From: Chris on 5 Mar 2010 14:11 I have posted several threads about converting 24Hz pulses to 60Hz basically a 5/2 ratio. I tried a phase locked loop, it sorta works, but my chip count is getting high, and I am thinking about making more of these and selling them if I can write a computer program to resolve wave sound files. Therefore, since I am not very familiar with micro controllers, I was not planning on using one. However, I remember an engineer friend of mine mentioning the BASIC stamp. I have dabbled in BASIC so, I might approach the problem with this as a solution, especially if I can do it with one or two chips. I would think that I could sample the 24Hz side for one second. Take that number and use it to divide a much higher frequency quartz reference by some large value of N so that I can get it back down to 60Hz. Therefore my lock time would be one second. I can have an easy lock indication and a fairly fast response to any changes in frequency. What do you guys/gals think? Regards, Chris Maness
From: Jan Panteltje on 5 Mar 2010 14:59 On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:11:38 -0800 (PST)) it happened Chris <christopher.maness(a)gmail.com> wrote in <29529065-09fc-4636-9a29-c618cbc16f42(a)x1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>: >I have posted several threads about converting 24Hz pulses to 60Hz >basically a 5/2 ratio. I tried a phase locked loop, it sorta works, >but my chip count is getting high, and I am thinking about making more >of these and selling them if I can write a computer program to resolve >wave sound files. > >Therefore, since I am not very familiar with micro controllers, I was >not planning on using one. However, I remember an engineer friend of >mine mentioning the BASIC stamp. I have dabbled in BASIC so, I might >approach the problem with this as a solution, especially if I can do >it with one or two chips. > >I would think that I could sample the 24Hz side for one second. Take >that number and use it to divide a much higher frequency quartz >reference by some large value of N so that I can get it back down to >60Hz. Therefore my lock time would be one second. I can have an easy >lock indication and a fairly fast response to any changes in >frequency. > >What do you guys/gals think? > >Regards, >Chris Maness Years ago I posted a PIC 50 Hz PLL asm code here. Or maybe it was 25 Hz. I would not bother with BASIC, likely way too slow, and way too much resources hungry. A 1$50 12 pin PIC should do...
From: Chris on 5 Mar 2010 15:32 On Mar 5, 11:59 am, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:11:38 -0800 (PST)) it happened Chris > <christopher.man...(a)gmail.com> wrote in > <29529065-09fc-4636-9a29-c618cbc16...(a)x1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>: > > > > >I have posted several threads about converting 24Hz pulses to 60Hz > >basically a 5/2 ratio. I tried a phase locked loop, it sorta works, > >but my chip count is getting high, and I am thinking about making more > >of these and selling them if I can write a computer program to resolve > >wave sound files. > > >Therefore, since I am not very familiar with micro controllers, I was > >not planning on using one. However, I remember an engineer friend of > >mine mentioning the BASIC stamp. I have dabbled in BASIC so, I might > >approach the problem with this as a solution, especially if I can do > >it with one or two chips. > > >I would think that I could sample the 24Hz side for one second. Take > >that number and use it to divide a much higher frequency quartz > >reference by some large value of N so that I can get it back down to > >60Hz. Therefore my lock time would be one second. I can have an easy > >lock indication and a fairly fast response to any changes in > >frequency. > > >What do you guys/gals think? > > >Regards, > >Chris Maness > > Years ago I posted a PIC 50 Hz PLL asm code here. > Or maybe it was 25 Hz. > I would not bother with BASIC, likely way too slow, and way too much resources hungry. > A 1$50 12 pin PIC should do... What are some models that would be good for that application. I see some 8 pin models that are only $2. The only problem is that I have NO clue how to start programming them. Regards, Chris
From: Jan Panteltje on 5 Mar 2010 15:50 On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:32:47 -0800 (PST)) it happened Chris <christopher.maness(a)gmail.com> wrote in <248a815a-80f1-425c-8bbe-fe9a2829ba14(a)g8g2000pri.googlegroups.com>: >On Mar 5, 11:59�am, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:11:38 -0800 (PST)) it happened Chris >> <christopher.man...(a)gmail.com> wrote in >> <29529065-09fc-4636-9a29-c618cbc16...(a)x1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>: >> >> >> >> >I have posted several threads about converting 24Hz pulses to 60Hz >> >basically a 5/2 ratio. �I tried a phase locked loop, it sorta works, >> >but my chip count is getting high, and I am thinking about making more >> >of these and selling them if I can write a computer program to resolve >> >wave sound files. >> >> >Therefore, since I am not very familiar with micro controllers, I was >> >not planning on using one. �However, I remember an engineer friend of >> >mine mentioning the BASIC stamp. �I have dabbled in BASIC so, I might >> >approach the problem with this as a solution, especially if I can do >> >it with one or two chips. >> >> >I would think that I could sample the 24Hz side for one second. �Take >> >that number and use it to divide a �much higher frequency quartz >> >reference by some large value of N so that I can get it back down to >> >60Hz. �Therefore my lock time would be one second. �I can have an ea= >sy >> >lock indication and a fairly fast response to any changes in >> >frequency. >> >> >What do you guys/gals think? >> >> >Regards, >> >Chris Maness >> >> Years ago I posted a PIC 50 Hz PLL asm code here. >> Or maybe it was 25 Hz. >> I would not bother with BASIC, likely way too slow, and way too much reso= >urces hungry. >> A 1$50 12 pin PIC should do... > >What are some models that would be good for that application. I see >some 8 pin models that are only $2. The only problem is that I have >NO clue how to start programming them. > >Regards, >Chris I dunno, how many I/O pins, what clock speed, do you need any thing else like an ADC or comparators, EEPROM? I used a 12F629. You need a programmer, can be made yourself for a few $, or buy one for a lot of dollars, like 50$ even. Then you need MPLAB from Microchip, the PC software development environment. I do no tuse that either, I wrote my own programmer software and use Linux and gpasm. You DO need an oscilloscope in my opinion, else no clue what PIC does.
From: linnix on 5 Mar 2010 15:55 On Mar 5, 11:11 am, Chris <christopher.man...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I have posted several threads about converting 24Hz pulses to 60Hz > basically a 5/2 ratio. I tried a phase locked loop, it sorta works, > but my chip count is getting high, and I am thinking about making more > of these and selling them if I can write a computer program to resolve > wave sound files. > > Therefore, since I am not very familiar with micro controllers, I was > not planning on using one. However, I remember an engineer friend of > mine mentioning the BASIC stamp. I have dabbled in BASIC so, I might > approach the problem with this as a solution, especially if I can do > it with one or two chips. > > I would think that I could sample the 24Hz side for one second. Take > that number and use it to divide a much higher frequency quartz > reference by some large value of N so that I can get it back down to > 60Hz. Therefore my lock time would be one second. I can have an easy > lock indication and a fairly fast response to any changes in > frequency. If your signal is 24Hz, where is the changes in frequency coming from? We need to know more about the spec first. > > What do you guys/gals think? > > Regards, > Chris Maness
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Prev: Capacitor Wizard (ESR Tester) Meter Movement Next: Cruise ship stuck in ice |