Prev: Are space and time separate issues that can be treated in a parallel way.
Next: THE SILENT END OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY
From: BURT on 12 Jul 2010 00:13 It would mean solar system crash by planetary alignment gravity. But of course there is no chaos only predetermined order in a stable solar system. Mitch Raemsch
From: GogoJF on 12 Jul 2010 00:16 On Jul 11, 11:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > It would mean solar system crash by planetary alignment gravity. But > of course there is no chaos only predetermined order in a stable solar > system. > > Mitch Raemsch The solar system has to be a most precise instrument in order to continue to exist.
From: GogoJF on 12 Jul 2010 00:21 On Jul 11, 11:16 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jul 11, 11:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > It would mean solar system crash by planetary alignment gravity. But > > of course there is no chaos only predetermined order in a stable solar > > system. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > The solar system has to be a most precise instrument in order to > continue to exist. It's durable- at least in terms of our ability- ours smarts to measure it.
From: Sam Wormley on 12 Jul 2010 19:30 On 7/11/10 11:16 PM, GogoJF wrote: > On Jul 11, 11:13 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> It would mean solar system crash by planetary alignment gravity. But >> of course there is no chaos only predetermined order in a stable solar >> system. >> >> Mitch Raemsch > > The solar system has to be a most precise instrument in order to > continue to exist. True in the short term.
From: Huang on 12 Jul 2010 22:41
On Jul 12, 6:30 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/11/10 11:16 PM, GogoJF wrote: > > > On Jul 11, 11:13 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> It would mean solar system crash by planetary alignment gravity. But > >> of course there is no chaos only predetermined order in a stable solar > >> system. > > >> Mitch Raemsch > > > The solar system has to be a most precise instrument in order to > > continue to exist. > > True in the short term. Chaos in the solar system. Yeah, I suppose it's quite likely to be there, but making an observation of such a thing seems tricky. The place you'd expect to see it is in a Poincare' slice of planetary orbital trajectories. To build up enough data to confirm such a thing (via observation) would take many thousands of years. Probably easier to find it in turbulence or molecules or someplace where things are movin a little faster. I really wonder how chaos and perturbation theory can go together in astrophysics. Say you had a nice chaotic attractor going and things get perturbed by an asteroid - what then. Either it continues the same pattern, morphs, or goes non-chaotic. Feigenbaum's constant or something similar may have some application for that. |