Prev: Possibly unbuildable ports reminder
Next: compiz-fusion update problem
From: hanno Krusken on 14 Feb 2010 06:46
Hi there,

since the last upgrade there is a "Checksum mismatch for FBSD port/finance/homebank-4.2"
see my log file from portupgrade.... running FreeBSD-8.0-releng-p2

===> Cleaning for homebank-4.2
===> Found saved configuration for homebank-4.1
=> homebank-4.2.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
=> Attempting to fetch from http://homebank.free.fr/public/.
fetch: http://homebank.free.fr/public/homebank-4.2.tar.gz: size mismatch: expected 2611432, actual 2611439
=> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/.
fetch: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/homebank-4.2.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
=> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/Latest/.
fetch: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/Latest/homebank-4.2.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
=> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp3.dk.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/.
fetch: ftp://ftp3.dk.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/homebank-4.2.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
=> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp2.dk.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/.
fetch: ftp://ftp2.dk.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/homebank-4.2.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
=> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.uk.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/.
fetch: ftp://ftp.uk.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/homebank-4.2.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
=> Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this
=> port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/finance/homebank.


hope the issue can be fixed soon... thanks
--
Hanno Krusken

Important note:
please do not replay with any HTML tags in your mail which will be blocked and deleted.
Regarding known SPAM, VIRUS and junk mail sender, which often use this way of fooling recipients
with fancy images and HTML-artwork. Remember that I'm using a very strict spam setup on top of it.
Thanks for your understanding.
From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov on 14 Feb 2010 15:19
On 14.02.2010 14:46, hanno Krusken wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> since the last upgrade there is a "Checksum mismatch for FBSD port/finance/homebank-4.2"
> see my log file from portupgrade.... running FreeBSD-8.0-releng-p2
>
> ===> Cleaning for homebank-4.2
> ===> Found saved configuration for homebank-4.1
> => homebank-4.2.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
> => Attempting to fetch from http://homebank.free.fr/public/.
> fetch: http://homebank.free.fr/public/homebank-4.2.tar.gz: size mismatch: expected 2611432, actual 2611439

Seems like tarball was rerolled.
4.2 was released on 10 February, but tarball's mtime is 12 Feb 16:12.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

From: Doug Barton on 14 Feb 2010 16:28
On 02/14/10 03:46, hanno Krusken wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> since the last upgrade there is a "Checksum mismatch for FBSD port/finance/homebank-4.2"
> see my log file from portupgrade.... running FreeBSD-8.0-releng-p2

Does anyone have the old distfile (the one corresponding to what's
currently in the ports tree)? If so, can you make it available for
comparison?


Doug

--

... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads

Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/

_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

From: Doug Barton on 14 Feb 2010 16:58
On 02/14/10 13:56, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled:

That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the
update needs to verify the diff between the two tarballs.


Doug

--

... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads

Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/

_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov on 23 Feb 2010 03:18
On 15.02.2010 00:58, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 02/14/10 13:56, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled:
>
> That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the
> update needs to verify the diff between the two tarballs.
>
>
> Doug
>

So is there any news about this?
The port is now marked as broken in ports tree.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Possibly unbuildable ports reminder
Next: compiz-fusion update problem