Prev: Possibly unbuildable ports reminder
Next: compiz-fusion update problem
From: "Julian H. Stacey" on 2 Mar 2010 19:44
Doug Barton wrote:
> That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the
> update needs to verify the diff between the two tarballs.


> On 02/24/10 09:31, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:25:39PM +0300, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> >> On 24.02.2010 02:45, Wesley Shields wrote:
> >>>> I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one
> >>>> that matches the current distinfo file. So far no one has.
> >>>
> >>> I don't have one but QAT may. Hopefully itectu@ can confirm or deny
> >>> that.
> >>>
> >>> -- WXS
> >>
> >> 4.2.1 was released.
> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144258
> >
> > I've grabbed this PR and will be committing it once I review it.
>
> I'm not going to suggest a course of action for you, but I would like to
> say that for me I would still like to get a copy of the tarball that
> matches what's in ports now to compare against the current version. But
> I'm just paranoid like that. :)

Pursuing diffs on re-rolled sources might be nice, but Doug, after
you also refused to allow ports to flag installs of binaries not
built from fetched sources ? ... Balance seems missing !

http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/ports/binary_installs.html

Cheers,
Julian
- --
Julian Stacey: BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
Mail plain text not quoted-printable, HTML or Base64 http://www.asciiribbon.org
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

From: Doug Barton on 2 Mar 2010 22:33
On 3/2/2010 4:44 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Pursuing diffs on re-rolled sources might be nice, but Doug, after
> you also refused to allow ports to flag installs of binaries not
> built from fetched sources ? ... Balance seems missing !

I didn't "refuse" anything, I have no actual authority. :) I'm just a
lowly committer. What I _did_ say was that I agreed with the policy that
ports should be built from a stable set of sources, and I voiced my
opposition to the idea of changing that policy.

My concern about the changes to the sources of this port is along the
same lines.


Doug

--

... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads

Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/

_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Possibly unbuildable ports reminder
Next: compiz-fusion update problem