Prev: THE QUEST FOR THE ULTIMATE THEORY OF TIME, AN INTRODUCTION TOIRREVERSIBILITY
Next: Einstein and Detecting motion
From: eric gisse on 23 May 2010 02:53
Robert L. Oldershaw wrote:

> On May 22, 7:40 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "two oars"? I don't even have one!
> -------------------------------------
>
> Hey Alejandro! M = (j{j+1}/a^2)^1/4 (674.8 MeV)
>
> Lambda j = 3/2 a = 5/7 99.0%
>
> Sigma j = 3/2 a = 5/8 99.6%
>
> Xi(1320) j = 3/2 a = 1/2 99.2%
>
> Xi(1535) j = 3/2 a = 3/8 99.97%
>
> Omega(-) j = 4/2 a = 2/5 99.85%
>
> tau j = 1/2 a = 1/8 99.96% !!!
>
> 10 of 10 mass/stability peaks retrodicted SPOT-ON!
>
> Average relative agreement is 99.6%

Thus the delusion of numerology.

Still off by a few thousand standard deviations on average with parameters
that have no physical basis.

> -------------------------------
>
> Want to see something freaky?
>
> muon j = 1/1836 a = 1 97.5% Is that weird, or what!

An arbitrary number of parameters can reproduce an arbitrary number to
arbitrary precision.

>
> HOUSTON: WE HAVE A NEW AND MUCH IMPROVED PLANCK SCALE! NOT TO MENTION
> A FURTHER GENERALIZATION OF GENERAL COVARIANCE AND NEW SCALING FOR
> GRAVITATION.
>
> SWEET and SWEET,
> RLO
> www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw

Standard crank fare. You think you have something special and ignore all the
evidence to the contrary.
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 23 May 2010 16:53
On May 22, 1:40 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu>
wrote:
> On May 22, 7:09 am, Hayek <haye...(a)nospam.xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
> Lambda (1115.7 MeV)  j = 3/2  a = 5/7  M = 1111.08 MeV  [99..6%]
>
> Sweet!
-----------------------------------------------


Hey Alejandro! M = (j{j+1}/a^2)^1/4 (674.8 MeV)


Lambda j = 3/2 a = 5/7 99.0%


Sigma j = 3/2 a = 5/8 99.6%


Xi(1320) j = 3/2 a = 1/2 99.2%


Xi(1535) j = 3/2 a = 3/8 99.97%


Omega(-) j = 4/2 a = 2/5 99.85%


tau j = 1/2 a = 1/8 99.96% !!!


10 of 10 mass/stability peaks retrodicted SPOT-ON!


Average relative agreement is 99.6%
-------------------------------


Want to see something freaky?


muon j = 1/1836 a = 1 97.5% Is that weird, or what!


HOUSTON: WE HAVE A NEW AND MUCH IMPROVED PLANCK SCALE! NOT TO MENTION
A FURTHER GENERALIZATION OF GENERAL COVARIANCE AND NEW SCALING FOR
GRAVITATION.


SWEET and SWEET,
RLO
www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw
From: Sue... on 23 May 2010 19:48
On May 23, 4:53 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu>
wrote:
[...]

============

>
> HOUSTON: WE HAVE A NEW AND MUCH IMPROVED PLANCK SCALE! NOT TO MENTION
> A FURTHER GENERALIZATION OF GENERAL COVARIANCE AND NEW SCALING FOR
> GRAVITATION.

You are too late. Houston has just removed the liberal
bias that has accumulated on the value of pi so that
it again conforms to the biblical value of 3.0 as
demonstrated in the construction of Soloman's temple
and is the true will of the lord and saviour.

Your scale won't work there.

I suggest Boston or San Francisco might be a better
place to drum up some interest in your new scale.


>
> SWEET and SWEET,

Harumph! :-)

http://www.elyrics.net/read/d/dixie-chicks-lyrics/not-ready-to-make-nice-lyrics.html

Sue...

> RLOwww.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw

From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 23 May 2010 22:21
On May 22, 1:40 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu>
wrote:

> On May 22, 7:09 am, Hayek <haye...(a)nospam.xs4all.nl> wrote:

> Lambda (1115.7 MeV) j = 3/2 a = 5/7 M = 1111.08 MeV [99.6%]


> Sweet!

-----------------------------------------------

Hey Alejandro! M = (j{j+1}/a^2)^1/4 (674.8 MeV)

Lambda j = 3/2 a = 5/7 99.0%

Sigma j = 3/2 a = 5/8 99.6%

Xi(1320) j = 3/2 a = 1/2 99.2%

Xi(1535) j = 3/2 a = 3/8 99.97%

Omega(-) j = 4/2 a = 2/5 99.85%

tau j = 1/2 a = 1/8 99.96% !!!

10 of 10 mass/stability peaks retrodicted SPOT-ON!

Average relative agreement is 99.6%
-------------------------------

Want to see something freaky?

muon j = 1/1836 a = 1 97.5% Is that weird, or what!

HOUSTON: WE HAVE A NEW AND MUCH IMPROVED PLANCK SCALE! NOT TO MENTION
A FURTHER GENERALIZATION OF GENERAL COVARIANCE AND NEW SCALING FOR
GRAVITATION.

SWEET and SWEET,
RLO
www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw
From: eric gisse on 23 May 2010 23:04
Robert L. Oldershaw wrote:

> On May 22, 1:40 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> On May 22, 7:09 am, Hayek <haye...(a)nospam.xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
>> Lambda (1115.7 MeV) j = 3/2 a = 5/7 M = 1111.08 MeV [99.6%]
>
>
>> Sweet!
>
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Hey Alejandro! M = (j{j+1}/a^2)^1/4 (674.8 MeV)
>
> Lambda j = 3/2 a = 5/7 99.0%
>
> Sigma j = 3/2 a = 5/8 99.6%
>
> Xi(1320) j = 3/2 a = 1/2 99.2%
>
> Xi(1535) j = 3/2 a = 3/8 99.97%
>
> Omega(-) j = 4/2 a = 2/5 99.85%
>
> tau j = 1/2 a = 1/8 99.96% !!!
>
> 10 of 10 mass/stability peaks retrodicted SPOT-ON!

But your numbers aren't 'spot-on' - they are merely 'close as long as you
don't look to the right of the decimal'.

You can't explain the parameters you use, and you can't make testable
predictions. You are not doing science.

>
> Average relative agreement is 99.6%
> -------------------------------
>
> Want to see something freaky?
>
> muon j = 1/1836 a = 1 97.5% Is that weird, or what!
>
> HOUSTON: WE HAVE A NEW AND MUCH IMPROVED PLANCK SCALE! NOT TO MENTION
> A FURTHER GENERALIZATION OF GENERAL COVARIANCE AND NEW SCALING FOR
> GRAVITATION.
>
> SWEET and SWEET,
> RLO
> www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: THE QUEST FOR THE ULTIMATE THEORY OF TIME, AN INTRODUCTION TOIRREVERSIBILITY
Next: Einstein and Detecting motion