gone as far as that what possible hope of recovery to right thinking values can there be? Why don't you emigrate to somewhere a right thinking white Christian can take a pride in? -- Chris Malcolm
From: Chris H on 15 Dec 2009 04:42 In message <3aidnQdGIoDFgrrWnZ2dnUVZ_rudnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, Neil Harrington <never(a)home.com> writes > >"tony cooper" <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message >news:p51ei5dats21570jh7pm07ftn4p9l3di10(a)4ax.com... >> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:39:58 -0500, "Neil Harrington" <never(a)home.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>I doubt many Brits consider themselves at war with Ireland. If such a war >>>did exist Ireland would be quickly demolished, since it could not possibly >>>survive that war. You have a *very* peculiar world view, I'll say that for >>>you. >> >> No Brits consider themselves at war with Ireland, and haven't for >> decades. > >Perhaps you mean "no Brits except Christ H." He thinks there's a >British-Irish war and it's still going on. There was never in the last 100 years a British-Irish war. There was "the troubles" where some criminals committed murders etc. It was not a war. It may be just my warped view but I was in the British military at the time, >> was in the part of the United >> Kingdom known as Northern Ireland. It is not part of the Republic of >> Ireland. >> >> The full and proper name of the UK is The United Kingdom of Great >> Britain and Northern Ireland. > >I think everyone already knows all that, Tony. Instead of explaining the >obvious and well-known to me, you might want to try convincing Chris H. that >Britain is not currently at war with Ireland. Lots of luck to you. I know that. Where did you get that very silly idea that we were at war with Ireland. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
From: tony cooper on 15 Dec 2009 09:05 On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:42:22 +0000, Chris H <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote: >>> >>> No Brits consider themselves at war with Ireland, and haven't for >>> decades. >> >>Perhaps you mean "no Brits except Christ H." He thinks there's a >>British-Irish war and it's still going on. > >There was never in the last 100 years a British-Irish war. There was >"the troubles" where some criminals committed murders etc. And some of them were British paras. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
From: tony cooper on 15 Dec 2009 13:18 On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:49:07 -0500, "Neil Harrington" <never(a)home.com> wrote: > >"tony cooper" <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message >news:db3fi55lltiiv6v4vpjp436fat4khpj722(a)4ax.com... > > >> >> The "birthers" are a very small minority that the rest of us take as a >> joke. Their claims get press attention just as a three-headed calf >> gets attention in the newspaper. What they don't get is serious >> attention. > >When Lou Dobbs of CNN repeatedly raised the question of Obama's birthplace, >repeatedly asked why Obama refused to show his actual birth certificate, I >would say that qualifies as "serious attention." You may take Lou Dobb's views on this seriously, but I don't. Dobbs is toying around for a run at either the Presidency or a Senate seat. He's selling his syndicated radio show. He's looking for attention and trying to gain name recognition. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
From: Ray Fischer on 15 Dec 2009 14:09
Neil Harrington <never(a)home.com> wrote: >"tony cooper" <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message >> >> The "birthers" are a very small minority that the rest of us take as a >> joke. Their claims get press attention just as a three-headed calf >> gets attention in the newspaper. What they don't get is serious >> attention. > >When Lou Dobbs of CNN repeatedly raised the question of Obama's birthplace, >repeatedly asked why Obama refused to show his actual birth certificate, Even though it had been provided. > I >would say that qualifies as "serious attention." You'd be correct in saying >it never got the full attention of all the news media that it deserves, Oooo! You're another birther fruitcake! > but >when 90% of reporters consistently vote Democrat And paranoid too! >and have shown a remarkable >reluctance to deliver any news that might be embarrassing to Democrats -- Wingnut propaganda is never credible. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net |