Prev: THE QUEST FOR THE ULTIMATE THEORY OF TIME, AN INTRODUCTION TOIRREVERSIBILITY
Next: Einstein and Detecting motion
From: hanson on 24 May 2010 04:46
Yo, Bob,
while others beat on you, I congratulate you for the
work you have done so far.
>
I hope that one day you'll get all the numbers within
99+ %, like others have done, decades before you, with
different model assumptions, but also based on nature's
self similarity which appears, empirically, to rule over
all scales and domains... as is illustrate by the simple
fact that in physics the most common word used to
explain insights... happen to be the words: "it's like..."
>
I note that you equate your state "j" = kGM2/c, a GR
Kerr solution... But that pushes the problem merely
up an notch because of your "k" in there.... ahahaha..
and what physical event is your "a" factor denoting?
>
Is there a physical model in your mind, based on nature's
Self-similarity that can liken "j" and "a" to some familiar,
experimentally verifiably event/state or process?
>
Carry on, good luck and take, Old Timer...
hanson
>
>
"Robert L. Oldershaw" <rloldershaw(a)amherst.edu> wrote:
> On May 22, 1:40 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> On May 22, 7:09 am, Hayek <haye...(a)nospam.xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
>> Lambda (1115.7 MeV) j = 3/2 a = 5/7 M = 1111.08 MeV [99.6%]
>
>
>> Sweet!
>
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Hey Alejandro! M = (j{j+1}/a^2)^1/4 (674.8 MeV)
>
> Lambda j = 3/2 a = 5/7 99.0%
>
> Sigma j = 3/2 a = 5/8 99.6%
>
> Xi(1320) j = 3/2 a = 1/2 99.2%
>
> Xi(1535) j = 3/2 a = 3/8 99.97%
>
> Omega(-) j = 4/2 a = 2/5 99.85%
>
> tau j = 1/2 a = 1/8 99.96% !!!
>
> 10 of 10 mass/stability peaks retrodicted SPOT-ON!
>
> Average relative agreement is 99.6%
> -------------------------------
>
> Want to see something freaky?
>
> muon j = 1/1836 a = 1 97.5% Is that weird, or what!
>
> HOUSTON: WE HAVE A NEW AND MUCH IMPROVED PLANCK SCALE! NOT TO MENTION
> A FURTHER GENERALIZATION OF GENERAL COVARIANCE AND NEW SCALING FOR
> GRAVITATION.
>
> SWEET and SWEET,
> RLO
> www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: Jerry on 24 May 2010 23:28
On May 23, 3:53 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu>
wrote:
> On May 22, 1:40 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...(a)amherst.edu>
> wrote:> On May 22, 7:09 am, Hayek <haye...(a)nospam.xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
> > Lambda (1115.7 MeV) j = 3/2 a = 5/7 M = 1111.08 MeV [99.6%]
>
> > Sweet!
>
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Hey Alejandro! M = (j{j+1}/a^2)^1/4 (674.8 MeV)
>
> Lambda j = 3/2 a = 5/7 99.0%
>
> Sigma j = 3/2 a = 5/8 99.6%
>
> Xi(1320) j = 3/2 a = 1/2 99.2%
>
> Xi(1535) j = 3/2 a = 3/8 99.97%
>
> Omega(-) j = 4/2 a = 2/5 99.85%
>
> tau j = 1/2 a = 1/8 99.96% !!!
>
> 10 of 10 mass/stability peaks retrodicted SPOT-ON!
>
> Average relative agreement is 99.6%

From what I can see, you are using the following selection rules:

j = k/2 where k = 1,2,3,4
a = m/n where n = 5,7,8 and m = 1..n

This defines a 72 line mass spectrum between 627.972 MeV and
1776.17 MeV, which you then compare with measured particle
masses.

Shall I suggest a simpler spectrum which yields equally good
results? Have you ever heard of a geometric series?

M = 627.972 r^n where r = (1776.17/627.972)^(1/72)
and n = 0..72

Let us compare with a few actual particle masses:

M n retrodiction Accuracy
rho 770 14 768.67 99.82%
omega 783 15 779.85 99.60%
p+ 938.27 28 940.89 99.72%
n 939.57 28 940.89 99.85%
eta' 957.75 29 954.58 99.66%
Lambda0 1115.68 40 1118.92 99.71%
Sigma1 1192 44 1185.45 99.45%
Xi0 1320 51 1311.55 99.36%
N 1440 57 1430.03 99.30%
Omega- 1672.45 68 1676.48 99.76%

Average relative agreement is 99.62%

Jerry
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: THE QUEST FOR THE ULTIMATE THEORY OF TIME, AN INTRODUCTION TOIRREVERSIBILITY
Next: Einstein and Detecting motion