From: Sam Wormley on
On 4/27/10 9:25 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
> Can we detect a blueshift of �c?

There is already a thread on that subject! Post there.
From: Brad Guth on
On Apr 27, 7:29 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Light headed inward of the event horizon would undergo an infinite
> energy shift as revealed by Pound Rebka light blue shift. But there
> can be no infinite energy light.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Then use -99.9999% c as the negative redshift.

~ BG

From: Brad Guth on
On Apr 27, 7:45 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/27/10 9:25 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
>
> > Can we detect a blueshift of c?
>
>    There is already a thread on that subject! Post there.

Thanks for that feedback, but this one is the new and improved (more
wordy) topic.

~ BG
From: BURT on
On Apr 27, 7:51 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 27, 7:29 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Light headed inward of the event horizon would undergo an infinite
> > energy shift as revealed by Pound Rebka light blue shift. But there
> > can be no infinite energy light.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch
>
> Then use -99.9999% c as the negative redshift.
>
>  ~ BG

So energy will go to zero in your theory?

Mitch Raemsch
From: Brad Guth on
On Apr 27, 7:59 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 27, 7:51 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 27, 7:29 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Light headed inward of the event horizon would undergo an infinite
> > > energy shift as revealed by Pound Rebka light blue shift. But there
> > > can be no infinite energy light.
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > Then use -99.9999% c as the negative redshift.
>
> >  ~ BG
>
> So energy will go to zero in your theory?
>
> Mitch Raemsch

The full negative redshift or -c blueshift should be extreme gamma,
whereas the positive redshift would be near zero energy.

~ BG