Bundling VB Files?
in [Visual Studio]
|
Prev: hooking into a window and peeking/poking memory
Next: Mike Williams' ideal world (Was: Bundling VB Files?)
From: Mike Williams on 5 Aug 2010 15:22 "Tom Shelton" <tom_shelton(a)comcast.invalid> wrote in message news:i3f1a3$b4f$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > Mike Williams submitted this idea : >> "Tom Shelton" <tom_shelton(a)comcast.invalid> wrote in message >> news:i3ep27$tcl$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >>> The problem - you didn't know the framework. Seriously, >>> you can't approach the conversion without being intimately >>> familar with both platforms. >> >> Do you know what makes me laugh most of all? It's the fact that >> you really cannot see the implication of that statement you've >> just made! Hilarious! > > Hmmm... The implication that the framework is very powerful? No. That is not a conclusion that can be legitimately drawn from your statement, regardless of whether it is true or not. You seem to be having a lot of trouble with your powers of logical reasoning lately. This is the second or third time I have had to pull you up about it recently. The implication of your statement is that IT IS VERY DIFFERENT, and that VB.Net is most definitely NOT Visual Basic. It has some BASIC keywords sprinkled onto it of course, as a sort of window dressing, but that is just a dishonest ploy of the Micro$oft sales people in order to attempt to fool the public. It has certainly fooled you. Mike
From: Tom Shelton on 5 Aug 2010 15:38 Mike Williams used his keyboard to write : > "Tom Shelton" <tom_shelton(a)comcast.invalid> wrote in message > news:i3f1a3$b4f$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> Mike Williams submitted this idea : >>> "Tom Shelton" <tom_shelton(a)comcast.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:i3ep27$tcl$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> >>>> The problem - you didn't know the framework. Seriously, >>>> you can't approach the conversion without being intimately >>>> familar with both platforms. >>> >>> Do you know what makes me laugh most of all? It's the fact that >>> you really cannot see the implication of that statement you've >>> just made! Hilarious! >> >> Hmmm... The implication that the framework is very powerful? > > No. That is not a conclusion that can be legitimately drawn from your > statement, I don't believe one could conclude anything either way form the statement I made. But, if you took that way, then take my response a clarification. The response you mostly snipped away, and ignored. -- Tom Shelton
From: Access Developer on 5 Aug 2010 19:05 Tom, instead of cluttering the newsgroup, why didn't you _just_ answer the question (as I see you did) instead of arguing with Mike? The chances of the charter being changed, either to exclude or include VB.NET, are negligible and the chances that most of the people who answer questions here will cease to direct people asking VB.NET questions elsewhere is equally negligible. There are still microsoft.public... newsgroups not only specifically for VB.NET but for particular areas of VB.NET surviving in the news servers. Microsoft has dropped the microsoft.public newsgroups from their free news server "news.microsoft.com" and replaced them with forums. -- Larry Linson, Microsoft Office Access MVP Co-author: "Microsoft Access Small Business Solutions", published by Wiley Access newsgroup support is alive and well in USENET comp.databases.ms-access
From: ralph on 5 Aug 2010 19:26 On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 18:05:07 -0500, "Access Developer" <accdevel(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Tom, instead of cluttering the newsgroup, why didn't you _just_ answer the >question (as I see you did) instead of arguing with Mike? The chances of >the charter being changed, either to exclude or include VB.NET, are >negligible and the chances that most of the people who answer questions here >will cease to direct people asking VB.NET questions elsewhere is equally >negligible. > >There are still microsoft.public... newsgroups not only specifically for >VB.NET but for particular areas of VB.NET surviving in the news servers. >Microsoft has dropped the microsoft.public newsgroups from their free news >server "news.microsoft.com" and replaced them with forums. > Heartily agree. [Opps! Split infinity. Probably will catch hell for that too. <g>] Also Tom might consider that it isn't just getting 'A' answer that is useful but having that response 'reviewed' by other other users is equally valuable, and where better to insure that, than in group/forum where the majority of users of that product hang out? -ralph
From: Access Developer on 5 Aug 2010 19:34
The Big 8 Management Committee / Group, which has its own newsgroup, is in charge now. If anyone wants the charter changed, or, better yet, a new VB.NET newsgroup created, that's where to start. I used to subscribe to that newsgroup but when I changed news servers did not resubscribe, and have forgotten the exact name. But searching should reveal all. -- Larry Linson, Microsoft Office Access MVP Co-author: "Microsoft Access Small Business Solutions", published by Wiley Access newsgroup support is alive and well in USENET comp.databases.ms-access "Kevin Provance" <k(a)p.c> wrote > Unfortunatly, the men in charge of the charter and the FAQ are dead or > have > long disappeared and no successor was named...so getting some resolution > on > this will take some time. |