Prev: Analytic solution of this recurrence equation in complex Z-plane?
Next: Decimal Expansion of 1/7 - correction
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 17 May 2010 03:54
Now I failed to mention what happens when a white light headlight of a
car is moving
away from me, the observer with a fiberglass panel. For obvious
reasons I did not
include that because there are no cars with white taillights. So I am
assuming that
if there were white taillights and thus viewed through the fiberglass
panel would
be refraction-redshifted. I am guessing the redshift would be less
than an
oncoming white headlight, even with the stipulation of equal
intensity.

That has to be worked out in a more in depth experiment.

Supposing that I am correct in my assumption that a moving away from
an observer with a white light is also redshifted would suggest that
the
objects in astronomy which have a redshift can be either moving away
or moving towards the observer. And that suggests that the Cosmos
of objects is 50% moving away from Earth and 50% of the objects moving
towards Earth. A Cosmos of that nature would not support the Big Bang
which relies on nearly 100% of the objects moving away from one
another.

Actually I do not know what the Atom Totality theory would imply as to
percentage
moving away versus moving towards. A reasonable guess is that the
Dirac
new radioactivities to create new matter and astro bodies is in a sort
of
equilibrium state so that a 50 to 50 percent moving towards and away.

But let me outline a testing procedure to use on stars, galaxies,
quasars to
tell if the body is moving towards or away. The idea is a "eclipse"
procedure.
Suppose we see a Great Wall or a quasar or supercluster. And we set up
the telescope to eclipse the body. We eclipse it to the finest detail
possible
and then we wait for a week or month or year or more and come back and
we
place the eclipse on the same object. If a breach of the former
eclipse is seen
with light means the object is moving towards us. If it were moving
away, the
eclipse on the second time would suffice to eclipse again.

Now many of the local group of galaxies to our Milky Way are reported
a redshift,
only the old Doppler redshift was the procedure. And here is a way of
testing whether
the Refraction Redshift is true and the old Doppler redshift is false.
We eclipse one
of the local group galaxies with a reported Doppler redshift and view
it some future
time later and see if the eclipse was breached. If so, means the
galaxy is moving
towards Earth in direct contradiction to the Doppler redshift implying
a moving
away from Earth.

So in one fell swoop of testing, we can find out if the old Doppler
redshift can stand
muster or be falsified very easily.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Analytic solution of this recurrence equation in complex Z-plane?
Next: Decimal Expansion of 1/7 - correction