Prev: Earth destroyed by Hawking radiation
Next: Question about gravity
From: BURT on 15 Mar 2010 00:42
On Mar 14, 12:22 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/2010/03/10/2010-03-10_cerns_lar...
> "Scientists have made a major discovery using the Large Hadron
> Collider, the world's largest atom-smasher, a $5 billion feat of
> engineering built to re-create conditions in the universe just after
> the big bang:
>
> That it needs to be shut down for repairs."
>
> Pentcho Valev wrote:
>
> COLLIDER-GATE:
>
> http://www.trinitynews.ie/index.php/features/features/671-could-it-be...
> "The alternative explanation for the series of unfortunate events that
> have befallen the LHC is hardly less bizarre. Two otherwise respected
> physicists are now claiming that the much hypothesized Higgs Boson
> particle might have a "backward causation" effect to stop itself being
> discovered. In other words, the particle does not wish to be created,
> or its creation would have such cataclysmic results that the actual
> universe itself does not wish for it to be created. Thus, at the
> moment that it is created in the future, forces travel back in time to
> sabotage the collider before it gets the chance to be made. In pop
> culture terms, this is basically what happens in Back to the Future,
> when Marty McFly travels back in time and accidentally erases his
> future self by stopping his parents from falling in love. (...) The
> only problem is that the future has cursed the project. The hypothesis
> seems so bizarre as to be laughable, but for the fact that it is
> supported by two leading physicists, Holger Bech Nielsen, of the Niels
> Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, and Masao Ninomiya of the Yukawa
> Institute for Theoretical Physics in Kyoto, Japan. They have
> postulated this idea over the last two years, publishing it in a
> series of scientific papers with titles such as "Test of Effect From
> Future in Large Hadron Collider: a Proposal". (...) But perhaps we
> should not mock these theories. After all, Einstein himself wrote,
> "for those of us who believe in physics, this separation between past,
> present and future is only an illusion"."
>
> http://consideronline.org/2010/03/10/the-large-hadron-collider-is-sti...
> "The Large Hadron Collider Is Still a Fantastic Waste of Money...."The
> Large Hadron Collider (LHC) must close at the end of 2011 for up to a
> year to address design issues, according to an LHC director. Dr Steve
> Myers told BBC News the faults will delay the machine reaching its
> full potential for two years." Basically, the LHC is still probably an
> egregiously bad investment. Dr. Myers does caution that the LHC is
> "its own prototype," and while its shutdowns get huge press coverage,
> "you don't hear about the thousands or hundreds of thousands of other
> areas that have gone incredibly well." Fair enough. But these
> shutdowns are still hugely expensive, and they push any benefits the
> LHC may yield to humankind back into an increasingly distant future.
> The scientists at CERN have yet to convince me that the LHC is a good
> idea."
>
> Pentcho Valev
> pva...(a)yahoo.com

There is wave particle, wave atom and light wave. Waves are round and
Sin in nature.
Space, time and energy flow.

Mitch Raemsch
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Earth destroyed by Hawking radiation
Next: Question about gravity