Prev: EMBEDDED DESIGN - MICROCHIP MCU's & DEVELOPMENT TOOLS - ENERGY/POWER METERS
Next: Problem during cs5460a offset calibration
From: Paul E. Bennett on 16 May 2010 05:09
hamilton wrote:

> On 5/15/2010 6:27 PM, George Neuner wrote:
>> On Sun, 16 May 2010 02:12:34 +0200, Nils<n.pipenbrinck(a)cubic.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Modafinil wrote:
>>>> Thank you to Ainhoa Ortiz Delgado and Antonio Tejada Revilla, of the
>>>> University of the Basque Country in Spain. http://www.ehu.es/
>>>
>>> Call their professor or their dean. European universities take
>>> plagiarism serious. I'm sure they will be glad to know what happened.
>>
>> If the OP can prove authorship, the university will likely take it
>> *very* seriously. Proving authorship is, of course, the catch.
>
> You did not look at the code referenced.
>
> nuff said.

Having looked at the referenced code listing and if the OP wants to claim it
as his original then I would doubt his professionalism. I have seen school-
kids produce better.

--
********************************************************************
Paul E. Bennett...............<email://Paul_E.Bennett(a)topmail.co.uk>
Forth based HIDECS Consultancy
Mob: +44 (0)7811-639972
Tel: +44 (0)1235-510979
Going Forth Safely ..... EBA. www.electric-boat-association.org.uk..
********************************************************************

From: Sheik Quassam on 16 May 2010 09:02
They usually come from China or Spain or Russia.

But look dont' despair, the opposite is also happening.
We Western countries use thei rimmigrant brains while paying them LESS, e.g.
40% of Microsoft's best preoducts were coded by non-US born engineers.

So they stole your work. But many US comnpanies use THEIR work. It flows
in both directions.

Try using "Keeloq" - a free tool for Microchip microcontrollers, in case
you're writing for Microchip, or a similar encryptor.

I know it feels very very bad to sit & kill your health & eyes in front of a
computer to write software, so some punk would steal it.

Don't publish source code anymore, LOCK your chips with Keeloq or similar.

From: Paul Carpenter on 16 May 2010 07:58
In article <859r57FakkU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
Paul_E.Bennett(a)topmail.co.uk says...
> hamilton wrote:
>
> > On 5/15/2010 6:27 PM, George Neuner wrote:
> >> On Sun, 16 May 2010 02:12:34 +0200, Nils<n.pipenbrinck(a)cubic.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Modafinil wrote:
> >>>> Thank you to Ainhoa Ortiz Delgado and Antonio Tejada Revilla, of the
> >>>> University of the Basque Country in Spain. http://www.ehu.es/
> >>>
> >>> Call their professor or their dean. European universities take
> >>> plagiarism serious. I'm sure they will be glad to know what happened.
> >>
> >> If the OP can prove authorship, the university will likely take it
> >> *very* seriously. Proving authorship is, of course, the catch.
> >
> > You did not look at the code referenced.
> >
> > nuff said.
>
> Having looked at the referenced code listing and if the OP wants to claim it
> as his original then I would doubt his professionalism. I have seen school-
> kids produce better.

I could not agree more as it could be argued that his code is VERY
similar to any number of other pieces of 4 bit parallel mode EXAMPLE
routines used to demo any number of HD44780 lookalike LCD displays.
I have seen similar code examples on many datasheets/application notes.

The code employs delay loops, not timers or other methods to make it
useable in many real world applications.

Code would need changing for any format of display different to
16 x 2 and possibly special character sets.

--
Paul Carpenter | paul(a)pcserviceselectronics.co.uk
<http://www.pcserviceselectronics.co.uk/> PC Services
<http://www.pcserviceselectronics.co.uk/fonts/> Timing Diagram Font
<http://www.gnuh8.org.uk/> GNU H8 - compiler & Renesas H8/H8S/H8 Tiny
<http://www.badweb.org.uk/> For those web sites you hate
From: larwe on 16 May 2010 10:47
On May 16, 9:02 am, "Sheik Quassam" <Quas...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

> Try using "Keeloq" - a free tool for Microchip microcontrollers, in case

Keeloq is a rolling-code encryption system designed to prevent replay
attacks from keyfob type remote controls. It is not designed for
protecting code contents. It has also been broken.
From: Vladimir Vassilevsky on 16 May 2010 12:40


Modafinil wrote:
> Thank you to Ainhoa Ortiz Delgado and Antonio Tejada Revilla, of the
> University of the Basque Country in Spain. http://www.ehu.es/
>
> I would like to say how much I appreciate you removing my lawful copyright
> declaration on various original 8051 microcontroller source code files,
> conditionally downloaded from my website, and selfishly replacing it with
> your own.

Who cares about your trivial junk. Only idiots like you.

VLV
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: EMBEDDED DESIGN - MICROCHIP MCU's & DEVELOPMENT TOOLS - ENERGY/POWER METERS
Next: Problem during cs5460a offset calibration