Compiling kernel took a lot of disk space.
in [Debian]
|
Prev: Understanding my recurrent network connectivity problems
Next: Wireshark: how can I give rights to interfaces without launching it as root?
From: Lisi on 28 Jun 2010 09:40 On Monday 28 June 2010 12:12:23 Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > So I guess we're still looking for an example of a non-English name > that can't be pronounced right. Can't think of any. It isn't a case of whether it can be correctly pronounced, but of whether it is. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201006281437.24877.lisi.reisz(a)gmail.com
From: Stephen Powell on 28 Jun 2010 09:40 On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:20:05 -0400 (EDT), Sjoerd Hardeman wrote: > Op 28-06-10 13:12, Tzafrir Cohen schreef: >> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:44:15AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: >>> On Lu, 28 iun 10, 10:51:02, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote: >>>> >>>> PS: Certainly this is not my real name. 8-) I am not from an English >>>> country. Some people cannot pronounce my name right. So I use this >>>> pseudonym. >>> >>> That doesn't stop me from using my real name ;) >> >> Though English people have no problem pronouncing your name. >> >> So I guess we're still looking for an example of a non-English name >> that can't be pronounced right. Can't think of any. > > Well, each name *can* in principle be pronounced right. Yet, non-Dutch > people have a hard time with my name. > > Sjoerd (pronounced a bit like 'should' with an r instead of an l. > Somehow that's very difficult) These are all interesting points, but they are all irrelevant to e-mail. In an e-mail, one doesn't need to be able to pronounce a name. One only needs to be able to copy and paste. Thus, the justification of the use of a pseudonym on the grounds that other people can't pronounce it right is not a valid one for the e-mail media. My own name, Stephen, though an English name in an English-speaking country, and a name that appears in the Holy Bible, has often been mispronounced as "Steffan" instead of "Steven". But I still use my real name in e-mails. -- .''`. Stephen Powell : :' : `. `'` `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/595260604.3985.1277731775384.JavaMail.root(a)md01.wow.synacor.com
From: H.S. on 28 Jun 2010 11:00 On 27/06/10 10:51 PM, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote: > Thank you guys. > I have not follow Stephen's guide, but I figured the reason out. It > seems like an ext3's fault. The space (i-node wise) was used 5.x GB, > but the actual space (data wise) was used only 1 GB. So a lot of space > was just empty and wasted. I experience the same thing some weeks ago (had to use a different machine with a larger hard disk to get the job done). It is interesting to note that you think that ext3 is at fault here. How did you find that out? I would like to know whether it is a problem with ext3 at this time in Unstable. -- Please reply to this list only. I read this list on its corresponding newsgroup on gmane.org. Replies sent to my email address are just filtered to a folder in my mailbox and get periodically deleted without ever having been read. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/i0ad2n$of0$1(a)dough.gmane.org
From: Magicloud Magiclouds on 28 Jun 2010 21:20 I am using debian unstable 64 bit with lvm and ext3. All options are default. How did I find out? This OS is a VM. And the disk data is in a non-fixed size file, not compressed. Sorry I forgot how to say this in English, by non-fixed size, I mean the VM software just allocate the actual disk space that has data to write. And I think this is not just about ext3, but ext3 & 64bit. Because with the same environment, 32bit works fine for this process. On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:54 PM, H.S. <hs.samix(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 27/06/10 10:51 PM, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote: >> Thank you guys. >> I have not follow Stephen's guide, but I figured the reason out. It >> seems like an ext3's fault. The space (i-node wise) was used 5.x GB, >> but the actual space (data wise) was used only 1 GB. So a lot of space >> was just empty and wasted. > > I experience the same thing some weeks ago (had to use a different > machine with a larger hard disk to get the job done). It is interesting > to note that you think that ext3 is at fault here. How did you find that > out? I would like to know whether it is a problem with ext3 at this time > in Unstable. > > > -- > > Please reply to this list only. I read this list on its corresponding > newsgroup on gmane.org. Replies sent to my email address are just > filtered to a folder in my mailbox and get periodically deleted without > ever having been read. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian..org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/i0ad2n$of0$1(a)dough.gmane.org > > -- 竹å¯å²å¦¨æµæ°´è¿ å±±é«åªé»éäºé£ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTimNtolMfuAiHY24esXDIQHcWV8rUUe19TAqO_SG(a)mail.gmail.com
From: Magicloud Magiclouds on 29 Jun 2010 03:00
Sorry, my mistake, nothing about 64 bit. I compiled the 32bit kernel in xfs.. On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Magicloud Magiclouds <magicloud.magiclouds(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I am using debian unstable 64 bit with lvm and ext3. All options are default. > How did I find out? This OS is a VM. And the disk data is in a > non-fixed size file, not compressed. Sorry I forgot how to say this in > English, by non-fixed size, I mean the VM software just allocate the > actual disk space that has data to write. > And I think this is not just about ext3, but ext3 & 64bit. Because > with the same environment, 32bit works fine for this process. > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:54 PM, H.S. <hs.samix(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 27/06/10 10:51 PM, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote: >>> Thank you guys. >>> I have not follow Stephen's guide, but I figured the reason out. It >>> seems like an ext3's fault. The space (i-node wise) was used 5.x GB, >>> but the actual space (data wise) was used only 1 GB. So a lot of space >>> was just empty and wasted. >> >> I experience the same thing some weeks ago (had to use a different >> machine with a larger hard disk to get the job done). It is interesting >> to note that you think that ext3 is at fault here. How did you find that >> out? I would like to know whether it is a problem with ext3 at this time >> in Unstable. >> >> >> -- >> >> Please reply to this list only. I read this list on its corresponding >> newsgroup on gmane.org. Replies sent to my email address are just >> filtered to a folder in my mailbox and get periodically deleted without >> ever having been read. >> >> >> -- >> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org >> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org >> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/i0ad2n$of0$1(a)dough.gmane.org >> >> > > > > -- > 竹å¯å²å¦¨æµæ°´è¿ > å±±é«åªé»éäºé£ > -- 竹å¯å²å¦¨æµæ°´è¿ å±±é«åªé»éäºé£ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTilHSQtbGUejPEmtN3sQz6DYLMpewWKOG0PzHeHw(a)mail.gmail.com |