From: Spiro Trikaliotis on 10 Dec 2006 09:23 Hello, Payton Byrd wrote: > Groepaz wrote: >> Wolfgang Moser wrote: >> >>> I always thought that Vista won't accepts uncertified >>> to better say unsigned drivers. >> >> afaik they only did that for the 64bit version >> > That's correct, however, you can sign the driver yourself. Yes, if you spend $500 p.a. for the needed VeriSign certificate, you can sign your driver yourself. BTW: VeriSign would not give some certificates in some countries. Thus, if you live in such a country, you're out of the game. You can use other signed certificates if you run user-mode drivers, but for kernel-mode drivers, you need a certificate which is allowed by MS. Regards, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://opencbm.sf.net/ http://www.trikaliotis.net/ http://www.viceteam.org/
From: Spiro Trikaliotis on 10 Dec 2006 09:25 Hello, Pete Rittwage wrote: > Sometimes CBM4WIN does something strange where I have to > uninstall/reinstall the driver. Hu? Which version do you use? 0.4.0, or some later one? > No big deal, just power off the drive, do a 'instcbm -r', power on the > drive, then do 'instcbm' again and it usually comes back to it's > senses. Does switched the drive off and on help, too? Or does it help if you do not switch off the drive, but do instcbm -r & instcbm alone? THESE are the reports I would like to get to be able to correct the problems! Regards, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://opencbm.sf.net/ http://www.trikaliotis.net/ http://www.viceteam.org/
From: Pete Rittwage on 10 Dec 2006 15:59 Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > Hello, > > Pete Rittwage wrote: > >> Sometimes CBM4WIN does something strange where I have to >> uninstall/reinstall the driver. > > Hu? Which version do you use? 0.4.0, or some later one? > >> No big deal, just power off the drive, do a 'instcbm -r', power on the >> drive, then do 'instcbm' again and it usually comes back to it's >> senses. > > Does switched the drive off and on help, too? Or does it help if you do > not switch off the drive, but do instcbm -r & instcbm alone? > > THESE are the reports I would like to get to be able to correct the > problems! Hi Spiro, Sorry, I always figured I was locking up the driver with my MNIB code since it's constantly under development, so I never mentioned it. -- - Pete Rittwage http://rittwage.com C64 Preservation Project http://c64preservation.com
From: Payton Byrd on 16 Dec 2006 12:30 Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > Hello, > > Payton Byrd wrote: > >> Groepaz wrote: >>> Wolfgang Moser wrote: >>> >>>> I always thought that Vista won't accepts uncertified >>>> to better say unsigned drivers. >>> afaik they only did that for the 64bit version >>> >> That's correct, however, you can sign the driver yourself. > > Yes, if you spend $500 p.a. for the needed VeriSign certificate, you can > sign your driver yourself. > > BTW: VeriSign would not give some certificates in some countries. Thus, > if you live in such a country, you're out of the game. > > You can use other signed certificates if you run user-mode drivers, but > for kernel-mode drivers, you need a certificate which is allowed by MS. > > Regards, > Spiro. > Did the Daemon Tools guys pay for their cert? I don't think so because Vista warned me that it was a self-generated certificate. I think they just made a new certificate using Microsoft's tools and signed the driver.
From: iAN CooG on 16 Dec 2006 12:35 Payton Byrd <plbyrd(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > Did the Daemon Tools guys pay for their cert? I don't think so > because Vista warned me that it was a self-generated certificate. I > think they just made a new certificate using Microsoft's tools and > signed the driver. So? -- -=[]=--- iAN CooG/HokutoForce ---=[]=- No honey, it's only a computer, PLEASE put down the gun..
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: The Spectrum is a computer for GIRLS !!! Next: More recommended FD drives for the 1581 Kit? |