Prev: Hi folks. I'm the darling of sci.physics.relativity. Why am I onsci.logic? Because I am adorable.
Next: What was the strength of original gravity?
From: BURT on 7 May 2010 20:04 If red shift goes infinite then light no longer has energy. If it is a blueshift then light will have an infinite energy. These are the nonsense predictions at the event horizon associated with the end of time. Gravity violates the energy laws of light. Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 8 May 2010 14:51 On May 7, 5:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > If red shift goes infinite then light no longer has energy. If it is a > blueshift then light will have an infinite energy. These are the > nonsense predictions at the event horizon associated with the end of > time. > > Gravity violates the energy laws of light. > > Mitch Raemsch Pound Rebka reveals gravity influencing light energy. Taking the theory to an extreme reveals zero and infinite energy to light by infinite red and blue shifts at event horizons. This proves that black hole are wrong. Mitch Raemsch
From: Tom Roberts on 10 May 2010 10:51 BURT wrote: > On May 7, 5:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> If red shift goes infinite then light no longer has energy. If it is a >> blueshift then light will have an infinite energy. These are the >> nonsense predictions at the event horizon associated with the end of >> time. No. They are indeed "nonsense predictions", but the nonsense is YOURS, and is not in GR itself. You need to LEARN what modern physics actually says. (hint: "end of time" is just plain wrong, and the "infinities" you claim are the result of "garbage in, garbage out" on YOUR part.) >> Gravity violates the energy laws of light. No, it doesn't violate the ACTUAL laws, as we currently know them. > Pound Rebka reveals gravity influencing light energy. Taking the > theory to an extreme reveals zero and infinite energy to light by > infinite red and blue shifts at event horizons. This proves that black > hole are wrong. No. This merely shows that you are completely ignorant of the ACTUAL theory. "Garbage in, garbage out" applies to most if not all of your claims. [I normally ignore your silly, idiotic statements, because they are completely divorced from science. Don't expect me to respond, until and unless you have something sensible to say.] Tom Roberts
From: purple on 10 May 2010 11:27 On 5/10/2010 9:51 AM, Tom Roberts wrote: > BURT wrote: >> On May 7, 5:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>> If red shift goes infinite then light no longer has energy. If it is a >>> blueshift then light will have an infinite energy. These are the >>> nonsense predictions at the event horizon associated with the end of [...] > [I normally ignore your silly, idiotic statements, because they > are completely divorced from science. Don't expect me to respond, > until and unless you have something sensible to say.] You mean there's an escape clause from "never"?
From: BURT on 11 May 2010 22:18
On May 10, 8:27 am, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 5/10/2010 9:51 AM, Tom Roberts wrote: > > > BURT wrote: > >> On May 7, 5:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >>> If red shift goes infinite then light no longer has energy. If it is a > >>> blueshift then light will have an infinite energy. These are the > >>> nonsense predictions at the event horizon associated with the end of > > [...] > > > [I normally ignore your silly, idiotic statements, because they > > are completely divorced from science. Don't expect me to respond, > > until and unless you have something sensible to say.] > > You mean there's an escape clause from "never"? There is no escape speed for light flow because it is a constant of C that does not change under gravity. Matter will slow down leaving gravity. But not light. Light always overcomes gravity by its fastest speed that does not slow down. There are no black holes. Mitch Raemsch |