From: James Egan on 25 May 2010 04:30 On Mon, 24 May 2010 13:34:36 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhondaleakirk(a)earthling.net> wrote: >Dustin has apparently reformed everything about himself but his predilection >for mouthing off. Nonetheless, if you really feel compelled to harass him, >please direct all complaints to his email, instead of harassing the rest of >us. I can't agree with that. raidy can end all the rubbish by moving on and not replying to nymshits but he won't because he likes the attention and reminiscing about former glories. Jim.
From: FromTheRafters on 25 May 2010 05:56 "James Egan" <jegan(a)jegan.com> wrote in message news:861fc5F1b0U1(a)mid.individual.net... > > On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:24:10 GMT, Dustin Cook > <bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>I hope your not in any possible way religious by any means. If so, I'd >>have >>to call you a hypocrite.. I have tried my best to make up for the >>things I >>did, but individuals like you and the anonymous remailer just can't >>seem to >>let go of the past or accept the fact that people aren't always what >>they >>were 10+ years ago. > > You might not be writing freely available viruses anymore but you're > arguing with the remailer now just as you argued with fourqueue before > that and Rhonda before that and others before that so not everything > has changed. The "look how clever I am" attention seeking raidy is > still alive and kicking behind the moral facade and you love it. 10+ years? Seems he missed an opportunity to distance himself further but saying 'last century' or even 'last millennium'.
From: Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries on 25 May 2010 09:48 James Egan wrote: > On Mon, 24 May 2010 13:34:36 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" > <rhondaleakirk(a)earthling.net> wrote: > >> Dustin has apparently reformed everything about himself but his >> predilection for mouthing off. Nonetheless, if you really feel >> compelled to harass him, please direct all complaints to his >> email, instead of harassing the rest of us. > > I can't agree with that. raidy can end all the rubbish by moving > on and not replying to nymshits but he won't because he likes the > attention and reminiscing about former glories. It's actually just plain old human nature to respond to personal attacks such as these. Eventually some people develop the discipline to ignore being pounded on, but it's a rare scenario. This kind of flaming and the responses thereto are what has kept usenet alive for many years past its expiration date. I agree with you, however, that ignoring it would be better. -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously. Hubert H. Humphrey
From: George Orwell on 25 May 2010 17:52 "ASCII" <me2(a)privacy.net> smartmouthed as usual: > FromTheRafters wrote: >> >>10+ years? Seems he missed an opportunity to distance himself further >>but saying 'last century' or even 'last millennium'. > > That would only dilute the fantasy he so desperately strives to keep alive, > of being someone of importance and relevance. ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!!! That's rich coming from one of the most conceited self-important trash-talking posers on Usenet! What have YOU ever done that was of any consequence? ASCII, Good God y'all, huh! What is he good for? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system Per maggiori informazioni |For more info https://www.mixmaster.it
From: David Kaye on 26 May 2010 19:38
Dustin Cook <bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com> wrote: >I wasn't raised to sit idly by while someone talks down to me. I was raised that way, too, but I learned as an adult that a lot of fights are just not worth getting involved in. Thus I can talk about things here on Usenet that would normally elicit flame wars, except that I ignore people who are trying to flame me, and they quickly go away. |