From: krw on
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:59:34 -0700, DrParnassus
<DrParnassus(a)hereforlongtime.org> wrote:

>On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:25:02 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <greegor47(a)gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Archie > Will one of you other total retards
>>Archie > explain to this greegor newbie
>>Archie > dumbfuck that editing the header
>>Archie > line is stooopid. He has to be the
>>Archie > most Usenet clueless dope I have
>>Archie > seen in years.
>>
>>Because you ask so NICELY?
>>
>>Even before you insulted basically everybody,
>>who in sci.electronics.design do you think
>>hasn't figured out you are a delusional liar?
>>
>>It's you against the world, sociopath boy.
>
>
> When you edit a reply's title line, and remove the "re:" You start a
>new thread, idiot.

Only because *you* don't know how to use a newsreader, DimBulb.

> You are a Usenet newbie, or one of those total retards that never
>cared. Then, there is that stalking behavior. Either way, you are the
>one that deserves to be filtered.

Why don't you filter *everyone* Dimmie? In fact, just leave now and go play
in mommy's hamper.
From: JosephKK on
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:04:32 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

<snip>

>He invokes technical issues, if only by being so perfectly wrong. He
>is sort of the rock we picnic on.
>
>I suspect he's a retired tech who never liked math or engineers. I'd
>feel sorry got him if he wasn't so foul and obnoxious. And
>AlwaysWrong.
>
>John

Not that it is a fair comparison, but would a tech that ignorant last 30
days at your company? Let alone long enough to retire?
Maybe a retired Government electrician.
From: JosephKK on
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:57:59 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <greegor47(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>Does anybody in sci.electronics.design NOT
>realize that Archie is a complete bullshitter,
>a mental case trying to sell his egotistical delusions?
>

The people who have figured that out no longer see nor respond to his
blatherings.
From: YD on
Late at night, by candle light, DrParnassus
<DrParnassus(a)hereforlongtime.org> penned this immortal opus:

>On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:25:02 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <greegor47(a)gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Archie > Will one of you other total retards
>>Archie > explain to this greegor newbie
>>Archie > dumbfuck that editing the header
>>Archie > line is stooopid. He has to be the
>>Archie > most Usenet clueless dope I have
>>Archie > seen in years.
>>
>>Because you ask so NICELY?
>>
>>Even before you insulted basically everybody,
>>who in sci.electronics.design do you think
>>hasn't figured out you are a delusional liar?
>>
>>It's you against the world, sociopath boy.
>
>
> When you edit a reply's title line, and remove the "re:" You start a
>new thread, idiot.
>

Not if the threading is by reference. Threaded just right for me. Do
try to set up whatever you use for newsreader.

- YD.
--
Remove HAT if replying by mail.
From: m II on
JosephKK wrote:

> Not that it is a fair comparison, but would a tech that ignorant last 30
> days at your company? Let alone long enough to retire?
> Maybe a retired Government electrician.


The Ancient and Honourable Guild of Electricians and Etherealists
takes great offense at your statement, which methinks implies our
members are possessed of a great Stupidity, bordering on the Parnassian.

Members of this rather August and Eclectic Association, especially
those having been called to serve in the Public Works, have never come
so close as to even FLIRT with Stupidity.

However, having said that, in moments of what may be Ale induced
honesty, a few HAVE admitted to occasionally, occasionally, mind you,
performing their tasks in a slightly over-casual fashion.

Bless their honesty, I say and forgive their very human foibles.

As an ending to this missive, I appeal to you not to Tar our fine
institution with the ever pervasive Parnassian Brush of Cretinhoodery.
Are we not all Coulombians, after all?


With thanks,


mike