From: Steve Foster on 13 Aug 2010 09:29 Leythos wrote: > In article <xn0gxsrgiyq3p1401i(a)news.eternal-september.org>, > stevefoster(a)invalid.invalid says... > > > > Leythos wrote: > > > > > Of all the things I read in your post, the idea that you're using > > > RAID-0 bothers me more than anything - the massive increase > > > possible failure for using RAID-0 vs RAID-1 makes it impractical > > > for most applications. > > > > Odd, I don't see any mention of RAID in the OP at all (nor mention > > of second servers, either!). > > I'm getting old, confused part of this thread with another I was > thinking of responding to. I know how you feel. -- Steve Foster For SSL Certificates, Domains, etc, visit.: https://netshop.virtual-isp.net |