Bundling VB Files?
in [Visual Studio]
|
Prev: hooking into a window and peeking/poking memory
Next: Mike Williams' ideal world (Was: Bundling VB Files?)
From: Mike Williams on 3 Aug 2010 11:15 "Dee Earley" <dee.earley(a)icode.co.uk> wrote in message news:i397o6$gap$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... > On 03/08/2010 12:10, Mike Williams wrote: >> Another one posting dotnet stuff on the Classic VB group. Sheesh! > > The question came under Miscellaneous > VB so I answered it. The "misc" in the name of the group refers to miscellaneous questions about the real Visual Basic, not the pretend Visual Basic that even Micro$oft admit is different enough to warrant them creating a completely new and completely different newsgroup for it on their very own news servers, and to run both the real VB group and the pretend VB group concurrently. The question was very specific and the OP asked, "Aside from zipping up the entire tree, does anyone know of a way in VB2008 to have it store all the information about a form in one file". Did you not notice the "VB2008" in there? It was clearly a question about the pretend VB, for which Micro$oft have created a new and completely different newsgroup. Have all dotnet evangelists been so thoroughly brainwashed that they fail to see the difference even when Micro$oft themselves clearly do? Sheesh! Mike
From: Tom Shelton on 3 Aug 2010 11:27 on 8/3/2010, Mike Williams supposed : > "Dee Earley" <dee.earley(a)icode.co.uk> wrote in message > news:i397o6$gap$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... >> On 03/08/2010 12:10, Mike Williams wrote: >>> Another one posting dotnet stuff on the Classic VB group. Sheesh! >> >> The question came under Miscellaneous >> VB so I answered it. > > The "misc" in the name of the group refers to miscellaneous questions about > the real Visual Basic, not the pretend Visual Basic that even Micro$oft admit > is different enough to warrant them creating a completely new and completely > different newsgroup for it on their very own news servers, and to run both > the real VB group and the pretend VB group concurrently. > > The question was very specific and the OP asked, "Aside from zipping up the > entire tree, does anyone know of a way in VB2008 to have it store all the > information about a form in one file". Did you not notice the "VB2008" in > there? It was clearly a question about the pretend VB, for which Micro$oft > have created a new and completely different newsgroup. Have all dotnet > evangelists been so thoroughly brainwashed that they fail to see the > difference even when Micro$oft themselves clearly do? Sheesh! > > Mike You are really starting to come unhinged, Mike. When you actually have the athority to moderate this unmoderated group or to more importantly decide what is or is not vb - then I'll listen to what you have to say. Until then... LOL... -- Tom Shelton
From: Mike Williams on 3 Aug 2010 11:37 "Tom Shelton" <tom_shelton(a)comcast.invalid> wrote in message news:i39abq$mf1$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> "Dee Earley" <dee.earley(a)icode.co.uk> wrote in message >> The question came under Miscellaneous VB so I answered it. > > Exactly my point. > > Tom Shelton I'll repeat exactly what I have just said to Dee early about that one: The "misc" in the name of the group refers to miscellaneous questions about the real Visual Basic, not the pretend Visual Basic that even Micro$oft admit is different enough to warrant them creating a completely new and completely different newsgroup for it on their very own news servers, and to run both the real VB group and the pretend VB group concurrently. The question was very specific and the OP asked, "Aside from zipping up the entire tree, does anyone know of a way in VB2008 to have it store all the information about a form in one file". Did you not notice the "VB2008" in there? It was clearly a question about the pretend VB, for which Micro$oft have created a new and completely different newsgroup. Have all dotnet evangelists been so thoroughly brainwashed that they fail to see the difference even when Micro$oft themselves clearly do? Sheesh! It is abundantly clear that you, Mr Shelton, are here to deliberately cause trouble, and it would appear that Dee Early is doing the same. I really don't know what pleasure you trolls get out of deliberately annoying the users of Classic VB and attempting to destroy their group, but I'm sure you must get something out of it. It really is disgraceful behaviour. It makes me feel like going to the pretend VB groups and forums and doing the same, but I am trying hard to resist doing that. I just wish you dotnet trolls would try as hard to resist annoying us. Mike
From: Mike Williams on 3 Aug 2010 12:03 "Tom Shelton" <tom_shelton(a)comcast.invalid> wrote in message news:i39bib$sfv$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > And I'll say it once again... Visual Basic is a proprietary platform whose > sysntax is > soley owned by a single mega-corp. Because it is > proprietary, on Microsoft gets to decide what is or is > not Visual Basic - not you. Period. Well that in fact is part of the problem, and it is because consumer laws regarding software are more than a quarter of a century behind consumer laws regarding tangible goods and services. If a food company sold a product that they called Micro$oft Curried Chicken and if after selling it for a number of years they decided to reduce the amount of chicken and add something different, perhaps pork belly and hog fat, and if they continued to call it Microsoft Curried Chicken, or perhaps Micro$oft Curried Chicken 2008, then they would be required to stop calling it by that name and they would find themselves subject to heavy fines in a Court of Law, and in many countries they would even face imprisonment if they continued to do it regardless. Luckily, though, we here in the EU are working on that one. One day the consumer laws regarding software will be brought into line with consumer laws regarding other products. > Your free to do that... And if I'm around and I feel > like it - I'm going to answer their questions - since > this is a VB group. That's because you are a troll and what you do is deliberately designed to annoy people. Mike
From: Dee Earley on 3 Aug 2010 12:05
On 03/08/2010 16:37, Mike Williams wrote: > "Tom Shelton" <tom_shelton(a)comcast.invalid> wrote in message > news:i39abq$mf1$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>> "Dee Earley" <dee.earley(a)icode.co.uk> wrote in message >>> The question came under Miscellaneous VB so I answered it. >> >> Exactly my point. >> >> Tom Shelton > > I'll repeat exactly what I have just said to Dee early about that one: Who? > The "misc" in the name of the group refers to miscellaneous questions > about the real Visual Basic, not the pretend Visual Basic Again, citations needed. > Micro$oft admit is different enough to warrant them creating a > completely new and completely different newsgroup for it on their very > own news servers, and to run both the real VB group and the pretend VB > group concurrently. Yes, microsoft split their groups. Normal Usenet just has this one. > It is abundantly clear that you, Mr Shelton, are here to deliberately > cause trouble, and it would appear that Dee Early is doing the same. I > really don't know what pleasure you trolls get out of deliberately > annoying the users of Classic VB. What, like me? As I said, I use many languages, but 95% of my time is in VB6. If my posts about VB.net in an "any VB" group annoy you, then feel free to killfile my email address. > It makes me feel like going to the pretend VB groups and > forums and doing the same, but I am trying hard to resist doing that. Why? Those groups are normally explicitly vb.net only If they aren't, feel free to give answers that are relevant to the question. -- Dee Earley (dee.earley(a)icode.co.uk) i-Catcher Development Team iCode Systems (Replies direct to my email address will be ignored. Please reply to the group.) |