From: John Larkin on
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:01:17 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
<BretCahill(a)peoplepc.com> wrote:

>> > > > > This looks like a real working solution to the cheap, clean energy
>> > > > > conundra challenge

It's almost certainly not real, and not working.

This sort of nonsense gets announced every day or so.

John



From: John Stafford on
In article <7va6o5l3bedaop27gdmeaedusvgd5jok6m(a)4ax.com>,
John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

> This sort of nonsense gets announced every day or so.

That is true. What worries me is that we have no idea what the Bloombox
means in terms of emissions. It's not like it just eats up oxygen and
drips out...
From: George Herold on
On Feb 22, 8:15 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:01:17 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
>
> <BretCah...(a)peoplepc.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > This looks like a real working solution to the cheap, clean energy
> >> > > > > conundra challenge
>
> It's almost certainly not real, and not working.
>
> This sort of nonsense gets announced every day or so.
>
> John

> This sort of nonsense gets announced every day or so.
Yeah, mostly from Bret Cahill, If we stop responding will he go
away?

George H.
From: John Stafford on

Glaring shortcoming of the video - "Carbon Footprint" :)

For all we know it is sucking up oxygen and spewing out CO2 like friggin
crazy.

Nothing is for nothing.
From: pamela on
George Herold wrote:
> On Feb 22, 8:15 pm, John Larkin
> <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:01:17 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
>>
>> <BretCah...(a)peoplepc.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> This looks like a real working solution to the cheap, clean energy
>>>>>>>> conundra challenge
>> It's almost certainly not real, and not working.
>>
>> This sort of nonsense gets announced every day or so.
>>
>> John
>
>> This sort of nonsense gets announced every day or so.
> Yeah, mostly from Bret Cahill, If we stop responding will he go
> away?
>
> George H.

You keep proving that you can't stop yourselves from responding.
Somehow, for some reason, somebody will evidently almost always be
inprired to respo0nd, and then somebody else, and then you are
speculating on BloomBoxes or whatever else there is --- because it is at
least conversation.

Evidently, without someone like Brett, conversation is quite limited.

Just look at the long periods of no conversations, punctuated by loads
of conversations when Cahill stirs up the dust.

Without leadership, no matter what quality, there isn't much technical
conversation.

At least, that is what I SEE just from the postings.