From: Baron on
Richard Dobson Inscribed thus:

> Please stop this drivel now. The LHC at full power is somewhat less
> dangerous than lighting a match in an igloo the size of St Mark's
> Venice. Are there any qualified scientists on these sci.whatever lists
> AT ALL?
>
> Or at least please stop sending to comp.dsp!
>
> Richard Dobson
>
> On 22/02/2010 07:26, Magnetic wrote:
>> Scandal at CERN.
>> New article in German:
>> http://www.firmenpresse.de/pressinfo164449.html
>>
>> Take action. Save yourself. Ban experiments at energies more than 0.1
>> TeV per particle at head-on colliders.

Just Killfile the id10t.

--
Best Regards:
Baron.
From: Sjouke Burry on
Magnetic wrote:
> On Feb 22, 11:13 pm, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com>
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:26:28 -0800 (PST), Magnetic
>>
>>
>>
Now,now, where are your apologies for your failed
doom shouting?
Or are you following the crooks way of changing the story,
hoping nobody notices?
From: John Fields on
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:20:38 +0100, Sjouke Burry
<burrynulnulfour(a)ppllaanneett.nnll> wrote:

>Magnetic wrote:
>> On Feb 22, 11:13 pm, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:26:28 -0800 (PST), Magnetic
>>>
>>>
>>>
>Now,now, where are your apologies for your failed
>doom shouting?
>Or are you following the crooks way of changing the story,
>hoping nobody notices?

---
"Crook" is exactly right.

He's now moving the goalposts by stating that, statistically, he can't
be wrong unless nothing bad happens, ever, and it's up to everyone to
wait, forever, for the proof.

JF
From: Magnetic on
The Earth will be blown up in one of the next days, by the scum who
call themselves as scientists. Society, you are a stupid cattle -
because, despite the existence of this and similar web-sites, you did
nothing for the detention of terrorists, physicists from CERN and
other scoundrels, sitting in academies and promoting this blasphemous
experiment. Cattle, I do not feel sorry for you. I do not believe any
more that this experiment can be banned. Burn, all of you in this
bright last flame.

I reread the LSAG report once more and found there another error. The
binding energy of constituent element of strangelet is not several
MeV, as they wrote there, but about 500 MeV. So, all their talks about
thermal bath are erroneous. Strange matter is very dangerous!

The value 500 TeV, as a binding energy of (uds) in a strangelet
N(uds), can easily be received from comparison with the rest energy of
kaons K+ and K0, which are correspondingly 493 MeV and 497 MeV.
Kaons (K+=us; K0=ds) can be side products, occurring at the time of
proton (p=uud) and neutron (n=udd) capture by strange matter N(uds):
N(uds) + p = (N+1)(uds) + K+ = (N+1)(uds) + e+ + 500 MeV.
(N+1)(uds) + n = (N+2)(uds) + K0 = (N+2)(uds) + 500 MeV.
....
....
....
Extremely powerful explosion.

This explosion has specific energy output, which is hundred times
bigger than under the nuclear explosion.

By the way, at the time of November-December collisions there were
more Kaons output that it was theoretically predicted. That means that
we are very close to creation of this dead droplet, which can
transform the whole Earth into 10-meterr lump of strange\dead matter.
Space observations says us that periods of pulsars are almost do not
change. That means that strange matter is very stable.

Read about strange matter, strangelets, and strange stars in
Wikipedia. I think that our civilization is crazy. From one hand, it
already knows about a deadly dangerous strange matter; from the other
hand, it tries to create that dead droplet at colliders. I do not
understand you, people.

I wish you to become mentally healthy and STOP all powerful colliders.

Somebody wrote: Also the mass of a proton is 938.272 MeV/c^2 and the
mass of a uds is 1,115.683 MeV/c^2.

Mass of a free proton is 938.272 MeV/c^2.
Mass of a proton in deuteron is several MeV/c^2 less.
Mass of a proton in He is several MeV/c^2 less.
Mass of a proton in C is several MeV/c^2 less.
Mass of a proton in Fe is several MeV/c^2 less, and minimal.

These mass differences say us about binding energy.

Strange droplet consisting of a several (uds) is unstable and decay.

AFAIK some authors said that droplet could be stable if it has at
least 10 elements.
The more number of “strange nucleons” inside the droplet, the more
binding energy.
I think that its binding energy properties are analogues to those of a
magnetic hole. So I think that specific binding energy has a limit and
it lays somewhere near 500 MeV (or about of 1/2 of protons rest
energy).

Note. My computation for magnetic hole gives: energy of ruined protons
splits per two parts: 2/3 goes into creation of magnetic field; 1/3
goes into binding energy or simply emitted with radiation.

Strange matter has fermionic structure.
Magnetic hole has bosonic structure.

CERN physicist can create dead droplet, having fermionic, bosonic or
scirmionic structure. Any such condensate is dangerous, because it can
transform the whole Earth into dead extremely dense matter.

Now they collide protons with energies of about 0.45 TeV per proton.
In any of the next days the energy can be risen to 3.5 TeV. That can
create a microscopic droplet of death, and in a 1000 seconds our Earth
will be exploded.

PS: In the Galaxy at the time of about 100 000 000 000 years almost
all stars dies and the same number of stars are born. Now is the time
for our Sun. Who will push the button?