From: Greegor on
Archie > Will one of you other total retards
Archie > explain to this greegor newbie
Archie > dumbfuck that editing the header
Archie > line is stooopid. He has to be the
Archie > most Usenet clueless dope I have
Archie > seen in years.

Because you ask so NICELY?

Even before you insulted basically everybody,
who in sci.electronics.design do you think
hasn't figured out you are a delusional liar?

It's you against the world, sociopath boy.
From: DrParnassus on
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:25:02 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <greegor47(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>Archie > Will one of you other total retards
>Archie > explain to this greegor newbie
>Archie > dumbfuck that editing the header
>Archie > line is stooopid. He has to be the
>Archie > most Usenet clueless dope I have
>Archie > seen in years.
>
>Because you ask so NICELY?
>
>Even before you insulted basically everybody,
>who in sci.electronics.design do you think
>hasn't figured out you are a delusional liar?
>
>It's you against the world, sociopath boy.


When you edit a reply's title line, and remove the "re:" You start a
new thread, idiot.

You are a Usenet newbie, or one of those total retards that never
cared. Then, there is that stalking behavior. Either way, you are the
one that deserves to be filtered.
From: JW on
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:23:42 -0700 DrParnassus
<DrParnassus(a)hereforlongtime.org> wrote in Message id:
<a7d4265leatl78si871qatvuvu8ik5r622(a)4ax.com>:

>On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:34:00 -0400, JW <none(a)dev.null> wrote:
>
>>27 cents each
>
>
> You pay that much for a resistor, and do not consider it other than std?
>You're an idiot.

*sigh*

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=RMCF1/1610MFRCT-ND

Better, AlwaysWrong? If 4 cents maxes out your credit limit, you could
always take out a second mortgage on your cardboard box.
From: JosephKK on
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:30:07 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:37:52 -0700, DrParnassus
><DrParnassus(a)hereforlongtime.org> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 07:05:09 -0700, John Larkin
>><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Extech makes nice stuff. I think FLIR bought them to keep them from
>>>introducing a competitive IR imager.
>>>
>>>John
>>
>> Total bullshit.
>>
>> Extexh did not nor does not have the expertise to make an IR imager.
>>
>> I worked for an IR instrument maker, and FLIR buys calibration
>>equipment from them, and never felt threatened by our IR imager, which
>>has been around since before extech even existed.
>>
>> Raytheon or Square-D is a bigger threat in that market, and I am sure
>>that FLIR has no worries about them either. FLIR has a main market niche
>>that nobody encroaches on.
>>
>> Extech was NEVER a player in IR and especially not ANY military IR, and
>>any gear they did carry, they bought elsewhere and put their name on it.
>>
>> You're a goddamned idiot, as usual.
>
>http://www.extechstore.com/extech-irc40.aspx
>
>One day in the not-so-far future you'll be able to buy thermal imagers
>at Home Depot for under $250, eventually under $100.
>
>John

Seems FLIR bought them to speed up the reasonably priced semi-pro gear.

Oh, and i could hear the snap in El Cahon clear up here in Sacramento,
now i know what it was.
From: John Larkin on
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:58:43 -0700, DrParnassus
<DrParnassus(a)hereforlongtime.org> wrote:

>On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:15:17 -0700, John Larkin
><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:01:06 -0700, DrParnassus
>><DrParnassus(a)hereforlongtime.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:12:47 -0700, John Larkin
>>><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:28:26 -0700, DrParnassus
>>>><DrParnassus(a)hereforlongtime.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:50:37 -0700, John Larkin
>>>>><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Dale says they're expensive because hardly anybody buys them.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If they have to do a lot run simply because one order triggered it,
>>>>>they lose money if it isn't a pretty big order, and SMD has expiration
>>>>>dates due to termination oxidation issues so they cannot simply store the
>>>>>over-production stock either. Though I will take old parts because they
>>>>>are usable for proto builds.
>>>>
>>>>As I said, they are axial RC07 types, not SMD.
>>>>
>>>>They do stock 22M, available from distributors at a more sensible
>>>>price, and 33M, also distributor stock maybe. The 50M ones are
>>>>apparently not much in demand.
>>>>
>>>>All *are* 1% parts. And we can measure them accurately.
>>>>
>>>>I need a small constant current, and it's a battle between Johnson
>>>>noise current and shot/excess noise. It's not easy to generate a nA
>>>>level quiet constant current. The alternative was ten 10M
>>>>surface-mount thinfilms in series, which we don't have room for.
>>>>
>>>>John
>>>>
>>> You left out one over f.
>>
>>Do you even know what 1/f noise is?
>>
>>John
>
> No, john. I characterized JV circuits for years. We never came across
>it.
>
> Come back when you are not being an absolute insult to the entire
>industry, John.

I'll take that answer for a "no."

John