Earth destroyed by Hawking radiation
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: RELATIVITY INCOMPATIBLE WITH QUANTUM MECHANICS OR WITH ITSELF?
Next: CLIMATE-GATE, RELATIVITY-GATE, ENTROPY-GATE
From: guskz on 14 Mar 2010 14:12 LONG AGO, my posts stated that Europe's proton collision would generate EXPONENTIALLY more particles as the collision energy is increased. "All" the scientists in Europe did not know this, and now they will shut it down for "two whole years" to reinforce the collider. These extra particles come from Hawking radiation particles and from multiple sequential collisions with previous collision particles. This substantially modifies the equations for both the Schwartzchild Radius and Black Hole creation. ---------------------------------- My 2nd prediction was that this EXPONENTIAL generation of more particles will form a circumferential wall barrier (Barricade Horizon) around the collision zone where colliding particles and energy can no longer escape and these will then be sufficient fuel for the black hole to grow and destroy the Earth. As this wall(s) gets EXPONENTIALLY more and more bombarded externally it will provide even more fuel for the internally Barricaded zone and it's nascent black hole. ------------------------------------- As a visual example, Earth is stable like a dry piece of paper or Uranium, as one section receives sufficient energy to cause deformation/deterioration the rest ignites through a chain reaction.
From: Sam Wormley on 14 Mar 2010 14:22 On 3/14/10 1:12 PM, guskz(a)hotmail.com wrote: > LONG AGO, my posts stated that Europe's proton collision would > generate EXPONENTIALLY more particles as the collision energy is > increased. > You were wrong.
From: dlzc on 14 Mar 2010 15:35 On Mar 14, 11:22 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/14/10 1:12 PM, gu...(a)hotmail.com wrote: > > > LONG AGO, my posts stated that Europe's > > proton collision would generate EXPONENTIALLY > > more particles as the collision energy is > > increased. > > You were wrong. And he continues to be both wrong and annoying. David A. Smith
From: Darwin123 on 14 Mar 2010 16:03 On Mar 14, 2:12 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > As this wall(s) gets EXPONENTIALLY more and more bombarded externally > it will provide even more fuel for the internally Barricaded zone and > it's nascent black hole. > ------------------------------------- > > As a visual example, Earth is stable like a dry piece of paper or > Uranium, as one section receives sufficient energy to cause > deformation/deterioration the rest ignites through a chain reaction. So now you claim that the magnetic hole will grow exponentially, but slowly. I have heard all this before. Ever see the movie, "Magnetic Monster"? Famous quote from the movie: "There are no lone wolves in science."
From: Don Stockbauer on 14 Mar 2010 21:01
On Mar 14, 3:03 pm, Darwin123 <drosen0...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Mar 14, 2:12 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > As this wall(s) gets EXPONENTIALLY more and more bombarded externally > > it will provide even more fuel for the internally Barricaded zone and > > it's nascent black hole. > > ------------------------------------- > > > As a visual example, Earth is stable like a dry piece of paper or > > Uranium, as one section receives sufficient energy to cause > > deformation/deterioration the rest ignites through a chain reaction. > > So now you claim that the magnetic hole will grow exponentially, > but slowly. I have heard all this before. > Ever see the movie, "Magnetic Monster"? > Famous quote from the movie: "There are no lone wolves in > science." There are if you're studying wolf behavior, especially the behavior of lone wolves. |