Prev: GUESS WHO'S BACK TO HELP US CELEBRATE EARTH DAY? .
Next: Proton Radius Cannot Be Derived From Standard Model
From: Brad Guth on 22 Apr 2010 01:50 On Apr 21, 7:49 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 21, 7:17 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 21, 6:59 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 21, 6:25 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 21, 6:15 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 21, 5:56 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 21, 5:41 pm, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Apr 22, 10:35 am, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > In other words, if something substantial (such as a 10 solar mass > > > > > > > > super-star and its tidal swarm of Jupiter+ planets) was headed as > > > > > > > > seemingly directly towards us at c (-299.8e3 km/sec), could that item > > > > > > > > regardless of its size, mass and vibrance be detected? > > > > > > > > > Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / Guth Usenet > > > > > > > > Nothing with mass can have a speed of c .. so your question is not > > > > > > > valid. But if it was travelling fast enough, its light would be > > > > > > > Doppler shifted to beyond the visible spectrum .. but then, and lower > > > > > > > frequency EMR from it could be shifted into the visible spectrum. > > > > > > > We're told by our peers that the outer parts of our universe is likely > > > > > > expanding/receding at c, as sort of leaving us in its photon dust that > > > > > > we'll never detect. > > > > > > > Stop avoiding the truth-seeking context or intent of my topic. > > > > > > > LHC proves that matter can be artificially directed towards other > > > > > > matter at a closing velocity of <2c. > > > > > > > ~ BG > > > > > > Increased strength of gravity blueshifts light from its fundamental by > > > > > gravity Gamma factor. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > Are you suggesting gravity has the same velocity as photons? > > > > > I thought gravity was worth at least 2c. > > > > > ~ BG- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Two light waves traveling toward one another (in a gravity) would > > > converge on a center at 2C. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > That seems likely, but even if each were making a velocity towards the > > other at .5c for a closing velocity of c, could we as one item detect > > the other? > > But light never travels in empty space at .5c > > > > > ~ BG- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - I didn't say it did, or didn't. Forget about the speed of those mystery photons, and just focus upon detecting whatever's coming towards us at -c. (just like our universe is supposedly expanding at c) ~ BG
From: Brad Guth on 22 Apr 2010 01:53 On Apr 21, 7:43 pm, palsing <pnals...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 21, 7:17 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Apr 21, 6:59 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 21, 6:25 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 21, 6:15 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 21, 5:56 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 21, 5:41 pm, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Apr 22, 10:35 am, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > In other words, if something substantial (such as a 10 solar mass > > > > > > > > super-star and its tidal swarm of Jupiter+ planets) was headed as > > > > > > > > seemingly directly towards us at c (-299.8e3 km/sec), could that item > > > > > > > > regardless of its size, mass and vibrance be detected? > > > > > > > > > Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / Guth Usenet > > > > > > > > Nothing with mass can have a speed of c .. so your question is not > > > > > > > valid. But if it was travelling fast enough, its light would be > > > > > > > Doppler shifted to beyond the visible spectrum .. but then, and lower > > > > > > > frequency EMR from it could be shifted into the visible spectrum. > > > > > > > We're told by our peers that the outer parts of our universe is likely > > > > > > expanding/receding at c, as sort of leaving us in its photon dust that > > > > > > we'll never detect. > > > > > > > Stop avoiding the truth-seeking context or intent of my topic. > > > > > > > LHC proves that matter can be artificially directed towards other > > > > > > matter at a closing velocity of <2c. > > > > > > > ~ BG > > > > > > Increased strength of gravity blueshifts light from its fundamental by > > > > > gravity Gamma factor. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > Are you suggesting gravity has the same velocity as photons? > > > > > I thought gravity was worth at least 2c. > > > > > ~ BG- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Two light waves traveling toward one another (in a gravity) would > > > converge on a center at 2C. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > That seems likely, but even if each were making a velocity towards the > > other at .5c for a closing velocity of c, could we as one item detect > > the other? > > > ~ BG > > Do you 2 just make this stuff up as you go along? Your collective > knowledge of physics is quite diminutive. So what makes a photon go? While you're at it, tell us how fast is gravity and what makes it go? ~ BG
From: Peter Webb on 22 Apr 2010 01:58 Some parts of the Universe are moving towards us at speed c. Some of the light from other galaxies, for example. We can know nothing about this light until it actually reaches us. No information (eg that light was emitted by a distant galaxy) can travel faster than c.
From: Brad Guth on 22 Apr 2010 02:04 On Apr 21, 10:47 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/22/10 12:41 AM, Brad Guth wrote: > > > > > On Apr 21, 9:22 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 4/21/10 7:35 PM, Brad Guth wrote: > > >>> In other words, if something substantial (such as a 10 solar mass > >>> super-star and its tidal swarm of Jupiter+ planets) was headed as > >>> seemingly directly towards us at c (-299.8e3 km/sec), could that item > >>> regardless of its size, mass and vibrance be detected? > > >>> Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / Guth Usenet > > >> I though you knew that mass cannot move at c for any inertial > >> observer. Your question makes no sense given that c is the > >> cosmic speed limit. > > > In other words, you don't understand the question. > > > Should any parts or items of our universe be collapsing towards us at > > c, could we detect it? > > > ~ BG > > Everywhere we look the universe is expanding. > > No Center > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html > > Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html > > WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html > > WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html So what makes a photon go? What makes gravity go? How fast is gravity? Tell us why a quantified finite supply of photons go in only one direction, whereas immortal gravity seems to continuously go in all directions at the same time. Once more: Should any parts or items of whatevers in our universe be collapsing towards us at c, could we detect it? Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / Guth Usenet
From: Brad Guth on 22 Apr 2010 02:07
On Apr 21, 10:58 pm, "Peter Webb" <webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote: > Some parts of the Universe are moving towards us at speed c. > > Some of the light from other galaxies, for example. > > We can know nothing about this light until it actually reaches us. No > information (eg that light was emitted by a distant galaxy) can travel > faster than c. Perhaps as far as we know, yet gravity and the information it represents seems to be worth at least 2c. ~ BG |