Black hole red shift
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Hi folks. I'm the darling of sci.physics.relativity. Why am I onsci.logic? Because I am adorable.
Next: What was the strength of original gravity?
From: purple on 12 May 2010 16:35 On 5/12/2010 1:34 PM, BruceS wrote: > On May 11, 10:31 pm, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> On May 11, 11:29 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 5/11/2010 11:28 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote: >> >>>> On May 11, 9:18 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>> On May 10, 8:27 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> On 5/10/2010 9:51 AM, Tom Roberts wrote: >> >>>>>>> BURT wrote: >>>>>>>> On May 7, 5:04 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> If red shift goes infinite then light no longer has energy. If it is a >>>>>>>>> blueshift then light will have an infinite energy. These are the >>>>>>>>> nonsense predictions at the event horizon associated with the end of >> >>>>>> [...] >> >>>>>>> [I normally ignore your silly, idiotic statements, because they >>>>>>> are completely divorced from science. Don't expect me to respond, >>>>>>> until and unless you have something sensible to say.] >> >>>>>> You mean there's an escape clause from "never"? >> >>>>> There is no escape speed for light flow because it is a constant of C >>>>> that does not change under gravity. Matter will slow down leaving >>>>> gravity. But not light. Light always overcomes gravity by its fastest >>>>> speed that does not slow down. >> >>>>> There are no black holes. >> >>>>> Mitch Raemsch >> >>>> Shut up. >> >>> Shhhhh! He's so much fun to dribble. >> >> Oh. >> >> You're right. >> >> Mitch, give us more of your ever so slightly wrong wis-dumb. > > With Herc going through another full meltdown, is it better or worse > to focus on BURT in the meantime? > Don, you are not a nice person. That's reason for liking him, no?
From: purple on 12 May 2010 16:37 On 5/12/2010 2:31 PM, BURT wrote: > On May 12, 11:34 am, BruceS<bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> On May 11, 10:31 pm, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On May 11, 11:29 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> >>>> On 5/11/2010 11:28 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote: >> >>>>> On May 11, 9:18 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> On May 10, 8:27 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>> On 5/10/2010 9:51 AM, Tom Roberts wrote: >> >>>>>>>> BURT wrote: >>>>>>>>> On May 7, 5:04 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> If red shift goes infinite then light no longer has energy. If it is a >>>>>>>>>> blueshift then light will have an infinite energy. These are the >>>>>>>>>> nonsense predictions at the event horizon associated with the end of >> >>>>>>> [...] >> >>>>>>>> [I normally ignore your silly, idiotic statements, because they >>>>>>>> are completely divorced from science. Don't expect me to respond, >>>>>>>> until and unless you have something sensible to say.] >> >>>>>>> You mean there's an escape clause from "never"? >> >>>>>> There is no escape speed for light flow because it is a constant of C >>>>>> that does not change under gravity. Matter will slow down leaving >>>>>> gravity. But not light. Light always overcomes gravity by its fastest >>>>>> speed that does not slow down. >> >>>>>> There are no black holes. >> >>>>>> Mitch Raemsch >> >>>>> Shut up. >> >>>> Shhhhh! He's so much fun to dribble. >> >>> Oh. >> >>> You're right. >> >>> Mitch, give us more of your ever so slightly wrong wis-dumb. >> >> With Herc going through another full meltdown, is it better or worse >> to focus on BURT in the meantime? >> Don, you are not a nice person.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Ligfht always overcomes gravity because escape speed only applies to > matter. > > Mitch Raemsch But light matters!
From: BruceS on 12 May 2010 17:27
On May 12, 2:35 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 5/12/2010 1:34 PM, BruceS wrote: > > > > > On May 11, 10:31 pm, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On May 11, 11:29 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > >>> On 5/11/2010 11:28 PM, Don Stockbauer wrote: > > >>>> On May 11, 9:18 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >>>>> On May 10, 8:27 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> On 5/10/2010 9:51 AM, Tom Roberts wrote: > > >>>>>>> BURT wrote: > >>>>>>>> On May 7, 5:04 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> If red shift goes infinite then light no longer has energy. If it is a > >>>>>>>>> blueshift then light will have an infinite energy. These are the > >>>>>>>>> nonsense predictions at the event horizon associated with the end of > > >>>>>> [...] > > >>>>>>> [I normally ignore your silly, idiotic statements, because they > >>>>>>> are completely divorced from science. Don't expect me to respond, > >>>>>>> until and unless you have something sensible to say.] > > >>>>>> You mean there's an escape clause from "never"? > > >>>>> There is no escape speed for light flow because it is a constant of C > >>>>> that does not change under gravity. Matter will slow down leaving > >>>>> gravity. But not light. Light always overcomes gravity by its fastest > >>>>> speed that does not slow down. > > >>>>> There are no black holes. > > >>>>> Mitch Raemsch > > >>>> Shut up. > > >>> Shhhhh! He's so much fun to dribble. > > >> Oh. > > >> You're right. > > >> Mitch, give us more of your ever so slightly wrong wis-dumb. > > > With Herc going through another full meltdown, is it better or worse > > to focus on BURT in the meantime? > > Don, you are not a nice person. > > That's reason for liking him, no? Of course, though not in isolation. Some people are not nice, yet I still don't like them, as they are also not interesting. Don manages to avoid that. |