From: AES on
This is a user report which is totally summed up in the Subject: line.
If it helps anyone reading it, it helps them.

Expanded version: For a long time I've been using TextEdit as my
primary document reading, composing, and editing tool, and griping about
how it's almost good enough and if Apple would only add a few features
it would be really great.

People kept responding: switch to Bean. I finally made the switch. It's
definitely worth the small learning curve; I should have done it long
ago.

[For the record, this is on 10.4.11; I'll make the switch to Leopard/
Snow Leopard eventually also.]
From: Scotto on
On 2010-03-21 11:15:28 -0500, AES said:

> This is a user report which is totally summed up in the Subject: line.
> If it helps anyone reading it, it helps them.

Thanks, I'll try it. Nice GUI.
--
Scotto

From: Davoud on
AES wrote:

> This is a user report which is totally summed up in the Subject: line.

You left out the "IMO." Without such a disclaimer one is sermonizing.

> If it helps anyone reading it, it helps them.
>
> Expanded version: For a long time I've been using TextEdit as my
> primary document reading, composing, and editing tool, and griping about
> how it's almost good enough and if Apple would only add a few features
> it would be really great.

I'd have probably said "Switch to Pages of MS Word."

> People kept responding: switch to Bean. I finally made the switch. It's
> definitely worth the small learning curve; I should have done it long
> ago.
>
> [For the record, this is on 10.4.11;

Then you don't know about the current version of TextEdit, do you?

> I'll make the switch to Leopard/
> Snow Leopard eventually also.]

After the bugs are worked out? The rest of us will probably be on OS XV
by the time you "catch up" :)

--
I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that
you will say in your entire life.

usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm
From: Erik Richard Sørensen on

AES wrote:
> This is a user report which is totally summed up in the Subject: line.
> If it helps anyone reading it, it helps them.
>
> Expanded version: For a long time I've been using TextEdit as my
> primary document reading, composing, and editing tool, and griping about
> how it's almost good enough and if Apple would only add a few features
> it would be really great.
>
> People kept responding: switch to Bean. I finally made the switch. It's
> definitely worth the small learning curve; I should have done it long
> ago.
>
> [For the record, this is on 10.4.11; I'll make the switch to Leopard/
> Snow Leopard eventually also.]

Bean /is/ fast and rock solid on 10.4.x, but some of the features are
not available when using Tiger. Swith to it also on 10.5.x and 10.6.x
and you'll gain the full features and even more speed and flexibility! -
Alone the RegEx search engine is worth the money. It is the fastest ever
search engine I've been using. I donot know what James does with it,
since the engine should be the same as in TextEdit, but real life gives
quite a lot faster and better results with Bean. [I know Bean is free.:-)].

I use Bean as my textprocessor number 2 - right after the absolute
primary number 1 = NisusWriter Pro.:-) - The speed, stability and
compatibility was the main reason for me to choose it as my secondary
text app, and the next was that it also is fully Text-To-Speech
compatible. This was also the reason for me to make the Danish
translation at first, so that any visually impaired Mac user also could
get a good and reliable textprocessor - even if they need to use the
speech system in OS X.

Cheers, Erik Richard

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Erik Richard Sørensen, Member of ADC, <mac-manNOSP(a)Mstofanet.dk>
NisusWriter - The Future In Multilingual Text Processing - www.nisus.com
OpenOffice.org - The Modern Productivity Solution - www.openoffice.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: Erik Richard Sørensen on

Davoud wrote:
> AES wrote:
>> This is a user report which is totally summed up in the Subject: line.
>
> You left out the "IMO." Without such a disclaimer one is sermonizing.

And what about an overall rating of 4,8 out of 5,0? - I think this tells
a lot!

>> If it helps anyone reading it, it helps them.
>>
>> Expanded version: For a long time I've been using TextEdit as my
>> primary document reading, composing, and editing tool, and griping about
>> how it's almost good enough and if Apple would only add a few features
>> it would be really great.
>
> I'd have probably said "Switch to Pages of MS Word."

Pages? - This is about the worst ever piece of crap0 Apple ever has
released as a socalled 'text processor'.:-(! - I've been forced to use
it (Pages 09) for a while to translate a large userguide containing both
text, tables, graphics and sheets, auto indexing etc. and with lots of
internal links and cross references..., and this is some of the worst
experiences I've ever had with a text processor, - slow, unstable, poor
compatibility, very poor spell checking, unreliable hypehing and much,
much more. And if you happened to move a link to either the previous or
next page and hit the 'Save' the link is just gone somewhere in space. -
Here is infact a point where TextEdit is far much better than Pages, -
you can move around with text add/remove or whatever, but once a link is
set, it is kept.....!

>> People kept responding: switch to Bean. I finally made the switch. It's
>> definitely worth the small learning curve; I should have done it long
>> ago.
>>
>> [For the record, this is on 10.4.11;
>
> Then you don't know about the current version of TextEdit, do you?

I do! - And Bean is heads in front of that app as well!

Cheers, Erik Richard

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Erik Richard Sørensen, Member of ADC, <mac-manNOSP(a)Mstofanet.dk>
NisusWriter - The Future In Multilingual Text Processing - www.nisus.com
OpenOffice.org - The Modern Productivity Solution - www.openoffice.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Fun but useless enhancements
Next: HTML code