BIOLOGY IN A NUT SHELL
in [Physics]
|
Prev: POTUS OBAMA & BP HEAD IMPERVIOUS TO WHAT 'S IN STORE WITH THE NEXT HURRICANES IN THE GULF OF MEXICO ... are those people crazy not to choke that well right now for good ?
Next: Covariant and contravariant quantities
From: Darwin123 on 15 Jun 2010 21:51 On Jun 15, 2:17 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > "Darwin123" <drosen0...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:b77d37f6-87ec-4308-a441-fdafa5a5b696(a)k39g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 6, 11:26 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote:> BIOLOGY IN A NUT SHELL > > This belongs in TALK.ORIGINS, or TALK.CREATION. For some reason, > you chose not have those groups on your list. This topic is entirely > off-topic for SCI.PHYSICS or SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY. > Do you see any rational connection between developmental biology > and relativity? Or between fundamental religion and relativity? > Furthermore, Google groups does not support posting to > SCI.BIOLOGY. > ============================================= > George Hammond has been hospitalized, he is genuinely psychotic. I didn't know that. > That's not name-calling or merely insulting, he really is deranged. > Calling you deranged is fine, you can fight back, but I leave Hammond > alone and advise you to as well. One should not mock the afflicted, he > is not fair game. I wasn't mocking him. I was taking him seriously. I was suggesting that he post somewhere else because he was off topic. He is as coherent or more than the other Creationists on talk.origins. I still think that Hammond would blend in very well there. I will refrain from responding to Hammond in the future.
From: Androcles on 16 Jun 2010 01:49
"Darwin123" <drosen0000(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:684c88fa-3ad7-4152-9ec5-01e39f2b8c6f(a)y4g2000yqy.googlegroups.com... On Jun 15, 2:17 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > "Darwin123" <drosen0...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:b77d37f6-87ec-4308-a441-fdafa5a5b696(a)k39g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 6, 11:26 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote:> BIOLOGY > IN A NUT SHELL > > This belongs in TALK.ORIGINS, or TALK.CREATION. For some reason, > you chose not have those groups on your list. This topic is entirely > off-topic for SCI.PHYSICS or SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY. > Do you see any rational connection between developmental biology > and relativity? Or between fundamental religion and relativity? > Furthermore, Google groups does not support posting to > SCI.BIOLOGY. > ============================================= > George Hammond has been hospitalized, he is genuinely psychotic. I didn't know that. > That's not name-calling or merely insulting, he really is deranged. > Calling you deranged is fine, you can fight back, but I leave Hammond > alone and advise you to as well. One should not mock the afflicted, he > is not fair game. I wasn't mocking him. I was taking him seriously. I was suggesting that he post somewhere else because he was off topic. He is as coherent or more than the other Creationists on talk.origins. I still think that Hammond would blend in very well there. I will refrain from responding to Hammond in the future. ======== Thank you. |