Prev: Bean is much better than TextEdit -- it's worth switching
Next: 625108 Up to date Net and Tech news, knowledge, empowerment 08
From: Warren Oates on 21 Mar 2010 14:53 In article <sdfisher-2A4DBD.11215321032010(a)mara100-84.onlink.net>, Steven Fisher <sdfisher(a)spamcop.net> wrote: > At the HTML level it's tag-soup, honestly. There's just too much HTML > for what you're trying to do. > > > I did not save this file as HTML in Word, so hopefully the code will be > > much better. > > Really? It still says it was generated by Microsoft Word. It's obviously some MS nonsense. There's a mixture of ascii quote marks and the curly ones and it's a pretty ugly way of rendering a fairly simple text presentation that could _look_ at least interesting. "Tag-soup" is a good one. C'mon John, type out your text as plain text, then mark it up. Word has a pretty good "plain text" style you can work with, you know. -- Very old woody beets will never cook tender. -- Fannie Farmer
From: Steven Fisher on 21 Mar 2010 15:19 In article <jwolf6589-E37337.15105821032010(a)nntp.charter.net>, John <jwolf6589(a)NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: > It was a copy and a paste from Word to Sea Monkey. You mean you copied the source? Because: <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 11"> <meta name="Originator" content="Microsoft Word 11"> Steve
From: Jeffrey Goldberg on 22 Mar 2010 01:39 On 2010-03-21 8:29 PM, John wrote: > I copied the contents of the Word file to Sea Monkey. I did not copy any > source. Yet in the end result are things that could only have been put into the source by MS-Word. I suspect that your copy did include the source, but not in a way that was immediately visible to you. -j -- Jeffrey Goldberg http://goldmark.org/jeff/ I rarely read HTML or poorly quoting posts Reply-To address is valid
From: Mike Rosenberg on 22 Mar 2010 15:02 John <jwolf6589(a)NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote: > > Someone has taken your otherwise good Word document and filled it with > > nonsense. You can restore it by opening it, choosing Edit-->Select all, > > and then pressing the delete key. > > I have no idea what you are talking about. He meant that you took a perfectly good blank document and screwed it up by typing in it. -- My latest dance performance <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_9pudbFisE> Mac and geek T-shirts & gifts <http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi> Prius shirts/bumper stickers <http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi>
From: Jeffrey Goldberg on 22 Mar 2010 17:38
On 2010-03-22 1:59 PM, Mike Rosenberg wrote: > Jeffrey Goldberg <nobody(a)goldmark.org> wrote: > >> The odd thing here is that I didn't say anything in this thread that >> would offend even the most jealous God prior to John's comment. > > JR used the F word in his reply, you quoted it, and John responded to > YOU as if you were the one who used it. Thank you. I wasn't even thinking in terms of the the F word. John's response was as if I had blasphemed, not merely used run of the mill profanity. At least I've shown since then that I take my blasphemy seriously when I want to. Cheers, -j -- Jeffrey Goldberg http://goldmark.org/jeff/ I rarely read HTML or poorly quoting posts Reply-To address is valid |