Prev: Relativist running a race
Next: Quantum Gravity 403.9: Does the Universe Have a Time Sense, A Pain Sense, a Spatial Sense, a Memory Sense?
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 25 Jul 2010 01:12 Chapter 7 Subject: Correlation of quantized galaxy speeds 72km per second with Cosmic Microwave Here is a good website that explains quantized galaxy redshifts which implies quantized galaxy speeds. --- quoting from http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/redshift.html Remarkably, using the same solar-motion correction as before, the galaxies' redshifts again bunched around certain specific values. But this time the favored redshifts were separated by exactly 1/2 of the basic 72 km per second interval. This is clearly evident. Even allowing for this change to a 36 km per second interval, the chance of accidentally producing such a preference is less than 4 in 1000. It is therefore concluded that at least some classes of galaxy redshifts are quantized in steps that are simple fractions of 72 km per second. --- end quoting --- Now that quantized galaxy speeds (QGS) should correlate with the uniformity of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) And that correlation between CMBR and QGS would imply a Cosmic uniform QGS, or a constant and not a variable. So that the QGS should be the same near the Sloan Great Wall and Great Wall. On Aug 17, 1:00=A0am, Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...(a)gmail.com> wrote: snipped > > Now I need to look up the Tifft quantized galaxy positions or speeds. > I need to see if those Tifft quantizations follows a square pattern as > in the above Jupiter pattern or whether the > Tifft pattern is a pure doubling or halving and not a squaring. > I seem to remember it was a doubling pattern. > Looked up Tifft quantized redshifts and found this in Wikipedia: --- quoting Wikipedia --- In the late 1980s and early 1990s, four studies on redshift quantization were performed: In 1989, Martin R. Croasdale reported finding a quantization of redshifts using a different sample of galaxies in increments of 72 km/ s (=C4z=3D2.4x10-4).[15] In 1990, Bruce Guthrie and William Napier reported finding a "possible periodicity" of the same magnitude for a slightly larger data set limited to bright spiral galaxies and excluding other types[16] In 1992, Guthrie and Napier proposed the observation of a different periodicity in increments of =C4z=3D1.24x10-4 in a sample of 89 galaxies [17] In 1992, G. Paal, et al. [18] and A. Holba, et al. [19] reanalyzed the redshift data from a fairly large sample of galaxies and concluded that there was an unexplained periodicity of redshifts. In 1994, A. Holba, et al. [20] also reanalyzed the redshift data of quasars and concluded that there was unexplained periodicity of redshifts in this sample, too. --- end quoting --- So it looks like a linear doubling or halving and not a squaring. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |