Commenting On Unused Equipment
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: Bob Larter on 27 Oct 2009 07:02 Bob Larter is Lionel Lauer - Look it up wrote: > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:51:54 +1100, Bob Larter <bobbylarter(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Curiouser and Curiouser wrote: >>> I sometimes wonder why people feel the ne[*Yawn!*] > > > > see: alt.kooks.lionel-lauer > > A valid group in the known net-trolls groups. Really? - I don't know any servers that carry it. ;^) -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
From: tony cooper on 27 Oct 2009 10:00 On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:12:41 -0500, Curiouser and Curiouser <questioning(a)anyisp.net> wrote: >On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:44:38 -0400, tony cooper ><tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >>On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:51:05 -0500, Curiouser and Curiouser >><questioning(a)anyisp.net> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:43:21 -0700, Mike Russell >>><groupsRE(a)MOVEcurvemeister.com> wrote: >>> >>>>something resembling a discussion >>> >>>Translation: Any comments that blindly and foolishly agree with Mike >>>Russel's far lesser experience in the field of photography and related >>>equipment. >> >>I gotta laugh at this. Here's Mike - the Spam-meister - who could >>write a book on digital photography and post-processing (or maybe he >>has) being belittled by someone who has never taken a photograph good >>enough to show us. >> >>Mike's got cattle. You just have a hat. > >Mike is here to spam his software. Probably lost sales due to the economy >so he's not even caring that he's violating Usenet policies. An act of >desperation on his part. Nothing more. I've tested his software. It's not >that great. I no longer recommend it to anyone else. Mike is probably grateful for this. >Did at one time, years >ago, but other programs have become far better. > >You might want to look into the curve-generator for CHDK capable cameras, >for custom curves done in-camera. Where you tweak all 4 RGGB channels. Can >you count higher than 3? What are the four "RGGB" channels? Here's me thinking that there is only one RGB channel and three other channels: red, green, and blue. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
From: George Kerby on 27 Oct 2009 10:46 On 10/26/09 10:27 PM, in article acpce5drnv7l03118nnsrbh6sirvur1nj5(a)4ax.com, "Curiouser and Curiouser" <questioning(a)anyisp.net> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:02:31 -0700, Savageduck > <savageduck@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: > >> On 2009-10-26 19:52:48 -0700, Michael <adunc79617(a)mypacks.net> said: >> >>> On 2009-10-26 22:33:32 -0400, John A. <john(a)nowhere.invalid> said: >>> >>>> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:26:05 -0500, Curiouser and Curiouser >>>> <questioning(a)anyisp.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I sometimes wonder why people feel the need to make authoritative comments >>>>> on equipment they've never used, never touched, and never even considered >>>>> as part of their camera gear. >>>> >>>> You tell us. Why do you praise P&S cameras to high heaven while >>>> denigrating DSLRs you've never used, touched, nor even considered? >>>> >>>> We know why, of course: you're the infamous P&S Troll. We simply don't >>>> know specifically why you are a troll, or why you chose to target this >>>> group in particular. Nor do we care, actually. >>> >>> I was wondering how many responses I'd read before someone recognized >>> our infamous friend. >> >> It's all in the words. > > I'd wonder how many of those DSLR psychotics would reply, never realizing > that I HAVE used DSLRs, sold them all when I found out P&S cameras were > better. So I *DO* have first-hand knowledge of what I speak about. How do > you think I know of so many of the glaring faults wrapped in the DSLR > design concept? Found the faults by using the cameras. > > You will also note, that I *NEVER* go out of my way to slam any camera > unless some psychotic troll is inventing stories about P&S cameras they've > never used. I don't slam DSLRs, I only defend P&S cameras against the wild > imaginings of insecure and psychotic DSLR-Trolls. It's that simple. > > I'm so far ahead of you psychotic, useless, ignorant, and inexperienced > trolls in experience and knowledge about photography and the required > equipment that you don't even have a clue. > I've concluded that you are suffering from a severe case of Anatidaephobia...
From: Ofnuts on 27 Oct 2009 10:47 tony cooper wrote: > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:12:41 -0500, Curiouser and Curiouser > <questioning(a)anyisp.net> wrote: > >> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:44:38 -0400, tony cooper >> <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:51:05 -0500, Curiouser and Curiouser >>> <questioning(a)anyisp.net> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:43:21 -0700, Mike Russell >>>> <groupsRE(a)MOVEcurvemeister.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> something resembling a discussion >>>> Translation: Any comments that blindly and foolishly agree with Mike >>>> Russel's far lesser experience in the field of photography and related >>>> equipment. >>> I gotta laugh at this. Here's Mike - the Spam-meister - who could >>> write a book on digital photography and post-processing (or maybe he >>> has) being belittled by someone who has never taken a photograph good >>> enough to show us. >>> >>> Mike's got cattle. You just have a hat. >> Mike is here to spam his software. Probably lost sales due to the economy >> so he's not even caring that he's violating Usenet policies. An act of >> desperation on his part. Nothing more. I've tested his software. It's not >> that great. I no longer recommend it to anyone else. > > Mike is probably grateful for this. > >> Did at one time, years >> ago, but other programs have become far better. >> >> You might want to look into the curve-generator for CHDK capable cameras, >> for custom curves done in-camera. Where you tweak all 4 RGGB channels. Can >> you count higher than 3? > > What are the four "RGGB" channels? Here's me thinking that there is > only one RGB channel and three other channels: red, green, and blue. On the usual Bayer matrix there are two sensors for green for one blue and one red. So the sensor output is four channels with two green ones. -- Bertrand
From: Neil Harrington on 27 Oct 2009 12:02
"Curiouser and Curiouser" <questioning(a)anyisp.net> wrote in message news:uedce5pudtfnk3m5ql001m1jh7n3uvikgk(a)4ax.com... > > > So what causes this need for people to pretend to be authorities on things > that they have no real knowledge about? > > Are they just psychotic trolls? Well, P&S trolls probably are. Better check in to a mental health clinic, Dingleberry. |