Can extra processing threads help in this case?
in [MFC]
|
From: Tom Serface on 26 Mar 2010 14:15 We just use IIS for our intranet web applications. We can install it on our servers as they are manufactured and it's really easy to set up. There are restrictions to doing web applications of course, but you can do a lot of coding server-side if you know the server will have access and permission to update areas on the intranet. Tom "Peter Olcott" <NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message news:toydnSprNqitejHWnZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > > "Tom Serface" <tom(a)camaswood.com> wrote in message > news:uiYs3GQzKHA.5040(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> Hi Peter, >> >> I don't think the proximity is the only gating factor. Bandwidth for >> connected servers, the path of the data, etc. all matter. If your users >> are directly connecting to your server it may make a difference. It must >> make some sort of difference because every professional download site I >> know of has multiple "mirror" sites so that you can select one closest to >> you. If nothing else, distributing it may make some people use other >> servers and spread the cycles needed to read and send the data off a >> little less arduous. >> >> Tom > > Yes, and it also just occured to me that in special cases I may even be > able to provide an intranet webserver. >
From: Tom Serface on 26 Mar 2010 14:16 Nice concept. I think one of the challenges will be how to restrict or track "uses". You may have that all worked out though. Tom "Peter Olcott" <NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message news:mIWdnZAOJL5pejHWnZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > I was going for something more like a dime per use, pay at least a buck in > advance, your account remains open indefinitely.
From: Peter Olcott on 26 Mar 2010 14:17 "Liviu" <lab2k1(a)gmail.c0m> wrote in message news:eBgie4QzKHA.2436(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > "Hector Santos" <sant9442(a)nospam.gmail.com> wrote... >> >> You're not going to get anything done because you don't >> have >> the capacity to do so. You haven't yet in what 2-3 years? > > "I filed a provisional patent last August" - Peter Olcott, > 12/14/2001 > > (message #584 in thread of 881 at > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++/msg/f8161ee71a584326?hl=en) This patent issued in 2005. The task that I am undertaking is very large. Developing projects that each require several man-years while holding down a full-time job takes a long time. It is like trying to get a bachelors degree taking one course at a time. > > >> Peter Olcott wrote: >>> "Hector Santos" <sant9442(a)nospam.gmail.com> wrote... >>>> >>>> Of course, the real ultimate question is if you will >>>> finished by the >>>> time your patent expires. >>> >>> The latest improvements would likely qualify for another >>> patent, thus >>> extending the term, plus there is a whole other >>> invention of using >>> this technology to provide an easy to use universal >>> graphical user >>> interface scripting language. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
From: Pete Delgado on 26 Mar 2010 14:19 "Peter Olcott" <NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message news:oIGdnZCeT6dnVTHWnZ2dnUVZ_jadnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > > Outlook express is losing some of the postings. I had to reply to a reply > to Pete's message yesterday because Pete's original message never made it > to outlook express. This simply is a result of the way the nntp servers propogate the posts. An intelligent person might see an analogy and then question their premise about server locality and how tcp/ip traffic finds it's route to its ultimate destination and whether the physical locality of a server guarantees a specific route. That same intelligent person might then do some research... ;-) -Pete
From: Peter Olcott on 26 Mar 2010 14:31
"Tom Serface" <tom(a)camaswood.com> wrote in message news:OxTzNBRzKHA.264(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > We just use IIS for our intranet web applications. We can > install it on our servers as they are manufactured and > it's really easy to set up. > > There are restrictions to doing web applications of > course, but you can do a lot of coding server-side if you > know the server will have access and permission to update > areas on the intranet. > > Tom My trick is to make this web server installed a the client site have as close to as possible impenetrable security because I am adding trade secret to my intellectual property protection. I think that I have this essentially figured out. The one part that I do not have completely figured out is exactly how I can make it close to impossible for anyone to physically open the machine without detection. I have figured out ways to make this mostly (but not completely) moot. I have also figured out ways to make case access security extremely difficult to circumvent. > > "Peter Olcott" <NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message > news:toydnSprNqitejHWnZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d(a)giganews.com... >> >> "Tom Serface" <tom(a)camaswood.com> wrote in message >> news:uiYs3GQzKHA.5040(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> I don't think the proximity is the only gating factor. >>> Bandwidth for connected servers, the path of the data, >>> etc. all matter. If your users are directly connecting >>> to your server it may make a difference. It must make >>> some sort of difference because every professional >>> download site I know of has multiple "mirror" sites so >>> that you can select one closest to you. If nothing >>> else, distributing it may make some people use other >>> servers and spread the cycles needed to read and send >>> the data off a little less arduous. >>> >>> Tom >> >> Yes, and it also just occured to me that in special cases >> I may even be able to provide an intranet webserver. >> |