Config T1 with routed block
in [Cisco]
|
Prev: Vlans
Next: T1 Serial Problems
From: Stevo on 15 Sep 2009 20:27 On Sep 15, 4:15 pm, Doug McIntyre <mer...(a)geeks.org> wrote: > Doug McIntyre <mer...(a)geeks.org> writes: > >Stevo <riski...(a)gmail.com> writes: > >>On Sep 15, 12:16=A0pm, Doug McIntyre <mer...(a)geeks.org> wrote: > >>Thanks for the Info. This is no different than my configuration > >>listed below: > >>interface Ethernet0 > >> ip address 64.39.164.230 255.255.255.248 > >> ip nat outside > >>interface FastEthernet0 > >> ip address 10.10.1.1 255.255.255.0 > >> ip nat inside > >>interface Serial0 > >> ip address 209.183.134.162 255.255.255.252 > >> ip nat outside > >>ip nat inside source list 101 interface Serial0 overload > >I gave you two different setup scenarios. I gave you one without NAT > >at all, and I gave you pointers to documents laying out a NAT setup. > >It appears you want to use the 2nd, so disreguard anything I said in > >the first config. (although if you didn't want NAT turned on for Eth0 > >just remove the 'ip nat outside' statement, and you'll be routing on > >Eth0 and NAT'ing on Fa0). > > I should have said here, that you appear to have taken off in a 3rd > direction, in having NAT on one interface, and routed IPs on another. > Is that correct?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - That's correct. I would like to have my routed IP's on my ETH0 and NATed on my FastETH0. Thanks
From: Stevo on 16 Sep 2009 08:14
On Sep 15, 4:15 pm, Doug McIntyre <mer...(a)geeks.org> wrote: > Doug McIntyre <mer...(a)geeks.org> writes: > >Stevo <riski...(a)gmail.com> writes: > >>On Sep 15, 12:16=A0pm, Doug McIntyre <mer...(a)geeks.org> wrote: > >>Thanks for the Info. This is no different than my configuration > >>listed below: > >>interface Ethernet0 > >> ip address 64.39.164.230 255.255.255.248 > >> ip nat outside > >>interface FastEthernet0 > >> ip address 10.10.1.1 255.255.255.0 > >> ip nat inside > >>interface Serial0 > >> ip address 209.183.134.162 255.255.255.252 > >> ip nat outside > >>ip nat inside source list 101 interface Serial0 overload > >I gave you two different setup scenarios. I gave you one without NAT > >at all, and I gave you pointers to documents laying out a NAT setup. > >It appears you want to use the 2nd, so disreguard anything I said in > >the first config. (although if you didn't want NAT turned on for Eth0 > >just remove the 'ip nat outside' statement, and you'll be routing on > >Eth0 and NAT'ing on Fa0). > > I should have said here, that you appear to have taken off in a 3rd > direction, in having NAT on one interface, and routed IPs on another. > Is that correct?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Yes this is correct. Even a simple setup without the 2nd WIC and no nat, my routed IP's don't work. I have a feeling my ISP has not routed my block correctly. I'll touch base with them today. Thanks |