From: BURT on
On Jul 12, 7:41 pm, Huang <huangxienc...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 12, 6:30 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 7/11/10 11:16 PM, GogoJF wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 11, 11:13 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com>  wrote:
> > >> It would mean solar system crash by planetary alignment gravity. But
> > >> of course there is no chaos only predetermined order in a stable solar
> > >> system.
>
> > >> Mitch Raemsch
>
> > > The solar system has to be a most precise instrument in order to
> > > continue to exist.
>
> >    True in the short term.
>
> Chaos in the solar system. Yeah, I suppose it's quite likely to be
> there, but making an observation of such a thing seems tricky. The
> place you'd expect to see it is in a Poincare' slice of planetary
> orbital trajectories. To build up enough data to confirm such a thing
> (via observation) would take many thousands of years. Probably easier
> to find it in turbulence or molecules or someplace where things are
> movin a little faster.
>
> I really wonder how chaos and perturbation theory can go together in
> astrophysics. Say you had a nice chaotic attractor going and things
> get perturbed by an asteroid - what then. Either it continues the same
> pattern, morphs, or goes non-chaotic. Feigenbaum's constant or
> something similar may have some application for that.

There is no disorder in order.
Gravitational range would eliminate most of such chaos.

Mitch Raemsch