Commenting On Unused Equipment
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Michael on 26 Oct 2009 22:52 On 2009-10-26 22:33:32 -0400, John A. <john(a)nowhere.invalid> said: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:26:05 -0500, Curiouser and Curiouser > <questioning(a)anyisp.net> wrote: > >> I sometimes wonder why people feel the need to make authoritative comments >> on equipment they've never used, never touched, and never even considered >> as part of their camera gear. > > You tell us. Why do you praise P&S cameras to high heaven while > denigrating DSLRs you've never used, touched, nor even considered? > > We know why, of course: you're the infamous P&S Troll. We simply don't > know specifically why you are a troll, or why you chose to target this > group in particular. Nor do we care, actually. I was wondering how many responses I'd read before someone recognized our infamous friend. -- Michael
From: Mike Russell on 26 Oct 2009 22:58 On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:52:48 -0400, Michael wrote: > On 2009-10-26 22:33:32 -0400, John A. <john(a)nowhere.invalid> said: > >> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:26:05 -0500, Curiouser and Curiouser >> <questioning(a)anyisp.net> wrote: >> >>> I sometimes wonder why people feel the need to make authoritative comments >>> on equipment they've never used, never touched, and never even considered >>> as part of their camera gear. >> >> You tell us. Why do you praise P&S cameras to high heaven while >> denigrating DSLRs you've never used, touched, nor even considered? >> >> We know why, of course: you're the infamous P&S Troll. We simply don't >> know specifically why you are a troll, or why you chose to target this >> group in particular. Nor do we care, actually. > > I was wondering how many responses I'd read before someone recognized > our infamous friend. This is better than Cylons. -- Mike Russell - http://www.curvemeister.com
From: Savageduck on 26 Oct 2009 23:02 On 2009-10-26 19:52:48 -0700, Michael <adunc79617(a)mypacks.net> said: > On 2009-10-26 22:33:32 -0400, John A. <john(a)nowhere.invalid> said: > >> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:26:05 -0500, Curiouser and Curiouser >> <questioning(a)anyisp.net> wrote: >> >>> I sometimes wonder why people feel the need to make authoritative comments >>> on equipment they've never used, never touched, and never even considered >>> as part of their camera gear. >> >> You tell us. Why do you praise P&S cameras to high heaven while >> denigrating DSLRs you've never used, touched, nor even considered? >> >> We know why, of course: you're the infamous P&S Troll. We simply don't >> know specifically why you are a troll, or why you chose to target this >> group in particular. Nor do we care, actually. > > I was wondering how many responses I'd read before someone recognized > our infamous friend. It's all in the words. -- Regards, Savageduck
From: Curiouser and Curiouser on 26 Oct 2009 23:27 On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:02:31 -0700, Savageduck <savageduck@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: >On 2009-10-26 19:52:48 -0700, Michael <adunc79617(a)mypacks.net> said: > >> On 2009-10-26 22:33:32 -0400, John A. <john(a)nowhere.invalid> said: >> >>> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:26:05 -0500, Curiouser and Curiouser >>> <questioning(a)anyisp.net> wrote: >>> >>>> I sometimes wonder why people feel the need to make authoritative comments >>>> on equipment they've never used, never touched, and never even considered >>>> as part of their camera gear. >>> >>> You tell us. Why do you praise P&S cameras to high heaven while >>> denigrating DSLRs you've never used, touched, nor even considered? >>> >>> We know why, of course: you're the infamous P&S Troll. We simply don't >>> know specifically why you are a troll, or why you chose to target this >>> group in particular. Nor do we care, actually. >> >> I was wondering how many responses I'd read before someone recognized >> our infamous friend. > >It's all in the words. I'd wonder how many of those DSLR psychotics would reply, never realizing that I HAVE used DSLRs, sold them all when I found out P&S cameras were better. So I *DO* have first-hand knowledge of what I speak about. How do you think I know of so many of the glaring faults wrapped in the DSLR design concept? Found the faults by using the cameras. You will also note, that I *NEVER* go out of my way to slam any camera unless some psychotic troll is inventing stories about P&S cameras they've never used. I don't slam DSLRs, I only defend P&S cameras against the wild imaginings of insecure and psychotic DSLR-Trolls. It's that simple. I'm so far ahead of you psychotic, useless, ignorant, and inexperienced trolls in experience and knowledge about photography and the required equipment that you don't even have a clue. Never slam a P&S again and I'll have no reason to compare their superior reason for being over that of useless DSLRs. Useless in comparison of course. Even a lowly DSLR can provide excellent images in the hands of someone who knows what they are doing. If you're willing to put up with their myriad and vast drawbacks that is.
From: Miles Bader on 26 Oct 2009 23:44
Michael <adunc79617(a)mypacks.net> writes: >> We know why, of course: you're the infamous P&S Troll. We simply don't >> know specifically why you are a troll, or why you chose to target this >> group in particular. Nor do we care, actually. > > I was wondering how many responses I'd read before someone recognized > our infamous friend. Using one of his standard trolling techniques too. He may be an idiot when it comes to photography, but he's actually pretty skillful at trolling... -Miles -- Politeness, n. The most acceptable hypocrisy. |