From: za kAT on
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:18:31 GMT, Bottoms????? wrote:

> He doesn't know what he is saying Hummer.

I know exactly what I'm saying. I knew exactly what I was doing. I even
clarified the point with you, and I can prove it.

Me

Message-ID: <hi7d53$n95$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>

OK, I'll have to set up a super secret email account of my own. I'll let
you know later the addy.

Can you gentlemen just clarify for the record the addy we are claiming.

Many thanks.

The one who still claims to be Bottom replies

Message-ID: <Xns9CFA50956BA37bearbottoms1gmailcom(a)69.16.185.250>

REMOVEbearbottoms1(a)gmail.com

you don't have to do anything but send an email to that account with any
check phrase you like....no need to James Bond it.

<shrug>

--
za kAT



From: za kAT on
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:15:59 GMT, Bear Bottoms wrote:

> Bear Bottoms <REMOVEbearbottoms1(a)gmail.com> wrote in
> news:Xns9CFB6DEFEB0E7bearbottoms1gmailcom(a)69.16.185.247:
>
>> Bear Bottoms <REMOVETHISbearbottoms1(a)gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:Xns9CFB5FF463E56bearbottoms1gmailcom(a)69.16.185.250:
>>
>>> hummingbird <hummingb�rd(a)127.0.0.1> wrote in
>>> news:9c966ca692b67ad5d1eaed8298f86b8a(a)aracari.org:
>>>
>>>> 'Bear Bottoms' wrote thus:
>>>>
>>>>>hummingbird <hummingb�rd(a)127.0.0.1> wrote in
>>>>>news:34337e811d62b0d8b5664dbcdc7d3c04(a)aracari.org:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 08:20:14 -0600, doggy wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But, who is the Forger - Bear Bottoms at Cox or Bear Bottoms who
>>>>>>>> injects?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well correct me if I am wrong, but as I understand it, it's
>>>>>>> certainly not the person who has access to the postbox
>>>>>>> REMOVEbearbottoms1 at gmail.com
>>>>>>> See test results, and make up your own mind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. I've seen no test results.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. are you saying that you sent an e-mail to exactly:
>>>>>> <REMOVEbearbottoms1(a)gmail.com> and got the required response?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...or what are you saying?
>>>>>
>>>>> He doesn't know what he is saying Hummer. I own the gmail account
>>>>> unmunged .
>>>>
>>>> Indeed you do, I know that. However it is possible that the forger
>>>> created an account thus: <REMOVEbearbottoms1(a)gmail.com> and
>>>> Stubbo sent the e-mail to that address and got a suitable reply.
>>>> Duh! Well of course he would!
>>>> But without him posting the test results we have to assume he
>>>> never sent an e-mail at all and is just blustering.
>>>>
>>>>>It is easy enough to prove. If he is saying he made an account
>>>>>with gmail with that exact addy (including the REMOVE), then he is
>>>>>truly demented.
>>>>
>>>> ISTM he's trying to obfuscate and blow out a smoke screen.
>>>
>>> Heh, he created an account with gmail REMOVEbearbottoms1 at
>>> gmail.com. So I created one with REMOVETHISbearbottoms1(a)gmail.com
>>> which I will now use in my headers. What a dork.
>>
>> Thank you William for stopping confusion. Didn't want to ask Cox but
>> you left no choice.
>>
>
> Don't know what you are talking about concerning Cox. I've heard nothing
> from them, however, I have prevented you from using the same ploy with
> REMOVETHISbearbottoms1(a)gmail.com haven't I.

It would be helpful if you changed your nym as well.

As you have finally fessed up you are NOT

REMOVEbearbottoms1 at gmail.com

It would be the decent thing to do, don't you think?

If you want any help with that, just ask.

--
za kAT

From: za kAT on
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:48:50 +0000, hummingbird wrote:

> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>
>>On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:46:00 +0000, hummingbird wrote:
>>
>>> Indeed you do, I know that. However it is possible that the forger
>>> created an account thus: <REMOVEbearbottoms1(a)gmail.com> and
>>> Stubbo sent the e-mail to that address
>>
>>Er! are you accepting now, that I am /not/ the person who /you/ deem to be
>>a forger?
>
> Absolutely not. You obviously misunderstand my comments...

What the bit that read "However it is possible that the forger created an
account thus: <REMOVEbearbottoms1(a)gmail.com> and Stubbo sent the e-mail to
that address"

BAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

>> and that I did send an email,
>
> I have seen no evidence of this from you.

It's a text file. How can that /ever/ be evidence? Clueless.

>>and that I had no idea where it was going?
>
> Eh?

Simple enough statement. When I sent that email I had no idea where it was
going, or to whom. Period.

It's taken you a day to figure out the bleeding obvious. You were so
blinded by your humilation over the IP, and so convinced Bear Bottoms was
me, you have only just twigged the addy issue.

Read my posts carefully Dumb and Dumber. I don't lie. I don't need to. You
are so stupid. BAHAHAHAHA!!!!

--
za kAT


From: za kAT on
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:14:59 +0000, hummingbird wrote:

> 'za kAT' wrote thus:
>
>>On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:18:31 GMT, Bottoms????? wrote:
>>
>>> He doesn't know what he is saying Hummer.
>>
>>I know exactly what I'm saying. I knew exactly what I was doing. I even
>>clarified the point with you, and I can prove it.
>>
>>Me
>>
>>Message-ID: <hi7d53$n95$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>
>>
>>OK, I'll have to set up a super secret email account of my own. I'll let
>>you know later the addy.
>>
>>Can you gentlemen just clarify for the record the addy we are claiming.
>>
>>Many thanks.
>>
>>The one who still claims to be Bottom replies
>>
>>Message-ID: <Xns9CFA50956BA37bearbottoms1gmailcom(a)69.16.185.250>
>>
>>REMOVEbearbottoms1(a)gmail.com
>>
>>you don't have to do anything but send an email to that account with any
>>check phrase you like....no need to James Bond it.
>>
>><shrug>
>
> This post of yours provides all the confirmation needed that you
> are the forger, Stubbings. It's amazing that you've spent the
> past 3 days screaming and protesting your innocence with bluff
> and bluster.

Tiny mind, you just cannot accept, that I had no idea who owned
REMOVEbearbottoms1 at gmail.com.

All I did was send an email. You just hadn't understood what the owner of
REMOVEbearbottoms1 at gmail.com was saying. Why? because you are both
stupid.

I knew what was going on. In fact I think it was /you/ or that other cretin
who actually posted some stuff you got back re a complaint where it
explained the issue.

None so blind as a dummy.

--
za kAT


From: za kAT on
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:54:59 GMT, Bear Bottoms wrote:

>> I just checked, they're both valid addresses. Perhaps that's why
>> Banana boy won't take action. IIUC it's e-mail address
>> falsification that he won't accept.
>>
>>
> Too bad...to allow such behavior through his service reduces the quality
> of the service. I will block all posts from eternal-september and boycott
> it.

Now do you mean block as in killfile. Just asking because we had a little
difficulty last time with /your/ vs everybody else's meaning of killfile.

then there's hummies legendary killfiling technique...

It takes two to tanty... BAHAHAHA!!!

--
za kAT