Prev: Chapt7 Tifft quantized galaxy speeds, #231 Atom Totality
Next: Chapt11 layered ages in Atom Totality, #233 Atom Totality
From: Osher Doctorow on 25 Jul 2010 01:34 From Osher Doctorow From the last few posts, it is arguably interesting to explore whether the Universe has a time sense, a space sense, and even a pain sense, not necessarily exactly as "elaborate" as human senses, but deep nevertheless. Earlier posts in this thread suggested Memory at a deep level in the Universe. Here is my suggestion for how the Universe may have a pain sense: 1) Clue: the Null Set, or its analog Logical Contradiction, may represent "pain" to the Universe and any of its objects. For a space sense and a time sense, -->t and -->s from the previous posts certainly suggest that the Universe can distinguish between spatial and temporal (Probable) Causation/Influence. Since -->t and -- >s also arguably involve boundaries, here are some clues regarding these "senses" in the Universe: 2) Clue: -->t and -->s of the last few posts may indicate that the Universe even at a pre-life level can distinguish between time and space, and boundaries of time and space sets/events, which in turn suggests that there are sets/events which are purely timelike and purely spacelike. 3) Clue: Let A(t) or A_t or At represent a bounded purely timelike event, presumably along a time axis, while B(s) or B_s or Bs represents a bounded purely spacelike event. C(s, t) or Cst or C_st could represent an event in both space and time. Then a periodic variable could be generated by the Universe memorizing and detecting its boundaries in time and "repeating" them. Similarly for a recurrent pattern in space (like a tiling) with regard to spatial boundaries. 4) Clue: the Null Set or "Pain Sense" may explain Anti-Structure or "Disruption of Structure" in the Universe. Recent posts suggested a "Structural sense or tendency" in the Universe via P(A-->A) = 1. But certain structures may cause disruption of their parts, for example being unstable. Since P(A-->N) for N the Null Set equals P(A ' ) (because P(A-->N) = P(A ' U N) = P(A ' )), the only sets/events which have no disruption, that is to say for which P(A-->N) = 0, would be sets A for which P(A ' ) = 0, which says that 1 - P(A) = 0, or P(A) = 1, which is the Universe at least up to probability 0 sets. This yields the remarkable result that the Universe always retains its structure, although the structure presumably differs or can differ at different times and spatial locations - a type of "No-Go Theorem" against the Big Rip or similar catastrophic ending to the Universe. Osher Doctorow
From: Osher Doctorow on 25 Jul 2010 01:45 From Osher Doctorow In (4), that is in the last Clue, A is not being used as necessarily bounded. Osher Doctorow
From: Osher Doctorow on 25 Jul 2010 02:21
From Osher Doctorow While I'm on this topic, lets look at P(U-->U), P(U-->N), P(N-->U), P(N-->N), for U the Universe, N the null set. Using P(A-->B) = P(A ' U B) for any A, B (which in this post need not be bounded or unbounded), we get: 1) P(U-->U) = P(U ' U U) = P(N U U) = P(U) = 1. 2) P(U-->N) = P(U ' U N) = P(N U N) = P(N) = 0. 3) P(N-->U) = P(N ' U U) = P(U U U) = P(U) = 1. 4) P(N-->N) = P(N ' U N) = P(U U N) = P(U) = 1. The only unusual thing (that is to say, the only equation that would not hold if N were replaced by any set A) is (2), which says that the Universe cannot (probably) Cause/Influence the Null Set. Since by equation (3), N can Cause/Influence the Universe (but also any set A also can!), N comes close to being an "Uncaused Cause" - but note that the symbol 0, which refers to sets of probability 0, describes also sets that have the same property, because P(U-->0) = P(U ' U 0) = P(N U 0) = 0. Sets of probability 0 which are not Null include "infinitely thin" sets embedded in higher dimensional Euclidean-like spaces under quite general scenarios, for examples planes and plane sections and 2-dimensional surfaces and lines and line segments and curves and points in 3-dimensional space or even a point in time. Osher Doctorow |