Can extra processing threads help in this case?
in [MFC]
|
From: Peter Olcott on 26 Mar 2010 14:32 "Tom Serface" <tom(a)camaswood.com> wrote in message news:OLTDvBRzKHA.1236(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Nice concept. I think one of the challenges will be how > to restrict or track "uses". You may have that all worked > out though. > > Tom > > "Peter Olcott" <NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message > news:mIWdnZAOJL5pejHWnZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > >> I was going for something more like a dime per use, pay >> at least a buck in advance, your account remains open >> indefinitely. > > Just the architecture not the details.
From: Peter Olcott on 26 Mar 2010 14:38 "Pete Delgado" <Peter.Delgado(a)NoSpam.com> wrote in message news:eGrSiDRzKHA.5288(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > > "Peter Olcott" <NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote in message > news:oIGdnZCeT6dnVTHWnZ2dnUVZ_jadnZ2d(a)giganews.com... >> >> Outlook express is losing some of the postings. I had to >> reply to a reply to Pete's message yesterday because >> Pete's original message never made it to outlook express. > > This simply is a result of the way the nntp servers > propogate the posts. An intelligent person might see an > analogy and then question their premise about server > locality and how tcp/ip traffic finds it's route to its > ultimate destination and whether the physical locality of > a server guarantees a specific route. That same > intelligent person might then do some research... ;-) > > -Pete > > I never said anything about guarantees, I already know that the internet is an unpredictable stochastic process. Even though internet performance can not be precisely predicted average performance and standard deviations from this average can be measured. If I must guarantee performance then I will probably need a real-time OS that is providing a local intranet web server. My goal for the immediate term is to do the best that I can within the binding constraints that exist. On the average a closer server provide better throughput than one that is further away.
From: Pete Delgado on 26 Mar 2010 14:40 "Tom Serface" <tom(a)camaswood.com> wrote in message news:u76fMKQzKHA.6140(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Better to continue questioning and trying to understand more about the > technique imo. Tom, In a sense I agree with you, but shouldn't the path of questioning and understanding consist of more than just asking questions of others and then debating with them why you, without any particular knowledge of a subject, feel that the advice given to you was not correct? I believe that at some point it is up to the individual asking the questions to do a *little* bit of research! -Pete
From: Liviu on 26 Mar 2010 14:46 "Peter Olcott" <NoSpam(a)OCR4Screen.com> wrote... > "Liviu" <lab2k1(a)gmail.c0m> wrote... >> "Hector Santos" <sant9442(a)nospam.gmail.com> wrote... >>> >>> You're not going to get anything done because you don't have >>> the capacity to do so. You haven't yet in what 2-3 years? >> >> "I filed a provisional patent last August" - Peter Olcott, 12/14/2001 >> >> (message #584 in thread of 881 at >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++/msg/f8161ee71a584326?hl=en) > > This patent issued in 2005. The task that I am undertaking is very > large. I am not even trying to argue that now. But you are talking _years_ in the works, yet demonstrated deep confusion over elementary matters and ignored most of the sound advice volunteered here. Then you say "I do not have the time to learn inessential new things". Nothing personal, of course, and don't know that you even realize it, but that paints you somewhere between utterly arrogant and a complete kook. Liviu
From: Hector Santos on 26 Mar 2010 14:57
Peter Olcott wrote: > The experts are telling me that my real-time process does > not need to be memory resident. Once again, you are lying to suit your needs. You really don't understand how the Intel chip and Preemptive and Protected Mode operating systems works which you explained over and over again, and even provided LINKS for your reading and verification. If I had to guess, the reason why you don't understand any of this is because you are clueless of the history of the INTEL chip starting with its Memory Segmentation Model to the introduction of Real Mode vs Protected Model hardware and operating systems, starting with DMPI. Start reading about the Intel Chip, Memory Segmentation, Protected Mode Operating Systems and then maybe, just maybe, but I extremely doubt it, you will get some inkling of whats going on. -- HLS |