From: " SNIP OFF TOPIC>" on
X-No-Archive: Yes
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 11:51:49 +1300
From: Autymn D. C. on
On Dec 28 2009, 10:49 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:58:14 -0800 (PST), BruceS
> <bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >  I fully expect death to be
> >the end of me, but am willing to be surprised.  Anyway, who needs life
> >after death when statistics show us that we have a good chance of
> >immortality?
>
> [Hammond]
>   We have no chance of immortality in this life.  All of
> history proves that.  The only known possibility of
> immortality is described in the New Testament, and has now
> become a scientific possibility.  Which is what we are
> talking about.

Alcor. Souls/Ghosts/Gods are no more immortal than men and wihts.
From: " SNIP HECLKER>" on
X-No-Archive: Yes
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 21:07:53 -0800 (PST)
From: " SNIP HECLKER>" on
X-No-Archive: Yes
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 21:36:35 -0800
From: Autymn D. C. on
On Jan 2, 2:07 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 00:15:50 +1300, "Geopelia"
> <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>    The same goes for Life After Death.  If it exists it is a
> scientifically explainable phenomena just like everything

phenomena -> phenomenon -> fainomenon, you biblical charlatan Farmer.

> else that exists, including "God" which has already been
> scientifically proven to exist (Hammond 2003, peer reviewed
> literature).

proven wrong (Everyone 2003–2009) by everyone who understands
relativity and category.