From: Joerg on 21 May 2010 10:59 krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote: > On Thu, 20 May 2010 12:31:22 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote: >>> On Tue, 18 May 2010 21:06:55 -0700, D Yuniskis <not.going.to.be(a)seen.com> >>> wrote: >> [...] >> >>>> I also found lots of quirks in their PCB package -- routes >>>> that went where *they* wanted even if you were "manually" >>>> routing (and, often, where they wanted to go was the WRONG >>>> PLACE!) >>>> >>>> Should you choose to persist... <shrug> >>> OrCAD works OK for flat schematics, well other than crashing ten times a day. >> >> OrCad SDT did hierarchies perfectly. A flat sheet structure really gets >> old when it's a dozen or more sheets and someone else has to plow >> through it later (which for me as a consultant is always the case). Did >> they break it? > > Never used SDT, but Windows versions do not. They pretend to, but it doesn't > work. The thing that busted it was that net names are not pushed down through > the hierarchy so everything gets tied in a knot. It sorta looks like it > really hooks things up right but the schematic doesn't show it. > Oh man, how did they screw that up? OrCad SDT handles net names flawlessly down the hierarchy. Software is often like Pinot Noir, older = better. There are many other SW packages where they broke things and it seems that either didn't test it or nobody gave a s..t. For example, I use MS-Works for bookkeeping. Up until version 6.0 even the Windows versions worked nicely. Then they broke rather mundane stuff, like <gasp> copy and paste. >> WRT crashes that started with the first Windows versions, it crashed on >> me numerous times. Badly, although not quite as bad and as often as >> Adobe Acrobat. OrCad SDT, can't remember a single time it crashed and >> I've done some rather fat designs with it. Large chunks of ultrasound >> machines and so on. > > I didn't use OrCad before 9.0. I used proprietary tools until the late '90s. > Good old Orcad-SDT was hands down the very best CAD software I've seen in my whole life. Windows OrCad, no, not by a longshot. That's when I decided it's time to move on to Cadsoft Eagle. But that doesn't have a hierarchy which is IMHO a serious flaw so I am still in the market for something better. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Software bloat (Larkin was right) Next: Rado Integral Jubile Ladies Watch R20488742 |