Prev: is the DNA/RNA a miniature biological radio receiver? #257 Atom Totality & #29 Brain Locus
Next: WHY MATHEMATICALLY Sqrt 3 minus Sqrt 2 =Sqrt -1 /3 root
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 2 Aug 2010 11:52


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> (snipped)
> >
> > Now, one more fascinating idea. What if the Brain Locus is the DNA
> > molecule? Then the molecule is a radio and is contained in all the
> > body's cells. Is a double helix acting like a
> > radio?
> >
>
> Now I went to look to see what proportion of the DNA molecule is so
> called "junk"
> and here is what Wikipedia had to say about it:
>
> --- quoting Wikipedia ---
> The amount of total genomic DNA varies widely between organisms, and
> the proportion of coding and noncoding DNA within these genomes varies
> greatly as well. More than 98% of the human genome does not encode
> protein sequences, including most sequences within introns and most
> intergenic DNA.[1]
> --- end quoting ---
>
> Now let us ask how much of a radio would be so called "junk", that is,
> how much of the
> radio is just the hardware that supports the functioning of the radio?
> Or we could ask the same question about the cellphone, as to how much
> hardware is minimally needed to house the cellphone? I think the
> answer would be that for a radio or cellphone that over 90% is housing
> hardware to hold the radio or cellphone as a "box container".
>
> Now the nice thing about having DNA as the brain locus radio receiver
> is that it is nearby to where the genetics is involved. So that if the
> Atom Totality Nucleus wants a mutation, or wants a cancer or disease,
> it just is right there in the heredity location.
>
> So let me ask the simple question, is the configuration of DNA/RNA
> that of a miniature biological radio receiver? Maybe I should post
> this to a sci.electronics newsgroup.
>
> Now the nice thing also, about DNA being the brain-locus is that if
> one is the active brain locus and should somehow fail, that another
> DNA molecule nearby can become the new brain locus.
>
> And perhaps the acting brain locus has some special atoms around it,
> say perhaps lithium for animals, or perhaps molybdenum for plants.
>
> And also, a brain locus theory fits quite nicely with alot of disease
> explanations, in that lithium
> provides relief to mental illness and depression seems to be
> alleviated by electroshock treatment. Also, I have heard that when
> someone is confined to a dark and metal enclosure, that their brain
> functions less.

Now I keep referring to the history of the Continental Drift theory of
Wegener as a model
of how the history for the Atom Totality theory will eventually play
out. Models are often
our finest tools to make educated guesses of how something will
transpire in history, how
the future will play out.

If you recall in the Continental Drift theory, the first thing to stir
Wegener's mind was the
jigsaw puzzle fit of Africa west coast into that of the South American
east coast. But later
on, what was unfolding was that the plants and animals of Africa and
South America were
so related that they must have been joined in the past. So that
biology evidence of Continental
Drift was mounting in favor of the theory.

Likewise for the Atom Totality theory, in that biology is going to
have a huge say as to whether
Atom Totality is true or false. A huge say, far more compelling than
what biology was for
Continental Drift. This is because, in quantum mechanics we have the
Bell Inequality with its
"superdeterminism" conclusion. So unlike the Continental Drift theory
where biology had a supporting role, here in the Atom Totality theory,
biology can actually prove or disprove the theory outright. In order
for there to be superdeterminism of the Bell Inequality, there cannot
be
free-will in biology. Free-will is contradictory to superdeterminism.

So the moment that biology researchers discover and prove that a
organism has a brain-locus
radio receiver and that living creatures have a brain-locus, is as
good of a final proof of the Atom Totatlity, as if the astronomers and
physicists sighted the Nucleus of the Atom Totality.

So, unlike the Continental Drift theory where biology played a
supporting evidence role, but not a proving-role, here in Atom
Totality theory, biology can actually prove outright whether it is
true or false. The biologists could beat the physicists in a race to
the finish on what the true
Cosmology theory of the world is.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: is the DNA/RNA a miniature biological radio receiver? #257 Atom Totality & #29 Brain Locus
Next: WHY MATHEMATICALLY Sqrt 3 minus Sqrt 2 =Sqrt -1 /3 root